Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Why do you have to swap out DOD lifters in non DOD applications?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2009, 01:04 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
95geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why do you have to swap out DOD lifters in non DOD applications?

I keep reading that you need to swap out the DOD lifters in an L92 for non DOD lifters but I have yet to hear the reasoning behind it. I've been searching without any luck, is there anyone that can fill me in?

I'm building a pretty much stock L92 with an L76 intake and a Mast Motorsports VVT cam for a rock crawler/racer.

Thanks!
Old 08-28-2009, 02:34 PM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
danf1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

l92/l76 lifters for the deactivateable (ha!) cylinders are heavier and more complicated. In fact, there are differing profiles for these lifters as compared to the lifters at cylinders that are not deactivated, due to differing compliance. the camshafts have smaller less aggressive profiles and lower rev limits due to the additional weight and complexity. If an aftermarket cam design is desired, with faster ramp rates, a lighter lifter is a necessity.
Old 08-28-2009, 05:21 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
scooter k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The locking pins on the DOD lifters are now to break and have broke on stock engines. Add a higher lift cam and the realibility goes even lower.
Old 08-29-2009, 03:05 AM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
rsz288's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Right here, right now!
Posts: 794
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 95geo
I keep reading that you need to swap out the DOD lifters in an L92 for non DOD lifters but I have yet to hear the reasoning behind it. I've been searching without any luck, is there anyone that can fill me in?

I'm building a pretty much stock L92 with an L76 intake and a Mast Motorsports VVT cam for a rock crawler/racer.

Thanks!
As DanF says, they are heavier. 30grams heavier, or a shade over an ounce.

An as ScooterK points out, all the valve train load rests on two itty bitty pins which have been reported to shear on stock engines. GM proves durability on these in a standard engine, but add cam and-or springs, and race it, then you are pushing your risks way up.

Would you agree its a good idea to change them?

Old 09-01-2009, 12:46 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
95geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info guys, I figured there had to be a real reason for not running them I just havent heard it yet. Looks like I'll be tearing the engine down again.
Old 09-02-2009, 12:11 AM
  #6  
Formerly darynC-10/23/10
iTrader: (19)
 
Daryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: gonzales louisiana
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

DOD lifters have alot more to them. they dont like spring pressure of high lifts or high rpms...its recommended you change them when going to a bigger camshaft of soemhting with a lift over 600
Old 09-02-2009, 01:14 AM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
rsz288's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Right here, right now!
Posts: 794
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 95geo
Thanks for the info guys, I figured there had to be a real reason for not running them I just havent heard it yet. Looks like I'll be tearing the engine down again.
FYI pic here:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/9651785-post8.html



Quick Reply: Why do you have to swap out DOD lifters in non DOD applications?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 AM.