Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

My combo. Tell me what cam and such.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2010, 09:22 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
allblowdup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 242
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default My combo. Tell me what cam and such.

Ls3 block
ls3 heads tsp porting or left alone if there really isn't much to gain at that low rpm.
4.125 stroke
4.070 bore
10.4 comp
750 hp holley

Application is a jet boat. Max rpm 5500-6000. Looking for max torque 5200-5500. Low rpm drivebilty not a concern, spends 90% of the time at 4000 rpm or higher.

Cam I have now is a 226/236 .525/.525 110lc. Was thinking of going tsp 229/236 .625/.612 111 cl or the 231/238 cam that tehy offer.

Thoughts?
Old 10-27-2010, 11:59 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
blackonblack02_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Shawnee (Shawmpton), OKlahoma
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

call cammotion
Old 10-28-2010, 12:28 AM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (20)
 
Devils Mentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Inside Your Girlfriend
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rich at WCCH or PatG are the the guys to talk to for LS3/L92 cam specs


DM
Old 10-28-2010, 05:42 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
ringram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny London, UK
Posts: 1,691
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The difference between the cams you mention wont make enough difference to change.

Without knowing your intake design you are grasping at straws and asking for random useless answers from people who can only guess.
Old 10-28-2010, 09:21 AM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
allblowdup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 242
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Right must have missed that one.
It is a single plane Victor jr.

The reason I ask is most guys usually have a problem figuring out the right cam for this application. Even in the the old sbc world it is not as cut and dried as it might seem. I can get away with really tight l/c wich is good but not a ton of lift. Beeing that these heads have been know to fusy for cam specs I thouight maybe I could get a little insight into what seems to be working so far.

Maybe Pat G will chime in.
Old 10-28-2010, 09:58 AM
  #6  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Maybe Pat G will chime in.
Maybe. But for a few bones you can pay him to spec you a custom grind dialed in for your needs
Old 10-28-2010, 10:22 AM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
allblowdup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 242
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yes, and I probably will but I am just looking for tendensies at the moment and the reasons that the hundreds of cams produced and on the shelf are not a proper fit for this engine.
So far from what I understand most of the off the shelf cams are made for factory style intakes. They require different l/c, duration amounts , and lifts than carbed intakes. Also alot of them are for cathederal port heads that again reguire different l/c , durations, and lifts. Then there is my application which is more of a steady state running engine that requires huge amounts of tq at a given rpm (5500) but the engine will never need power past 6000 rpm. Typically we end up with a cam that is pretty big and heads that are fairly small in order to maximize tq at our predetermined rpm. Sounds easy but it is amazing how easy it is to get it wrong.

So I have $ to spend and I am just getting informed in order to make my decision and yes I probably will end up with a custom grind.



Quick Reply: My combo. Tell me what cam and such.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 PM.