L92 / LS3 into 4th Gen Camaro - LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion



Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

L92 / LS3 into 4th Gen Camaro

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2009, 03:51 PM   #1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 195
Default L92 / LS3 into 4th Gen Camaro

I didn't feel like hijacking anyones thread, so I thought I'd just go ahead and post mine up here as well.

My build is going to be fairly modest. I'm doing an L92 swap due to the fact that my LS1 blew up last year at an autocross. This engine is being setup to provide good low end torque, and with an emphasis on being reliable with sustained high RPM usage. I estimate that it will see 80% of its time running SM in local SCCA Solo competition, 15% of its time on the street, and 5% of its time at HPDE events in the future.

A friend of mine is actually doing the swap, he is on here by the screen name "wild_ron."

Last time the car was running:



Starting point - ruined LS1:



The engine started off life as an L92 truck engine that I purchased from NineBall:

















The engine will be reusing my old F-body oil pan, but will be using an Improved Racing oil pan baffle to prevent oil starvation:



It will be using a Katech C5R timing chain:





Katech belt tensioner:



The cam has been custom speced by Patrick G to meet the above mentioned goals. The best that I can describe it as a "Super ASA" cam; the duration is very similar to that engine but it has a much higher lift. He also specified longer pushrods for valvetrain stability and Patriot Xtreme double valve springs:









This build will be "plug and play" with the existing 2001 Camaro ECM. As a result, I'm making use of a set of LS3 cam gear and front cover that I sourced from Lingenfelter, and taking advatage of their new reluctor wheel convertor. I've also sourced a Racetronix knock sensor harness:





The engine will breath through a L76 intake, and is using a Professional Products fuel rail setup sourced from SDPC. The heads have their intake valves replaced with LS3 hollow stem variants.

At this point, the build has stalled because I didn't have the proper cam bolt (the L92 unit contains a valve and will not work with a non-VVT cam setup), and I don't have the appropriate crank bolt. I received confirmation from Lingenfelter that those parts should arrive by the end of this week.

Last edited by 01badz28; 10-12-2009 at 04:22 PM.
01badz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 12:55 PM   #2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (78)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: League City, Tx
Posts: 5,076
Default

Tootall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 01:25 PM   #3
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,357
Default

damn!
SIC LSX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 03:20 PM   #4
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,239
Default

Keeping an eye on this project.
Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 03:27 PM   #5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (126)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,843
Default

cool!
are u having th heads milled for more SCR?
NemeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 03:33 PM   #6
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joshiedoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between Bowling Green/Owensboro
Posts: 1,715
Default

Subscribed.

Looking good
Joshiedoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 03:41 PM   #7
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick G View Post
Keeping an eye on this project.
I'm shooting to have the old girl running for an April 18 TNT with my local region, so I should have some dyno results for you before then (keeping fingers crossed).

Quote:
Originally Posted by NemeSS View Post
cool!
are u having th heads milled for more SCR?
I hadn't planned on milling the heads at this point due to the aforementioned reliability concerns (I'm not wanting a super high compression motor for what I do with the car).

Thanks for the props guys.
01badz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 03:49 PM   #8
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
Brief Encounter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northwest Indiana (Highland)
Posts: 152
Default

Any particular reason that you went with an iron block?
Seems to like it would put you at a dis-advantage since you are adding 80lbs to the front of the car.
Brief Encounter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 03:53 PM   #9
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brief Encounter View Post
Any particular reason that you went with an iron block?
Seems to like it would put you at a dis-advantage since you are adding 80lbs to the front of the car.
Its 2008 spec aluminum block.
01badz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 04:03 PM   #10
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
formula17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: S.C.S Michigan
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brief Encounter View Post
Any particular reason that you went with an iron block?
Seems to like it would put you at a dis-advantage since you are adding 80lbs to the front of the car.
wtf looks pretty clear in the pics what the block is made of
formula17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 04:08 PM   #11
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
fknsmshn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Puyallup
Posts: 338
Default

<----In for the read.
fknsmshn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 05:55 PM   #12
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lampe, Mo
Posts: 371
Default

Awesome, I've got some Lingenfelter goodies on the way as well... Good luck with the build bud! My LS3 should arrive some time this week!
Brad Hutchcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 07:00 PM   #13
On The Tree
iTrader: (11)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 119
Default

I'm doing a similar swap into an FC RX-7 Good read!
Lurk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 07:05 PM   #14
TECH Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 607
Default

looks to be a good build! I got into AutoX last year and I can say it's addicting. Should be insane when it's done.
slammer454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 02:21 PM   #15
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
had20z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baytown/houston, tx
Posts: 399
Default

Bad ***... i got one of Nineballs L92s about 6 months ago....
had20z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 02:44 PM   #16
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 995
Default

good luck with the build. i don't know much about auto xing but i would like to try it. i don't know how f bodies compare;i would think weight would be an issue.not trying to hijack looking forward to seeing an ls3 prepped for track use
airforcemanss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 03:07 PM   #17
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by airforcemanss View Post
good luck with the build. i don't know much about auto xing but i would like to try it. i don't know how f bodies compare;i would think weight would be an issue.not trying to hijack looking forward to seeing an ls3 prepped for track use
In terms of autocross, this engine is complete overkill. When I start doing some HPDEs it will be a little more in its element.

When something breaks on this car, i like go with something bigger / better and the L92 was little too good to pass up.

F-bodies actually do pretty well, and there are a couple of SCCA classes where stock / mildly modified cars win regularly (FS and ESP). If you are interested, see if there is a local SCCA or NASA region near you and give it a shot.
01badz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 10:58 PM   #18
Launching!
iTrader: (39)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 252
Default

I'm a little confused... are you going to be running VVT or not because I saw the mention of LS3 Cam Gear and Cover which would mean you would have to get rid of the VVT making it a LS3 technically (except for intake and other things) not a L92.

Which PCM and Wiring harness are you using if you are keeping the VVT and are you keeping the stock gauges.

If I miss read anything then I apologize.

I am looking to put a L92 into a 01 WS6 and want to keep the stock gauges which rules out Mast Motorsports.
2SLO4ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 11:14 PM   #19
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
reds10406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 52
Default

Subscribed.
reds10406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 10:04 AM   #20
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SLO4ME View Post
I'm a little confused... are you going to be running VVT or not because I saw the mention of LS3 Cam Gear and Cover which would mean you would have to get rid of the VVT making it a LS3 technically (except for intake and other things) not a L92.

Which PCM and Wiring harness are you using if you are keeping the VVT and are you keeping the stock gauges.

If I miss read anything then I apologize.

I am looking to put a L92 into a 01 WS6 and want to keep the stock gauges which rules out Mast Motorsports.
I'm a bit of a stickler for calling a spade a spade - the block and heads are technically an L92, so to me it is an L92. However, I am NOT retaining the VVT so it may be closer to an LS3 (the heads are also using LS3 hollow stem valves) if that is how you differentiate it.

I am retaining the stock f-body wiring harness and using the Lingenfelter triggerbox to have the new engine communicate with the old PCM. AFAIK I should be able to keep the stock gauges with this arrangement.

Brief update: The L92 truck injectors WILL NOT fit into the L76 car intake. The LS1 injectors wouldn't fit either, even with the Katech spacer kit (although my LS1 injectors were pretty much garbage, anyway). I broke down and got a set of 39# injectors from FAST.

Looks like the car will be done (assuming nothing else comes up) in 2-3 weeks.
01badz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Project OVRKILL: The BLING Phase!!! LPE 403 Appearance & Detailing 902 10-19-2017 02:35 PM
25.2/25.3 good to 6.0 sec. C5 Corvette LSx Build dacajun Drag Racing Tech 92 05-19-2017 07:41 AM
Road race/drift Conquest swap Convette Conversions & Hybrids 173 03-02-2017 04:50 PM
Rear end leaking MIDNITE Z Gears & Axles 14 07-17-2016 10:00 AM
63# LS3 Style injectors Blackbuick 1987 Parts Classifieds 1 05-14-2016 12:44 PM


Tags
2000, 62l, asa, build, camaro, fuel, gm, injector, l92, lingenfelter, ls3, ls6, putting, tr220114lsa, video

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: