Doubt about current rocker setup
Last year I started a supercharger project on my 2005 Corvette LS2. It turned into a heads/cam/supercharger project after it got way out of hand. My biggest concern throughout the project has been longevity since I now have (what I consider) so much money into this! The specs of the cam are 223/235@.050, with an advertised duration of 274/285, and a .625/.625 lift. I was concerned about the LS2 lifters, so I installed a set of Morel 5206 linked bar lifters. When I pulled the heads I was concerned about exhaust valves being too small for the supercharger, so I took the 243 heads had them lightly ported and had Manley Elite Series Racing valves on the exhaust side, and had the intake valves lapped. Before I put the car away for the winter I installed the heads, stock rocker arms with trunion upgrade, and buttoned it all up. The car has not been started.
I didn't do anything special other than a trunion upgrade. I didn't shim the rockers, nor did I check the wipe pattern on the valves. I began reading over the winter that although you can run the stock rockers to .650 lift after about .588 lift they tend cause the bronze valve guides to wear, and the valve tips to wear as well. I am short an arm and a leg due to what the machine shop charged me for the exhaust valves and I sure as hell don't what to have to pull these heads again to replace the guides. What are my options here? And if the general consensus is to stick with the stockers; how do I set these up PROPERLY? As I said before longevity is my main concern.
DG
Valve Spring Specs:
O.D. 1.306"
I.D. .676"
Max lift: .660"
Seat load: 153 lb/in at 1.810"
Open load: 400 at 1.150"
Rate: 379 lb/in
Coil bind: 1.100"
DG
The key to valve tip durability when using stock rockers is to run less than .630" lift, run less than 400 lbs open spring pressure, and use oil with the zinc additives, with the oil possibly being the most important in that list.
My Platinum springs work perfect with stock rockers and in the spintron testing that I was involved in worked best of all the springs we tested, even springs that had more open pressure. http://www.briantooleyracing.com/660...l-springs.html
I hope this helps!
The key to valve tip durability when using stock rockers is to run less than .630" lift, run less than 400 lbs open spring pressure, and use oil with the zinc additives, with the oil possibly being the most important in that list.
My Platinum springs work perfect with stock rockers and in the spintron testing that I was involved in worked best of all the springs we tested, even springs that had more open pressure. http://www.briantooleyracing.com/660...l-springs.html
I hope this helps!
Assuming that my measurements have changed since stock (and they have), with the morel 5206 lifters, the and they aftermarket exhaust valves I am running a set of Lunati 7.325 pushrods. The only thing I did was torque these rockers down to 22ft/lbs and called it a day. Is their anything in particular I need to do to set these rockers up properly so I do not expedite the inevitable valve tip wear?
P.S going to be running Joe Gibbs LS30 motor oil
DG
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
A stock rocker rides on the valve tip just like a rocking chair rocks on the floor. It starts on the intake side of the valve tip and rocks all the way to the exhaust side.
Stock rockers are designed to work in a "half arc" meaning that if you visualize the motion of the rocker tip, it works in the first half of an arc. As lift increases past .600" lift the rocker tip starts arcing back towards the intake side of the valve. For roller rockers this is very desirable, it makes the contact patch more narrow. But for stock rockers it's a disaster because the rocker simply spends more of it's cycle dragging across the valve tip. So shimming up roller rockers makes sense. Shimming up stock rockers is one of the worst things you can do for durability.
Pushrod length on a bolt down LS head has zero effect on rocker geometry.
I hope this helps.
Aside from Jessel are there any aftermarket roller rockers actually worth running?
Brian, I have read many of your posts and have based most of the work I have done so far off of them. Its great that you were able to post in this thread. They only thing I can't seem to wrap my mind around is how the rocker movement on the valve tips just sounds so destructive, yet everyone continues to agree the stock rockers are the best. Doesn't make much sense.
I know I am beating a dead horse with this one, however I have one last question. In addition to your threads, I have been reading a lot of threads that vettenuts has posted. My last question; if shimming the rockers is bad because it creates more wear, then what is the point of even checking the wipe pattern if you shouldn't adjust it anyway. My previous questions were all based off the posts vettenuts has made in regard to checking wipe pattern and trying to get the stock rocker arms to have a centered wipe pattern. Well if you shouldn't shim them, then how do you achieve this?
Sorry for all the questions, but I am really interested in making sure I have all my bases covered. I am also the type of person who wants to understand everything I am doing and the reasons why. I do appreciate your patience and education on this subject.
As I mentioned before I will be using Joe Gibbs LS30 motor oil so I shouldn't have to add ZDDP.
Thanks guys,
DG
Last edited by Danspeed1; Jan 21, 2013 at 03:31 PM.

As for rockers? I've seen SOOOO many threads/posts with failed aftermarket roller rockers I'd take advice from Tooley and a handful of others if there is an aftermarket rocker worth running but thats it. Plus Ive only seen a handful of issues with stockers and more importantly my experience with them has been great. I put on lots of miles too and they are not kind miles. ( stock trunions here )
I dont run donkey cams though which prevents the need for them and makes life a lot easier on the rest of the engine. I almost took the bait last time round and went BIG STICK but thankfully I was talked out of it by PatG
As for LPE stands? Hmmm.... milder cams I dont see the need, big cams put a hella lot of load on the little rocker arm bolt with those massive springs so adding beef there is WISE me thinks. LPE has a great rep too
Cams.... tricky business, rife with compromise at every angle, er degree
That's my $0.02, hope it helps,
Now back to my question......................................
DG
On install put a dab of decent non fiber grease on the valve stem tips and on the rocker tip and a dab of red locktite under the rocker arm bolt heads ( clean em with brake clean first ) then install them. If your heads have been ported into the threads of the rocker arm bolts coat them with Locktite #2br
Thats still a pretty big cam imo so Id run it this summer and check it over the winter by pulling the valve covers and a few rocker arms and checking things out for safety.
Hope this is of some help. Thanks for the oil advice.
Just for reference... The stock 243 heads where pulled, and they were milled and ported. New exhaust valves were installed (Manley Elite series race valves). and a complete valve job was done. New Morel linked bar lifters were installed, new push rods, new springs, retainers, locks, basically new everything... so yea the geometry is nowhere near stock.
DG
Like i said, the wipe pattern was OK (before/after?) the trunion upgrade. Either way seems as though there is nothing I can do about it anyway, so why recheck it.
In my posts above I was just interested in the differences in opinion on the importance of wipe pattern as I have seen a couple of other active forum members who advocate checking the pattern and then shimming. After Brian's post though i see why this is a poor idea.
DG
If you have a minute take a look at my thread on CF... you can access it through the link in my signature. It outlines everything I have done.
DG

