Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Ported 243 heads versus stock L92

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2013, 10:37 PM
  #21  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

That has to be one of the best 2nd Gen Camaro's I have seen. Very nice inside and out.
Old 04-28-2013, 10:56 PM
  #22  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RobsZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
I see this thread has been resurrected.
Last year I changed to a 4150-style EFI intake with a GM-compatible Throttle body. This lets me me use a retro-style 14" air filter and the "air injection" off the windshield and through the hood. It looks like this:

This change boosted my speed by 3 mph (to 117) and lowered by ET by .2 sec.
What is the LSA and specs on the cam you are using? I'm also considering switching from a LS6 intake to a Victor Jr with a 4150 t/b. 3mph and .2 sec seem like a real good improvement.

Last edited by RobsZ28; 04-28-2013 at 11:03 PM.
Old 04-28-2013, 11:28 PM
  #23  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
mrvedit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 7,120
Received 424 Likes on 323 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RobsZ28
What is the LSA and specs on the cam you are using? I'm also considering switching from a LS6 intake to a Victor Jr with a 4150 t/b. 3mph and .2 sec seem like a real good improvement.
I currently have the Comp Cams 54-459-11 in it. It has 231/239 duration (@ .050) with .617/.624 lift and a 113 LSA. The Piston-To-Valve clearance is only .045 in my LS2. Plenty of torque - I spin my 17" Nitto DR and will have to get a new set of 15" MT to have any chance of hooking.

The engine came with a custom cam - 231/237 with .612/.607 lift and a very tight 111 LSA. While it has a bit more top end, it was very difficult to tune. I prefer the 54-459-11. Note this requires dual valve springs and creates a noisy valve train.
Old 04-29-2013, 12:38 AM
  #24  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RobsZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
I currently have the Comp Cams 54-459-11 in it. It has 231/239 duration (@ .050) with .617/.624 lift and a 113 LSA. The Piston-To-Valve clearance is only .045 in my LS2. Plenty of torque - I spin my 17" Nitto DR and will have to get a new set of 15" MT to have any chance of hooking.

The engine came with a custom cam - 231/237 with .612/.607 lift and a very tight 111 LSA. While it has a bit more top end, it was very difficult to tune. I prefer the 54-459-11. Note this requires dual valve springs and creates a noisy valve train.
Yours has less duration but more lift then I have, mine is 238/242 .605"/.610" with a 113 lsa. I was told to stay away from a single plane and a 4150 because of the 113 lsa but I think I'm going to get it now since they seem to work well on your setup.
Old 04-29-2013, 06:51 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Tunink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I spun my L92 heads with stock valves to 7400-7600 (on occastion). LS7 lifters, trunion upgraded rockers, and .675 lift springs.

Imo the growing room you gain with L92/LS3 heads is worth it alone. I would also bet theres a good possibility stock L92 heads probably flow the same if not more than your ported 243.
Old 04-29-2013, 02:53 PM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Tunink.. Intake and cam?

Max power at what rpm?
Old 04-29-2013, 08:10 PM
  #27  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Tunink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Tunink.. Intake and cam?

Max power at what rpm?
Unported Vic Jr. TSP 251/259 .660 lift.

On motor it fell off about 7k. On the bottle it made power beyond 7400. Just didn't want to spin it that high for a super long amount of time.
Old 04-29-2013, 08:31 PM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Ah.. I didn't see it spinning that high with an l76..

Did you ever have it set up with an l76?
Old 05-03-2013, 01:00 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Tunink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Ah.. I didn't see it spinning that high with an l76..

Did you ever have it set up with an l76?
Never did. Sold the L76, bought a LY6 for $600 as a complete longblock with intake/TB/sensors/coilpacks, and I'm going with that.

I should have my car back together within the next month or so.
Old 03-19-2014, 09:17 AM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (91)
 
zman1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas Tx
Posts: 651
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
I see this thread has been resurrected.

I'm confident I can get 119 mph and 11.5 ET out of it soon.

Sorry, I don't have any videos of the car. I do have this picture of the inside:

that is one nice clean interior- looks better than new! what seats are these?
they dont look stock to me



Quick Reply: Ported 243 heads versus stock L92



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.