LS2 Build Questions ???
I have an LS2 out of an 08 Trailblazer SS. It got tore down and stripped with 100k on the clock. The block did not have a failure AT ALL. Everything looked fantastic so as long as the crank and cam spec out the goal is to reuse the cam and crank. With that being said here's the hopeful parts list...
Questions for the build are
1.With the stock crank being reused and no engine failure, the heads and block shouldnt need to be decked all that much, im wondering what Piston and Rod choices are going to last(for as long as possible realistically) under High RPM use?
2. How will decking resurfacing the heads determine my pushrod choice?
Bottom End
-Used Stock LS2 crank
-Used Stock Camshaft
-Looking at TSP Conn Rod and Piston Packages?
-Looking at Cam, Crank and Rod Bearings through TSP along with ALL ARP hardware
Cylinder Head/Top End
-TSP Chromemoly Push Rods
-Cloyes Timing Chain
-PRC Spring Kit (Comes with Springs, Guides, Retainers, Keepers, and Seals
-Havent looked at Valves yet
I would also like to add that Im new here so Hi Everyone!
Last edited by LSmitty2; Jun 13, 2015 at 08:52 PM.
1) For something that will live at higher RPM, a lightweight rotating assembly is a good idea. Manley has some really lightweight I beam rods in the 580-590g range. Probe makes a nice budget piston that is pretty light and has a 1.5/1.5/3.0mm ring pack. Our sponsors should be able to get you set up some nice components and maybe even make a few suggestions based on their experiences.
2) Decking the block and heads could change your pushrod length, depending on how much preload you need. There are several variables that come into play, so it's usually easier just to get the engine together and then use an adjustable pushrod to see what length works.
Here's what I would do;
Replace the rod and crank bearings leave the cam bearings along new Melling high pressure and high volume oil pump brand new single row timing chain set, get a set of ls3 intake and heads preferably the 821 castings mill heads .040 get a cam and matching set of valve spring kit slap that together and head for the dyno, you'll be glad you did.
Here is why I would do this, the bottom end is plenty strong for what you want to do so instead a spending the money there put the money in the top half and just refresh the bottom.
Will cost you about the same and will end up with an easy 450 to the wheels and sounds like an orchestra.
Decking the block/Heads It most likely won't change pushrod length, in theory if you take .010 off the heads .010 off the block it would shorten the effective pushrod length by .020". However it would just add .020" extra preload on the lifter which should be fine. The base circle on a comp cam is typically .025 less than stock, if you upgraded the cam most likely the pushrod length would stay the same because of the decked/block heads. Sorry for rambling but that's how it works out.
Camshaft, upgrade the cam, even an LS7 cam would be decent upgrade, or a comp 220 somthing cam, there's plenty used cams available. Install PAC 1218 beehive springs (or new yellow GM springs) and new LS7 lifters, install new valve seals. Grind the valve seats... Or just lap them atleast.
Anyway point is there's no reason cost wise to not upgrade the camshaft or do some minor upgrades while its apart.
If you change the pistons/rods you will need to balance the crankshaft.
Bearings:
main 2199P
rod 663P
Cam bearings leave them alone unless they're bad. I generally like coated bearings, you can get the above from Calico coated.
Last edited by Fraser588; Jun 17, 2015 at 03:08 PM.
I would deck the block and heads and look at a .040" head gasket for some added compression. Since it is going to be living in the upper RPMs, perhaps look at ditching the stock intake for Vic Jr. single plane.
When you deck the block you need to take off enough material you don't chatter the cutting head. Typically .005-.007 each pass, just to skim a block you typically take off .010" each side. The pistons are already above the deck .006". Unless you cut the piston tops down (which is very easy to do) , you end up with the piston out .016" +/- ; the factory .052" gasket would be best option, .040" gasket is tight then take off the .016" you're at .024" quench , with a forged piston rocking seen them touch the heads with that tight of quench (not bad but too tight.)
Trending Topics
That isn't to say that a .052" GM gasket is a bad choice, either. It all boils down to the math.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Im confuzzled here gentlemen
What i gather from this is both the top and bottom end are able to handle the power and last in the high RPMs. So bolt ons and a tune and im there?
Its seems more cost affective to upgrade the cam vs the bottom end especially if the bottom can handle 475-500 at the crank.
Drifting is a whole different ballgame for the shortblock versus 1/4 or 1/8 mile racing, as I'm sure you're aware.
Before I go spending a couple grand in the top end, I would want a nice bottom end that I know isn't going to puke its guts out after a couple laps and potentially ruin the entire engine.
You're right that a new rotating assembly would require rebalancing the crank, but with the right components, the machinist will be taking weight out of the crank. The bobweights will be reduced and lessen the loads the critical components, like the rod bolts and wrist pins, will have to endure constantly.
As the saying goes, there's more than one way to skin a cat. I'm not saying the stock components won't work, but I would be uncomfortable using them and the risk is not worth the reward.
While some SBEs have done the former, I would not for a second trust them to do the latter. Doing it right the first time will cost less in the long run with that kind of power.
Its seems more cost affective to upgrade the cam vs the bottom end especially if the bottom can handle 475-500 at the crank.
Camshaft wise a better cam for drifting would be 224/230 XER lobes 112+2 (based on minimal info)
Far as the bottom end, adding ARP rod bolts would be a good idea, have the rods honed.
Oiling is an issue for drifing and TBSS pan is bad, I would change to a better oil pan. RMR GTO did well in drifting they used Accusump.
See article:
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...rifter-feature
Last edited by Fraser588; Jun 24, 2015 at 11:45 AM.
Point is, if 800rwhp is ok, less than 500 should be fine. LS2's are sometimes daily driven with 500rwhp.
I talked to Rhys Millen long time ago, if I recall they had SBE with 243 heads.
Article on the GTO Drift car can be seen above.
LS2 factory rods are stout, and LS2 factory pistons generally don't break unless its lean or detonated.
Point is, if 800rwhp is ok, less than 500 should be fine. LS2's are sometimes daily driven with 500rwhp.
I talked to Rhys Millen long time ago, if I recall they had SBE with 243 heads.
Article on the GTO Drift car can be seen above.
LS2 factory rods are stout, and LS2 factory pistons generally don't break unless its lean or detonated.
We doubt any production car was developed with drifting in mind, and it's likely that many would meet the same ruination eventually. So don't try this at home with Dad's new GTO. With that in mind, Millen increased the volume of the oil pan and added an Accusump pressure accumulator. The oil capacity was increased by three quarts to about eight, and the Accusump maintains oil pressure during the slides.
I've looked into an accusump oil pump which is probably what im going with. Ive read great things about their pumps.
Im not taking what you guys say as biblical truth but being as this is my first LS build your responses to weigh kinda heavy on my descions. Thats why im coming here lol.
The back and forth is a little confusing but thats why i thought bottom end now since the cam was easier to swap after the motor had been put back together. The sustained high RPM use was why i thought of going that route now and cam later. But anyone that has used stock bits for long periods of time can chime in. Im listening
haha 







