Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Quench for 4.125", 16 psi?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2010, 11:12 AM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Gannet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Quench for 4.125", 16 psi?

What's the suggested quench for a 4.125" bore run at 16 psi?
Old 02-01-2010, 12:42 PM
  #2  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Normally, for a naturally aspirated or nitrous engine, you can set quench distance at about .040" and be okay.

However, on a boosted engine, some people have claimed that larger distances (.050-.100") actually help make more power.
Old 02-01-2010, 04:49 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Gannet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Normally, for a naturally aspirated or nitrous engine, you can set quench distance at about .040" and be okay.

However, on a boosted engine, some people have claimed that larger distances (.050-.100") actually help make more power.
Now that's very interesting. I wondered if it might be different for a FI engine, which is why I asked.

Anyone have any comments as to why this might or might not be true?
Old 02-02-2010, 10:36 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
jmm98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KS
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

A lot of the big nitrous guys are saying the same thing....running .080"+ gives a bigger tuning window and makes more power than the tighter stuff NA motors usually run. I'm not smart enough to know why though.
Old 02-02-2010, 11:00 AM
  #5  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gannet
Now that's very interesting. I wondered if it might be different for a FI engine, which is why I asked.

Anyone have any comments as to why this might or might not be true?
If I had to guess, I would think it helps to "tame" the combustion in this type of application.

With a super/turbocharged engine, the cylinders are much more densely packed with fuel and air, and the combustion is a lot quicker. Imagine lighting a brush fire in the desert, versus a dense forest. Which fire speads quicker?

I would guess, that the crevices in the quench area cause peak pressures to be a lot higher than the rest of the chamber, probably inducing detonation. That could probably even explain why the Hemi chamber is the standard in T/F and T/A classes, as there is basically no quench area at all.

I'm probably wrong though. lol
Old 02-02-2010, 12:53 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (104)
 
helicoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,837
Received 279 Likes on 106 Posts

Default

I will run the quench around .060" on alot of BBC N20 engines I do for the reason of minimizing the speed at which the burn across the chamber/piston heads takes place. The 'theory' is it helps control detonation, if that is possible on a N20 engine. I have also had good luck on 400 shot and bigger BBCs with the larger combustion chambers - 115cc and up. Sometimes to good/small of a chamber design and quench can promote too fast of a burn and make it more of an explosion than a slow burn leading into detonation.

I would assume these things would apply to the LS engines.....

I did my 403 Procharged engine at .041" quench because I didn't want to spend for special thickness H.G.'s and it was fine at 14-15 psi - pump gas and meth - when I tore it down. It didn't like more than 16* WOT.

Would have been interesting to play with the quench (open it up) and run it again to see if it would tolerate more timing.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.