5.3 ls parts
That being said, on a stock 5.3L with 706 or 862 heads they run a smaller 1.89 intake valve Vs. the 2.0 intake valve on the 243/799 heads. With the bore size of 3.780 on the 4.8/5.3 Block, the intake valve is near the cylinder bore. Especially with a 2 inch valve. When the valve is to close the bore the air tends to stall.
IMO, I believe that's 1 of the reasons why you don't see a benefit steeping up to the TBSS intake and 90mm TB.
Later 5.3s came with the bigger valve and better flowing 243 and 799 heads, and nnbs intake, same as tbss, with electronic 87mm tbs...
so 5.3s can work well with with the better flowing heads and intake...
Important, however, to note, is that 862 and 706 heads came with 61ccs...and...243 and 799 heads came with 65ccs.
So if you have an older 5.3 and swap to 243 or 799 heads and nnbs intake, you will have better flowing heads and intake...but...offset and lose power because with 65 ccs, you will lose compression.
So if you want to optimize swap, youll need to mill 243 or 799 heads .030 to lower ccs from 65 to 59 and slightly improve compression improving power in conjunction with nnbs intake.
That is the key right there. Some folks look at the better flow of the head swap without regard to fact theyre losing compression and power, and have a mismatched combo.
you didn't say what year truck your working with. the 243/799 should
be milled .030 to bring up the comp.or use the 4.8 pistons. a good
cam will really wake up that 5.3 LT headers are a must for power
-243s,
-7.4'' hardened Push rods
-Comp cams 227*/234* - .613/.576 @ 110*
-Edelbrock perfromer dual plane
-MSD box for ignition
-DOD delete,,,,,
-built 4L60 (need 3400-3600 stall)
hoping for 400hp? more?? we will see. Maybe i should mill the heads?





