Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Fast 102mm Intake--Real Results --NO BS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2009, 12:29 PM
  #61  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (125)
 
94 guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i wonder why katech don't step in and put in their 2cents or even the guy from comp?
Old 07-02-2009, 05:09 PM
  #62  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Guys, a 90mm TB will support over a 1000 RWHP without issue. That's almost a 3" opening.

The ported LS7 intake apparently is solid. Thanks for posting this real world test. Subscribing for future porting results.
Old 07-02-2009, 07:18 PM
  #63  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 8ByGoat
Don't really think this is a surprise.

But maybe with the bigger TB and you doing an all-out port job on the intake you will get some results.

After taking a closer look, you picked up some between 3800 and 4200 and then again at 6700-6900.

Curious as to the difference in conditions between the 2 runs?
+1 I see some visible gains. 10+ rwhp picked up in certain spots but only for brief times. Can't wait to see the fully ported version and larger TB.

Thanks for the HONEST numbers. Glad to see the numbers unfudged to post facts, vs fudged to sell intakes that as is don't make power across the board vs the ported ls7 intake.
Old 07-02-2009, 07:21 PM
  #64  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller
Guys, a 90mm TB will support over a 1000 RWHP without issue. That's almost a 3" opening.

The ported LS7 intake apparently is solid. Thanks for posting this real world test. Subscribing for future porting results.
I hear ya bro, but my 402 did pick up power (6 rwhp 17 rwtq) going from a 90mm ls2 tb to a 95 mm Rev Xtreme TB. Thanks Tracy for getting her to work for us. Mike at Vengeance nailed the tune too. Idles perfectly and some more technical stuff that I am not qualified to explain. LOL

*********SORRY FOR THE SMALL HIJACK************
Old 07-02-2009, 07:27 PM
  #65  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
8ByGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
+1 I see some visible gains. 10+ rwhp picked up in certain spots but only for brief times. Can't wait to see the fully ported version and larger TB.

Thanks for the HONEST numbers. Glad to see the numbers unfudged to post facts, vs fudged to sell intakes that as is don't make power across the board vs the ported ls7 intake.
You can go over to the Corvette Forums and search-there seems to be a little more testing and results being "published" over there.
Old 07-02-2009, 09:22 PM
  #66  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,455
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TLewis4095
This is more info than most were looking for I expect, but invaluable info when seeking to understand the reality behind flow numbers. If the intake charge does not flow with sufficient velocity to move through the entire "air pump" that our motors are, peak power cannot be realized.

As for the FAST 102 being worthwhile, independant testing such as Ragin's and company will be the real test and we may find that adding the 100mm TB may not do the trick.....but with the proper heads, cam profile, and exhaust as long as there is not a bottle neck or restriction in any of the key areas, I suspect we will see these make good power. If not, it will be a first for the FAST line of intake manifolds.
why they don't try dynotestingt the new Fast 102mm LS7 intake with a 90mm throttle body to see how it realy works regarding HP and the torque specialy Vs. 100mm throttle body.
Old 07-02-2009, 09:55 PM
  #67  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Good idea Abdullah.
Old 07-03-2009, 07:31 AM
  #68  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
veee8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Raleigh,North Carolina
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller
Guys, a 90mm TB will support over a 1000 RWHP without issue. That's almost a 3" opening.

The ported LS7 intake apparently is solid. Thanks for posting this real world test. Subscribing for future porting results.
Just to fuel that fire, I have made over 1000hp with a 78mm TB.
Old 07-03-2009, 11:05 AM
  #69  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
8ByGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

FWIW

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...g-reading.html

Made some good gains, but...........

Still not an apples to apples comparison because when they tested the LS7 intake they ran stock LS7 injectors. When they switched to the FAST they also switched the injectors to 60lbers.
Old 07-03-2009, 12:51 PM
  #70  
TECH Apprentice
 
JUNK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Westbank of N.O.
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Proof that we will buy f'n ANYTHING if it's HYPED enough and we have to wait long enough. Nothing like selling a product and going to production b4 it's proven. And don't expect the all the vendors to come clean, some are, after all, in bed w/ comp. Some just get a better shafting than others.
Old 07-03-2009, 03:15 PM
  #71  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JUNK
Proof that we will buy f'n ANYTHING if it's HYPED enough and we have to wait long enough. Nothing like selling a product and going to production b4 it's proven. And don't expect the all the vendors to come clean, some are, after all, in bed w/ comp. Some just get a better shafting than others.


WOW and I thought I was the only black sheep around here !!!!!!!!!!!!!

You got ***** to post it bro. Sponsor bashing is not permitted, ask me how I know.
Old 07-04-2009, 02:47 AM
  #72  
Teching In
 
Speedomotive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You will only see real beneficial results with the Fast 102mm Intake in larger forced induction applications and only slight gains in all-out high rpm race applications over a Fast 92mm.
Old 07-04-2009, 06:44 AM
  #73  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Speedomotive
You will only see real beneficial results with the Fast 102mm Intake in larger forced induction applications and only slight gains in all-out high rpm race applications over a Fast 92mm.
WTF: They don't even fit the same heads so you can't compare them. Go back to being a reader.
Old 07-04-2009, 07:12 AM
  #74  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by WKMCD
WTF: They don't even fit the same heads so you can't compare them. Go back to being a reader.
Play nice Kevin, he's only trying. Lets just stamp that post as:
FAIL !!!
Old 07-04-2009, 08:51 AM
  #75  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (23)
 
tektrans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Speedomotive
You will only see real beneficial results with the Fast 102mm Intake in larger forced induction applications and only slight gains in all-out high rpm race applications over a Fast 92mm.
haha, I guess you've done extensive reasearch and testing to come up with that statement.
Thanks, what would we all do without your valuable knowledge.
Old 07-04-2009, 08:07 PM
  #76  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by veee8
Just to fuel that fire, I have made over 1000hp with a 78mm TB.
FI Doesn't count. But I challenge Allgn to put that 90mm back on with his current tune and see what happens.

Last edited by 98Z28CobraKiller; 07-04-2009 at 08:16 PM.
Old 07-04-2009, 08:10 PM
  #77  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedomotive
You will only see real beneficial results with the Fast 102mm Intake in larger forced induction applications and only slight gains in all-out high rpm race applications over a Fast 92mm.
I got this post on the auto notification in my email and the first thought that came to mind was "this could get ugly"
Old 07-04-2009, 08:14 PM
  #78  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 94 guy
i wonder why katech don't step in and put in their 2cents or even the guy from comp?
I've never seen anyone from Comp/FAST comment on any FAST intake. It's kind of a lose lose for them to comment as doing so would essentially be trying to convince us that Ragin's real world test is wrong.

That thread in the corvette forums was inconclusive at best. I'm sticking with thiss thread as "The Best Real World Results to Date".
Old 07-05-2009, 03:05 AM
  #79  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller
FI Doesn't count. But I challenge Allgn to put that 90mm back on with his current tune and see what happens.
I'll bring it up with the guys at Vengeance on my next visit. If money keeps coming in I may be going back for susupension and something extra just for me. Not saying just yet. LOL.
Old 07-05-2009, 04:29 AM
  #80  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
TheBlackPlague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well............this is how i see it

Ls1 design was basic, Then they did the ls6. TADA, THEEEN we started porting the ls6!

THEEEEN aftermarket companies made intakes and we ported those!!

All the while GM was (Im almost POSITIVE) scooping up these "Ported intakes" and studing them and figuring out what makes them tick .

Fast forward from the first ls style intake through 1o plus years and countless versions from GM and aftermarket pieces, Gm makes the ls7

The way i see it is how many times can you revise one single design (ls style intake) before it really cant get any better?


Quick Reply: Fast 102mm Intake--Real Results --NO BS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.