Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

main bolts replacement necessary?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2010, 05:13 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
skinumback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 125
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts

Default main bolts replacement necessary?

I am about to get my 6.0 iron block machined and was wondering if its necessary to replace the main bolts. Every one says a torque to yeild faster must be replaced every time its used?? Thanks
Old 09-21-2010, 12:19 AM
  #2  
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
iTrader: (12)
 
-Joseph-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas and Qatar
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Main bolts are not torque-to-yield, although do rely on an angle-torque procedure for accurate bolt clamping loads (base torque of 16lb feet on all, then 80 degrees inner 13mm bolts, 53 degrees on outer 15mm stud bolts).

That being said, I myself do not like reusing main bolts that have been "run" and will replace them with new or take-out bolts that have not been heat cycled. I've had older '98-99 LS main bolts feel like they were stretching excessively by not "feeling" tight after doing the torque angle procedure, put in new bolts and that problem went away.

FWIW that specific torque sequence should leave the bolts at about 58-62lb feet of torque if you happen to check.
Old 09-22-2010, 01:05 AM
  #3  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (64)
 
CalSpeedPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Using an electronic torque wrench that shows torque during angle-torqueing, I have tested the exact difference with "used" and "new" main bolts on the exact same main caps.

The torque reading was exactly the same between the two at proper torque angle. Both read right at 60lb of torque (both inside and outside main bolts which use different amounts of angle torque)


I still recommend replacing new as well.

Last edited by CalSpeedPerformance; 09-22-2010 at 11:39 AM.
Old 09-22-2010, 09:15 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
ND400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Unless they are new and never ran, replace. Also don't use ARP moly grease on them. It's something most beginners don't know. But if used it will over torque the bolt and it may break during operation
Old 09-22-2010, 04:06 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
skinumback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 125
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by -Joseph-
Main bolts are not torque-to-yield, although do rely on an angle-torque procedure for accurate bolt clamping loads (base torque of 16lb feet on all, then 80 degrees inner 13mm bolts, 53 degrees on outer 15mm stud bolts).

That being said, I myself do not like reusing main bolts that have been "run" and will replace them with new or take-out bolts that have not been heat cycled. I've had older '98-99 LS main bolts feel like they were stretching excessively by not "feeling" tight after doing the torque angle procedure, put in new bolts and that problem went away.

FWIW that specific torque sequence should leave the bolts at about 58-62lb feet of torque if you happen to check.
Thanks, I will plan on getting new ones? What is the best lube to apply to the bottom of the bolt heads to get the propper clamping force?
Old 09-22-2010, 07:11 PM
  #6  
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
iTrader: (12)
 
-Joseph-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas and Qatar
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've always just used clean engine oil for stock bolts.



Quick Reply: main bolts replacement necessary?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM.