FAST 90mm Intakes - DISCONTINUED
02-28-2008, 12:08 PM
#1
FAST 90mm Intakes - DISCONTINUED There have been a few posts concerning this so I thought I'd post up. We recieved an email from our FAST rep. yesterday updating us that the FAST 90mm intake (part #54003) has been discontinued and replaced with the FAST 92mm intake (part # 54039). I just got off the phone with FAST confirming that the 90mm intakes have indeed been discontinued and are no longer available. Hopefully we all find that bigger is better!
Jon
Texas Speed & Performance
Jon
Texas Speed & Performance
02-28-2008, 01:01 PM
#2
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lampe, Mo
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Huh. Well, I already have mine, but that is weird. Whatever, Funny strategy. But why would you discontinue the best intake on the market? Its got a huge following, and now they dont want to keep it? They should have gotten rid of the 78mm version.
02-28-2008, 02:38 PM
#4
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ottawa, IL
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just ordered a Fast/92 b/c they discontinued the 90 and the guys at Fast told me that besides the intake opening and some other small perks (stainless hardware and different material) the 92 and 90 are the same intake.
02-28-2008, 05:01 PM
#6
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chesterfield,Va
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can the opening of a Fast 90 be ported to accept the new 92mm TB? I need a new TB for my ported Fast 90 and I would just assume go with the 92mm TB if it can be made to work.
Trending Topics
02-28-2008, 08:09 PM
#10
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well since the FAST 92 is just a FAST 90 with some upgrades and the logical progression would be phasing out the old 90mm... Nothing at all shocking there.
Motors are just going to get bigger from here into forever as far as performance goes. 
02-29-2008, 10:56 AM
#17
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Meh...I bet there isn't a dimes worth of difference between the 90 and the 92 stock for stock. My guess is MAYBE 1-2 more hp. I would like to be proven wrong though.
IMHO, instead of creating the 92 and getting rid of the 90 they should have created a 100mm intake and keep the 90. That would have gotten peoples attention and made me break out my check book again.
IMHO, instead of creating the 92 and getting rid of the 90 they should have created a 100mm intake and keep the 90. That would have gotten peoples attention and made me break out my check book again.
Last edited by firechicken_98; 02-29-2008 at 02:29 PM.
03-01-2008, 07:48 PM
#20
Meh...I bet there isn't a dimes worth of difference between the 90 and the 92 stock for stock. My guess is MAYBE 1-2 more hp. I would like to be proven wrong though.
IMHO, instead of creating the 92 and getting rid of the 90 they should have created a 100mm intake and keep the 90. That would have gotten peoples attention and made me break out my check book again.
IMHO, instead of creating the 92 and getting rid of the 90 they should have created a 100mm intake and keep the 90. That would have gotten peoples attention and made me break out my check book again.