Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

To vvt or not to vvt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2012 | 09:15 PM
  #21  
1989GTA's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 11
Default

Good numbers with an unreal torque curve. I take it with stock L99 heads and a 6L80E. I just hope my numbers are as good when I am done. I will also be using the Yank SS3200. How does it drive?
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2012 | 09:23 PM
  #22  
Gus 82's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: North East Ohio
Default

Yea that looks pretty promising, Guys on some of the other forums say yank it out and go with standard cam but with so many OEM's putting it in the engines there has to be something there. Hoping I can sort this out. I think the older style phaser fixes my problem and I dont need to buy a new cam I can get HP tuners and try and tune it or put the extra cash to a nitrous kit.....
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2012 | 11:33 PM
  #23  
futureuser's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 1
Default

Other oems can vary exhaust and intake valve timing independently. There is a huge advantage to doing this. The first vvt systems on imports would only vary intake valve timing, not both at the same time. Even these earliest systems on imports are superior to what's on the "LS" system. LS3, LS7, LSA, LS9 all exclude vvt. The "LS" vvt system is to help gm meet cafe fuel economy standards.

Last edited by futureuser; Jul 8, 2012 at 11:39 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 07:14 AM
  #24  
pharmd's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 1989GTA
Couple of thoughts.

1. You are comparing a supercharged application to a NA application.
2. Do you think GM and other manufacturos would go to all the trouble of installing a VVT system in their motors if there was not something to it?
1) just giving my experiences with the topic...it was on a SC application the point is still valid, VVT didn't do jack.
2) How many things have manufacturers done throughout the years that turned out to be just a fad? Its like saying everyone's doing it so it must work. I got rid of DOD and VVT and the car made more power, back to back apples to apples...period, in my experience its all marketing.

Also, we need good data. I realize most folks aren't going to take the time or money to compare cams, but its really the only way to get a clear picture of what parts "actually" do and don't make power in each application. Posting up a graph saying I made xx power more vs my stock cam isn't helpful...you could have made the same (OR MORE) power increase by using a non-VVT cam. I am just trying to provide honest real world experiences on the topic.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 08:56 AM
  #25  
Scoggin Dickey's Avatar
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 35
From: Lubbock, TX
Default

Originally Posted by pharmd
1) just giving my experiences with the topic...it was on a SC application the point is still valid, VVT didn't do jack.
2) How many things have manufacturers done throughout the years that turned out to be just a fad? Its like saying everyone's doing it so it must work. I got rid of DOD and VVT and the car made more power, back to back apples to apples...period, in my experience its all marketing.

Also, we need good data. I realize most folks aren't going to take the time or money to compare cams, but its really the only way to get a clear picture of what parts "actually" do and don't make power in each application. Posting up a graph saying I made xx power more vs my stock cam isn't helpful...you could have made the same (OR MORE) power increase by using a non-VVT cam. I am just trying to provide honest real world experiences on the topic.
Advancing and/or retarding a cam isn't a fad or marketing scheme, it's been used effectively for as long as anyone in performance can remember to move the powerband around. The benefit can not be argued. Peak gains in HP an TQ will vary, some will see quite a bit and some will not see as much if any. To me that's irrelevant as IMO that's just a bonus to the most useful advantage of VVT which is broadening the power range.
__________________

800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice


Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 09:52 AM
  #26  
Gus 82's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: North East Ohio
Default

So I'm going to order a custom cam today. After doing a ton of article reading I am going to stay with the VVT. I will post my current cam for sale after the swap which would be good for a Reg cab or lighter car... Just not a 4x4 ext cab 4.8 trying to pull a 5500 boat trailer......I agree with scoggin, in any v8 app advance it in the Low RPM or retard for Upper RPM has been around forever. Even though most guys dont degree a cam doesnt mean you are getting the full potential. I like the idea of being able to do this without changing keys and not being locked into having to choose where I want my power. The Specs of the cam I am going with are 189 core vvt, 210/224 @.050, .556/568 and a 112 + 5 intake advance.. With or without vvt I think these specs should give my little 4.8 a good low RPM boost.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 10:49 AM
  #27  
Gus 82's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: North East Ohio
Default

Any thoughts on the new cam specs think it should give me more bottom end? 210/224 @.050, .556/568 and a 112 + 5 vs currently installed 219/228 .550/.550 114
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 11:43 AM
  #28  
1989GTA's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 11
Default

I think in your situation with a 4.8L motor and a extended cab truck that cam will be fine. I also think you made the right decision in keeping the VVT.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 11:52 AM
  #29  
Gus 82's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: North East Ohio
Default

I know its not the most powerful engine out there but the currently installed cam was actually slower I think then stock..... Once I get this in I will be looking for a 4l80 and a t70....
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 03:35 PM
  #30  
-TheBandit-'s Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 86
From: Instagram @chevyhotrodder
Default

Originally Posted by Scoggin Dickey
Advancing and/or retarding a cam isn't a fad or marketing scheme, it's been used effectively for as long as anyone in performance can remember to move the powerband around. The benefit can not be argued. Peak gains in HP an TQ will vary, some will see quite a bit and some will not see as much if any. To me that's irrelevant as IMO that's just a bonus to the most useful advantage of VVT which is broadening the power range.
^^THIS^^

I think the real question is if the gains are worth the additional costs and whether or not the LSx VVT system will prove reliable in performance applications. My biggest concern with the VVT setup I'm pursuing (TSP VVT-2) is how stable the cam valve timing will be and whether or not that will cause problems with valvetrain control. As long as the timing control is good, you could theoreticaly grind any cam profile onto a VVT core and see the benefits of on-the-fly timing adjustment.

Futureuser, you should have Vengence grind your cam profile on a VVT core, do a swap and let us know what the gains are after cam timing optimization I bet you could do it for less money than I'm spending to fix my rust pile lol.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 07:27 AM
  #31  
pharmd's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by -TheBandit-
^^THIS^^

I think the real question is if the gains are worth the additional costs and whether or not the LSx VVT system will prove reliable in performance applications. My biggest concern with the VVT setup I'm pursuing (TSP VVT-2) is how stable the cam valve timing will be and whether or not that will cause problems with valvetrain control. As long as the timing control is good, you could theoreticaly grind any cam profile onto a VVT core and see the benefits of on-the-fly timing adjustment.

Futureuser, you should have Vengence grind your cam profile on a VVT core, do a swap and let us know what the gains are after cam timing optimization I bet you could do it for less money than I'm spending to fix my rust pile lol.
As a side note, I spoke with my tuner. He has tuned thousands of cars, several with VVT. In his experience he had not seen any "SIGNIFICANT" power or torque increases with VVT cams vs regular cams. Like The Bandit is saying, put a conventional cam in a car, tune it for max power, then swap to a VVT cam, tune it for max power...same dyno, heads, compression, exhaust etc this is the only way to see "IF" their is significant power to be had. picking up 3-5 HP here or there isn't SIGNIFICANT, IMHO doesn't justify the expense or risk. I realize VVT failure leading motor damage is largely a myth at this point, but more moving parts = less reliability...I think most would agree with that. Im not bashing VVT, I just know for me, on my car, in my application, it did NOTHING, and cost me more money. And I would have to imagine I am one of the few non-shop, average consumer type people that have done back to back testing of VVT vs conventional cams, especially that are on a board posting unbiased results. Just trying to share information and help folks be more informed.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 01:01 PM
  #32  
1989GTA's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 11
Default

"several with VVT"

Did these cars have the VVT software tables installed from companies such as TSP who have spent countless hours and hundreds of dyno pulls refining the VVT software for their cams? Were they just using the factory tables?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 02:27 PM
  #33  
Gus 82's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: North East Ohio
Default

I know its not true for every application but I am not trying to get every last bit of HP from my cam install. It actually cost me the same money to do the VVT cam a new solonoid bolt and timing gasket set as it would of to buy all the conversion parts brand new. With the cam being able to advance a bit in the low end I think that should really help MY 4.8 on the bottom end when getting my 22ft Hurricane deck boat up to highway speeds.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE