Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

PAC 1519 or Manley 221438?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2013 | 09:49 PM
  #1  
Mark200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default PAC 1519 or Manley 221438?

As the title says: PAC 1519 or Manley 221438?

The specs are pretty much the same (at least for my application), use will be with a .590 lift cam and 7100 RPM redline (stock LS7) street car only (may seem some very limited road course use).

Of course the PAC is nitrided, and I don't know what the Manley "super finish" is (only that it costs more). Could be nitriding? Would prefer the longest lasting spring of the two.
Old 05-21-2013 | 09:53 PM
  #2  
low2001gmc's Avatar
MASS seller approved
15 Year Member
iTrader: (148)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 136
From: ELSA, South TEXAS (956) 802-7700
Default

pacs or even consider the psi ml1511s....
Old 05-21-2013 | 10:27 PM
  #3  
litle88's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 4
From: Burbank, Illinois
Default

Have you also considered BTR platinum springs? They have had a "0" failure rate. Just my .2 bud I know they weren't in your list.
Old 05-22-2013 | 07:53 AM
  #4  
outkast6991's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
From: lancaster,pa
Default

I'm running 1519's with .650 lift. Springs were pulled at 3,000 miles and lost no pressure or rate. It seems the key to making a beehive work is a light valve train
Old 05-22-2013 | 03:28 PM
  #5  
Mark200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the input, guys. The PSI 1511's aren't going to give me the balance in pressures I'm looking for (seat/open) and all I should need for a 74 gram valve is a beehive (altho Brian has an excellent price on his spring packages).

I am indeed trying to keep the valvetrain light as possible; I'm planning to use a heavier than stock rocker but am saving weight elsewhere to offset it. Regardless, I'm shooting for seat and open pressures about 20 lbs over stock just for a bit of margin (115/316 on the stock spring at the default install height w/.600 lift).

Looks like the nod is going to go to the PAC's. I couldn't find a weight on the Manley springs so I called them up. The guy on the phone didn't know either, but he promptly got one out of stock and weighed it -- 73 grams. How's that for customer service . . . . unfortunately he didn't know what the Manley 'super finish' was, so that remains a mystery. Considering that, and the weight, the 67 gram PAC's seem to be the more desirable of the two for my particular situation.
Old 05-22-2013 | 03:54 PM
  #6  
outkast6991's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
From: lancaster,pa
Default

Be careful with a heavier rocker. Weight over the nose isn't good for control
Old 05-22-2013 | 04:24 PM
  #7  
TurboBuick6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 678
Likes: 96
Default

Like Outcast said, what rockers are you running? If your going with a roller design, you will need duals.
Old 05-22-2013 | 05:39 PM
  #8  
Mark200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

Mentioned in another thread, the YT 6670 Yella Terra's for the LS7. See https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...la-terras.html

Best I can determine (without handling in person) the nose weight of those are about 12 grams over stock. I can save 5 grams by going to a titanium retainer, and it seems that I can save about 8 grams by going to a lighter spring (some debate on the issue of spring weight importance/impact). So, in my book 12 - 5 - 8 = wash.

That, plus a bit more pressure on the seat and open (over stock) should keep things happy. I think . . . . .

Edit: Unless, the length of the axis of rotation of the rocker nose (1+") gives it a much larger moment of inertia compared to the spring and retainer just moving 0.60" up and down. Hmmmm

Last edited by Mark200; 05-22-2013 at 06:04 PM.



Quick Reply: PAC 1519 or Manley 221438?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.