Why 6200 rev limiter for the LSA engine?
03-04-2011, 07:38 AM
#21
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got the automatic and with the tune it shifts just fine at 6,400 rpm.
03-10-2011, 03:17 PM
#23
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-15-2011, 05:53 AM
#25
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Google is your friend. Use your friend.
http://reviews.carreview.com/blog/ch...orvette-zr1/2/
http://www.media.gm.com/us/cadillac/...CTSVindex.html
LSA has 1.9L blower and a single brick IC, LS9 has a 2.3L blower and a dual brick IC as noted above.
Design goals were 620 hp for the '9 and 550 for the 'A. Generally the "platform people" (those responsible for the overall car) decide how much power/torque they need and Powertrain people deliver that.
If the Camaro ever gets the SC engine, my bet is the LSA, not the LS9.
http://reviews.carreview.com/blog/ch...orvette-zr1/2/
http://www.media.gm.com/us/cadillac/...CTSVindex.html
LSA has 1.9L blower and a single brick IC, LS9 has a 2.3L blower and a dual brick IC as noted above.
Design goals were 620 hp for the '9 and 550 for the 'A. Generally the "platform people" (those responsible for the overall car) decide how much power/torque they need and Powertrain people deliver that.
If the Camaro ever gets the SC engine, my bet is the LSA, not the LS9.
