Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

LS3 vs. L92 heads...whats the difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 09:52 AM
  #1  
streetknight2's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 1
Default LS3 vs. L92 heads...whats the difference?

I know the ls3 has hollow intake valves, but what are the other differences. I see a bunch of people using L92's but not many ls3
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 10:04 AM
  #2  
DietCoke's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 60
From: Richmond Hill, GA
Default

LS3s have hollow intake valves, and the newer ones have better valve springs with a little more seat/open pressure (the blue springs). The rest of the port/casting is the same.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 01:40 PM
  #3  
Gray86hatch's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 4
From: Battle Creek Mi
Default

Go with the LS3 the hollow valves are really a good thing to have if you are running any type of cam.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 10:05 PM
  #4  
SSLSXLQ9L92's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Venus (DFW) TX
Default

The hollow stem valves are weaker than the solid valves. Big cams and heavy springs are hard on them. My head porter recommended L92's. Just sayin.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 10:08 PM
  #5  
Tainted's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Default

I dont know why he told you that. When I read of people talking of valvetrain lighter is always better. It allows for better valve control and stability.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 12:26 AM
  #6  
chuckd71's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 22
From: Nashville / Tampa
Default

For 99.9% of builds is it going to matter either way?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 12:45 AM
  #7  
Leeroyws6's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Default

stronger is better in valvetrain.parts are small, so light weight really means nothing except in rotating assembly.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 02:19 AM
  #8  
DietCoke's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 60
From: Richmond Hill, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Leeroyws6
stronger is better in valvetrain.parts are small, so light weight really means nothing except in rotating assembly.
Your advice giving card has just been revoked.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 06:16 AM
  #9  
Gray86hatch's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 4
From: Battle Creek Mi
Default

Wow this sounds like a mustang site with the newest 18 year old giving sound engine design advice.

Guess you need to call and start consulting for NHRA prostock. They have it all wrong.

Google is your friend not what your buddies uncle that worked in NASCAR told you.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 06:28 AM
  #10  
rsz288's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 828
Likes: 12
From: Right here, right now!
Default

Originally Posted by DietCoke
Your advice giving card has just been revoked.
ROFL.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 07:14 AM
  #11  
Patrick G's Avatar
LS1 Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,246
Likes: 34
From: Victoria, TX
Default

The trend for making power over the broadest rpm range is to have the lightest, stiffest, strongest valvetrain you can. The lightest valves & rockers, the stiffest pushrods, the strongest springs. You need valve control along with fast opening and closing of the valves. Always go for the lightest valves you can afford that will last. Weight is the enemy and trust me, those stock L92 valves are HEAVY.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 07:15 AM
  #12  
Tainted's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Default

For real! Some people have no idea wtf they are talking about so they just regergitate random bits of false info.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 07:37 AM
  #13  
streetknight2's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 1
Default

So I take it the LS3 head would be the better choice of the 2? Trying to decide between the PRC stage 2.5 5.3 heads and the PRC ported l92's which I could order with the lighter valves for my LQ4 build.

Car is 3100# carb, th350, 8" converter and 4.10 gears.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 08:13 AM
  #14  
Tainted's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Default

The ls3 heads certainly flow better. You may want to consider milling them .020 - .030 for better compression ratio
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 08:32 AM
  #15  
WheelsUp84z's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 4
From: Concord, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
The ls3 heads certainly flow better. You may want to consider milling them .020 - .030 for better compression ratio
Over the 5.3's yes. However, l92/ls3 heads might be too much for a smaller CI motor with a pumpgas friendly setup, out of the box they are 260cc intake runners. I personally wouldnt reccommend them (ported version) for anything less than 400 cubic inches.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 10:54 AM
  #16  
tex1978's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Tyler, Texas
Default

Yeah I was gonna say unless you are building a stroker of some sort then you dont need them ported. I have a set of LS3 heads in the floor here and ordered another set last night due to a little issue. 821 or 832 heads are the same casting (like 243's and 799's), just depends on what the head went on as to what valve it got, least thats my understanding. There have been reports of Camaros having 823 casting heads but Im sure they have the hollow intake valve. Lighter is BETTER.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 09:44 PM
  #17  
litle88's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 4
From: Burbank, Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by DietCoke
Your advice giving card has just been revoked.
Lmfao!!

There seems to be a migration of these guys from somewhere that have NO CLUE! I wonder where they are from?

Diet you kill me!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 12:34 PM
  #18  
streetknight2's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 1
Default

well I went LS3...got my fingers crossed.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 12:41 PM
  #19  
Tainted's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by streetknight2
well I went LS3...got my fingers crossed.
clearly the better of the choices. good luck!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 12:59 PM
  #20  
streetknight2's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
clearly the better of the choices. good luck!
Now gotta figure out cam. I called comp and they spec'd a monster lol.

255/267 --------624/624------108

What do you guys think. It will be carb with vic jr, 3100# car, 4.10 gears 8 " converter, etc.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 PM.