Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

416" L92...GMPP Carb intake or FAST L92??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #41  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 6
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

As for intakes I wouldn't know with L92 heads.I know they work better than a FAST setup with a similar motor running ETP heads.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #42  
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 5
From: WPB, FL
Default

Originally Posted by HTMtrSprt
Back to the original topic of this thread.... intake manifold selection. We have been testing different cams in a 408 L92 head combo and come up with some very interesting data. When we tried the GMPP L92 carb/EFI intake, the engine simply died EVERYWHERE. As I have stated before, it's about port velocity, and the carb style intake doesn't have it. The runners are just way too big. If you were to fill the runners in the GMPP intake, I think it would help immensely. As it is, we are modifying an L76 intake right now.... test results to come.

Brian
HiTech Motorsport
Good info. Thx
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #43  
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 5
From: WPB, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
As for intakes I wouldn't know with L92 heads.I know they work better than a FAST setup with a similar motor running ETP heads.
Are you saying that the L92/L76 is better than a FAST 90/ETP setup? I really havent seen anything to justify this. I apologize if I misunderstood and you meant the other way around.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 PM.