408 Iron Block on Budget?
Is is possible to build a 408(LQ4 or 9 Block) longblock for under 6k? Looking for a good streetable motor(450-500rwhp through an M6) with either LS6 port heads or L92/LS3 heads.
Trevor
Texas Speed and Performance
You really don't need a $6K 408 longblock to make a 450-500 rwhp street engine from a 6.0L iron block truck engine. Heresy? Perhaps, but here are some thoulghts:
A 408 is only 12% larger than a 364 (stock 6.0L). If both a 364 and a 408 have about the same top end (heads intake), the 408 will be hard pressed to make 12% more hp than the 364. It may well make 12% more max torque, say about 50 lb-ft more, but at what cost?
A stock (used even) 6.0L LQ4 with a rod bolt upgrade is good for well over 7000 rpm (which you won't need to spin to get your hp goal). Block and rotating parts are not hp limited in these engines until lots more than you want, and it's rpm that loads the crank and rods, not NA power.
So, buy a used LQ4, change the rod bolts and spend your money on the L92 topend. You may want to change bearings and rering it, but many 50,000+ truck LQs don't even need that. This may fly in the face of "conventional" thinking, but it is working well for a number of street and race engines I am familiar with. GM did a really good job on the OEM longblock.
Your choice of who does the L92 heads and what all they need is critical. Some folks do L92s very well and a fair number don't do much to help them. Some even hurt them probably because they don't understand how/why they work well.
As for valvetrain, stock lifters, rockers (perhaps with a Comp or other trunnion bearing replacement) and valves will work. Your valvetrain person might go for lighter steel intakes. Not a bad idea as they reduce the spring loads required to maintain valvetrain control. The cam needs to be matched to the application and especially to the springs, retainers and pushrods. Think light on the springs and retainers, and big and beefy on the pushrods.
If you have a decent LQ4 longblock, you might reach your goal for the $6K total cost, not the longblock/shortblock cost you mentioned. At least spend half of the $6K on the top end.
To paraphrase a quote attributed to Willie Sutton, the bank robber: "Why spend your money on heads? Because that's where the power is."
Good luck.
Jon
Lq9 used engine-600
L92s heads-800
Studs main/head -400
Carb intake 400
Stroke kit tsp 402ci-2100
Cam 400
Valvesprings-200
Block hone-250
Conversion flywheel-400
Msd6010-350
Total-5900
All prices are rounded up. This is what I have in my motor so far. Long block can definitely be done for under 6000. I pretty much built the whole engine for that much. Granted there's gonna be other costs gaskets brackets bolts etc. But it can definitely be done. Of course you save a ton by doing the work yourself and buying used parts. Hope this helps!
Trending Topics
However, my list of "little stuff" is a lot bigger than most because I'm doing an LS swap into a thirdgen. If you're putting this stuff into a car that's already got an LS, your pile of "little stuff" would be significantly reduced and I could see your expenses being way lower than mine.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
However, my list of "little stuff" is a lot bigger than most because I'm doing an LS swap into a thirdgen. If you're putting this stuff into a car that's already got an LS, your pile of "little stuff" would be significantly reduced and I could see your expenses being way lower than mine.
A 408 is only 12% larger than a 364 (stock 6.0L). If both a 364 and a 408 have about the same top end (heads intake), the 408 will be hard pressed to make 12% more hp than the 364. It may well make 12% more max torque, say about 50 lb-ft more, but at what cost?
A stock (used even) 6.0L LQ4 with a rod bolt upgrade is good for well over 7000 rpm (which you won't need to spin to get your hp goal). Block and rotating parts are not hp limited in these engines until lots more than you want, and it's rpm that loads the crank and rods, not NA power.
So, buy a used LQ4, change the rod bolts and spend your money on the L92 topend. You may want to change bearings and rering it, but many 50,000+ truck LQs don't even need that. This may fly in the face of "conventional" thinking, but it is working well for a number of street and race engines I am familiar with. GM did a really good job on the OEM longblock.
Your choice of who does the L92 heads and what all they need is critical. Some folks do L92s very well and a fair number don't do much to help them. Some even hurt them probably because they don't understand how/why they work well.
As for valvetrain, stock lifters, rockers (perhaps with a Comp or other trunnion bearing replacement) and valves will work. Your valvetrain person might go for lighter steel intakes. Not a bad idea as they reduce the spring loads required to maintain valvetrain control. The cam needs to be matched to the application and especially to the springs, retainers and pushrods. Think light on the springs and retainers, and big and beefy on the pushrods.
If you have a decent LQ4 longblock, you might reach your goal for the $6K total cost, not the longblock/shortblock cost you mentioned. At least spend half of the $6K on the top end.
To paraphrase a quote attributed to Willie Sutton, the bank robber: "Why spend your money on heads? Because that's where the power is."
Good luck.
Jon
50 foot pounds of TQ down low is very nice in a real car as well and cubes equal more tq until the heads and manifold give up.
Still everything you are saying Jon is correct and you can make a good amount of NA power with the stock GM OEM shortblock. The rings are very low tension and the pistons seal up well and make good power.
The only thing I don't like is the lack of P to V but with the shorter L92/LS3 events it is not that bad and with good valvetrain the parts don't usually crash too much.
NOS or power adders and the stock pistons are not so good so you might as well go bigger then since its not so bad if the entire engine is getting rebuilt anyway.
Also in over ten years of having people build multiple engines I have never heard people say "this engine is just too big and has too much power down lower! I think I will build a much smaller engine next time!"
Just haven't ever heard that yet and in fact they always go the other way and also always go faster and have nicer street rides.
Also in over ten years of having people build multiple engines I have never heard people say "this engine is just too big and has too much power down lower! I think I will build a much smaller engine next time!"
Just haven't ever heard that yet and in fact they always go the other way and also always go faster and have nicer street rides.
Have you also heard, "Gee, it makes all the power I originally wanted and cost a bunch less than I thought it would!"
There is something to be said for that reaction.
If the owner needs to brag on the (stock) shortblock, he can always truthfully say, "I had the biggest LS engine shop in the world do the short block."

Jon
There is something to be said for that reaction.
If the owner needs to brag on the (stock) shortblock, he can always truthfully say, "I had the biggest LS engine shop in the world do the short block."

Jon
The bigger stuff also always makes more power and makes it easier. Been there done that a 1000 times.
Again like you said in econo mode staying stock is always cheaper but that's hardly a revelation or anything.
Any kind of power adder or a seriously larger cam and the stock shortblock pistons go south in a hurry when those glass pistons let go.
Often they take the entire engine with them. Then it's not so cheap anymore.














