Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

433ci out of a LS3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2009, 01:03 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SteelmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 433ci out of a LS3

I picked up a LS3 block pretty cheap and I am trying to decided what to do with it. Any suggestions? I already have a whole procharger kit setting at home, minus the F1A that is going to complete it.

414-418
or 433?

Is there any problems with making a 433 out of it?
Old 10-10-2009, 01:28 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
chevroletfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just had a 427 built from an L92 block. Due to the length of the cylinder I cannot add ANY power adders. I would assume the same goes for the LS3 block.
Old 10-10-2009, 01:29 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SteelmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chevroletfreak
I just had a 427 built from an L92 block. Due to the length of the cylinder I cannot add ANY power adders. I would assume the same goes for the LS3 block.
Hmmm that's really interesting... Does anyone else have any more information about this?
Old 10-10-2009, 02:11 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

strength might be an issue at 433ci an FI.

Wouldn't a 418ci be better for that level of boost than a big 433ci?

Short stroke and smaller bore for strength.

.
Old 10-10-2009, 02:12 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SteelmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
strength might be an issue at 433ci an FI.

Wouldn't a 418ci be better for that level of boost than a big 433ci?

.
Yeah maybe so. I was just trying to get a bigger CI, that way I can run lower boost and have it last a lot longer lol.
Old 10-10-2009, 02:43 PM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SteelmanLS1
Yeah maybe so. I was just trying to get a bigger CI, that way I can run lower boost and have it last a lot longer lol.
Yeah, me and my stepfather are building a big ole signle turbo set-up. I kept wanting to do a 427 or a 434 but everyone that knows their stuff kept telling me to build a smaller cube engine. Not only because it simply works better with boost, the stroke being shorter and bore being smaller is better for strength and reliability......and longevity.

There's shops with 1600 fwhp streetable daily driver set-ups using 402ci LSX engines. Their bigger 427 and 454 LSX blocked engines just use MUCH bigger turbos...but then you're talking upwards of 2,300 fwhp daily driver engines.

All you need is that 400-418ci LS3 engine and you'll get more out of that sc'er. It'll be very reliable for 1,000 RWHP, just have it tuned properly.

.
Old 10-10-2009, 02:47 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SteelmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think I will just go with the original 6.0L Iron block then.
Old 10-10-2009, 09:07 PM
  #8  
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

416 from an LS3 would be good
Old 10-10-2009, 09:16 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SteelmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
416 from an LS3 would be good
Wouldnt get much if any more HP than a 408 though. Cost me more LOL. But in the end I think the 408 under 16+PSI would hold up better
Old 10-10-2009, 09:23 PM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well you asked about an LS3 so I was answering that question.

Bigger engines will make more power but 8 cubes isnt a big difference. The 408 will definately be less money to build and iron is more durable than aluminum so yes to both, no arugument there at all.
Old 10-10-2009, 09:25 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SteelmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
Well you asked about an LS3 so I was answering that question.

Bigger engines will make more power but 8 cubes isnt a big difference. The 408 will definately be less money to build and iron is more durable than aluminum so yes to both, no arugument there at all.
Well I found a LS3 block for cheap but when I looked at it, it would have to be decked slightly and bore it to 4.080 to be any good. So since I would of had to deck it I decided to pass on it.
Old 10-10-2009, 11:40 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SteelmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is there a problem with Decking a LS3 block slightly to clean it up?
Old 10-11-2009, 12:27 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
93ls7z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oak Ridge, Missouri
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No problem decking that block
Old 10-11-2009, 12:28 AM
  #14  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SteelmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 93ls7z
No problem decking that block
Yep, that's what I heard. I am going to go look at it monday and I will know more.
Old 10-13-2009, 10:27 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (83)
 
Gray86hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Battle Creek Mi
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I am building a 420. 4" arm with 4.080. This is going to be a NA motor. I am using a l92 block.

Just trying to get the rest of my ford stuff sold to get the lsx stuff.

Tim
Old 10-13-2009, 11:05 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
Yeah, me and my stepfather are building a big ole signle turbo set-up. I kept wanting to do a 427 or a 434 but everyone that knows their stuff kept telling me to build a smaller cube engine. Not only because it simply works better with boost, the stroke being shorter and bore being smaller is better for strength and reliability......and longevity.

There's shops with 1600 fwhp streetable daily driver set-ups using 402ci LSX engines. Their bigger 427 and 454 LSX blocked engines just use MUCH bigger turbos...but then you're talking upwards of 2,300 fwhp daily driver engines.

All you need is that 400-418ci LS3 engine and you'll get more out of that sc'er. It'll be very reliable for 1,000 RWHP, just have it tuned properly.

.
I would love to live in your world. But I don't think there is much room there with your imagination taking it all up..



Quick Reply: 433ci out of a LS3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.