What should be my total timing
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: STATESVILLE N.C
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am building a ls2 carb race motor ,11.1 compression ,will be sprayed,has 58 tooth on the crank using 6012 msd box,what is usably the total timing set up on motor no nitrous just on motor.my sbc and bbc motors ran good between 35 to 40 degree on motor ,is ls motors different????
#3
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Yeppoon, Qld. Australia
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ls3 engines will make best power close to 30 but won't last that long at that. We run 28 deg and WOT for periods of 40 min straight on Av gas or 26 on premium at 2000ft. Anymore and the pistons go bye bye.
#6
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am building a ls2 carb race motor ,11.1 compression ,will be sprayed,has 58 tooth on the crank using 6012 msd box,what is usably the total timing set up on motor no nitrous just on motor.my sbc and bbc motors ran good between 35 to 40 degree on motor ,is ls motors different????
You got a carb'ed LS motor? Don't bother giving advice if you don't, cause you're just rehashing someone else's cr@p. I do have a carb'ed LS motor, and it does like 36° "mechanical". I also have another 14° "vacuum" advance added by a MAP sensor for 50° total. FYI, the longer manifold runners and relatively poor fuel atomization require more advance than an equivalent port injected engine.
#7
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Your GF's pants
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You really should hang around in the carb forum where you'll hear from peeps who actually have experience...
You got a carb'ed LS motor? Don't bother giving advice if you don't, cause you're just rehashing someone else's cr@p. I do have a carb'ed LS motor, and it does like 36° "mechanical". I also have another 14° "vacuum" advance added by a MAP sensor for 50° total. FYI, the longer manifold runners and relatively poor fuel atomization require more advance than an equivalent port injected engine.
You got a carb'ed LS motor? Don't bother giving advice if you don't, cause you're just rehashing someone else's cr@p. I do have a carb'ed LS motor, and it does like 36° "mechanical". I also have another 14° "vacuum" advance added by a MAP sensor for 50° total. FYI, the longer manifold runners and relatively poor fuel atomization require more advance than an equivalent port injected engine.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Yeppoon, Qld. Australia
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You really should hang around in the carb forum where you'll hear from peeps who actually have experience...
You got a carb'ed LS motor? Don't bother giving advice if you don't, cause you're just rehashing someone else's cr@p. I do have a carb'ed LS motor, and it does like 36° "mechanical". I also have another 14° "vacuum" advance added by a MAP sensor for 50° total. FYI, the longer manifold runners and relatively poor fuel atomization require more advance than an equivalent port injected engine.
You got a carb'ed LS motor? Don't bother giving advice if you don't, cause you're just rehashing someone else's cr@p. I do have a carb'ed LS motor, and it does like 36° "mechanical". I also have another 14° "vacuum" advance added by a MAP sensor for 50° total. FYI, the longer manifold runners and relatively poor fuel atomization require more advance than an equivalent port injected engine.