Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

It's Christmas for me?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2015, 01:05 PM
  #61  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Jake..... I know I already mention that I have a notebook full of nasty all motor builds.
I want to tell you where my research/recording and development have led me too.

-All the cars that run 10s
- All over 402 ci
- All have different race weights acourse
- All run pump gas
- All are 6 speed cars
- All running a hydraulic roller cam
- All running a fast type intake
- All are F bodies
- none of the cars are just fully gutted.
- the cars that trap over 130 plus mph is all running a LS7 head or a TFS 235/245 cathedral head.
- The LS3 heads to be stuck below the 128 mph mark no matter the cubes, cam specs, weight of the car or whoever ported the head.
-All AFR heads seem to be 127-130 mph MAX no matter the cubes, cam specs etc....
- The LS7 heads to trap really high at 135 on a couple combinations but have the same e.t or slower trap time than a TFS cathedral head.
- I only have one combo in my notebook using a MAST cathedral head and it traps 128 mph (413ci).

#now I do however have other combos in my notebook from real world results but they running a single plane type intake, race gas, or a fully gutted lexan glass car. Hope this info is useful cause I like helping anyone that's willing to help me cause after I'm not perfect.

Last edited by Tuskyz28; 12-07-2015 at 01:21 PM.
Old 12-07-2015, 01:37 PM
  #62  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 64 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
Jake..... I know I already mention that I have a notebook full of nasty all motor builds............................................ ..............The LS3 heads to be stuck below the 128 mph mark no matter the cubes, cam specs, weight of the car or whoever ported the head.
-All AFR heads seem to be 127-130 mph MAX no matter the cubes, cam specs etc....
#now I do however have other combos in my notebook from real world results but they running a single plane type intake
I thought maybe you were the worst note taker ever until I saw this disclaimer at the end. LOL Heck there are several 6 liter builds that I know of with 6 liter engines and LS3 heads that top 130. But, they have those dreaded single planes and carburetors on them.
Old 12-07-2015, 01:52 PM
  #63  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
I thought maybe you were the worst note taker ever until I saw this disclaimer at the end. LOL Heck there are several 6 liter builds that I know of with 6 liter engines and LS3 heads that top 130. But, they have those dreaded single planes and carburetors on them.
LOL!! I only have seen one 6 liter like that in a F body with a 6 speed. It had a single plane intake tho with a cut cowl. It was built by BES racing. *silver camaro owned by Charlie Polly.

Now it's plenty of 6 liter motors with LS3 heads going over 130 plus but all are in fox body mustangs which weighs less than 2900 lbs and even those are running single plane intakes and a lot of stall.
Old 12-09-2015, 03:05 PM
  #64  
Super Hulk Smash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Single Plane... LS3 looks good.

LS7 is still the ultimate head, though. And the TFS 245s are monsters.
Old 12-10-2015, 10:55 AM
  #65  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

The aftermarket LS7 castings sure do look nice I must say. Not sure how much a MAST LS7 heads sell for complete but the Brodix heads are 3200 bucks for bare castings..... which is really steep if you compare those to what you can buy a complete set of TFS 245 heads for.
Old 12-10-2015, 01:32 PM
  #66  
Super Hulk Smash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Only LS7 heads that are really worth looking at are the MAST with the hollow-stem valves or the PRCs with Ti valves. Both in the 3200 range complete.

TFS 245 are more like 2700. Hard to beat since I already have a FAST 102 for Cathedral ports...
Old 12-10-2015, 02:54 PM
  #67  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Jake, do you feel like the intake/exhaust relationship of the head ALONE effects on how the motor runs in the real world vs dyno numbers ?
Old 12-10-2015, 03:58 PM
  #68  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
Only LS7 heads that are really worth looking at are the MAST with the hollow-stem valves or the PRCs with Ti valves. Both in the 3200 range complete.

TFS 245 are more like 2700. Hard to beat since I already have a FAST 102 for Cathedral ports...
What I been saying!
Old 02-22-2021, 02:58 PM
  #69  
On The Tree
iTrader: (34)
 
cbruer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MMorgan9812
Could not agree more!!!
If you want big power then you will have to go sheetmetal intake and have it designed to fit under the hood. If you spend all the $'s on heads and the motor then why shortcut it by using a plastic intake?
Old 02-22-2021, 03:41 PM
  #70  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,747 Likes on 1,304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cbruer
If you want big power then you will have to go sheetmetal intake and have it designed to fit under the hood. If you spend all the $'s on heads and the motor then why shortcut it by using a plastic intake?
The better question is why you're going around and posting threads that are 5 years old or more?
The following 2 users liked this post by ddnspider:
G Atsma (02-22-2021), rkupon1 (02-22-2021)
Old 02-22-2021, 06:59 PM
  #71  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
rkupon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bayville,NJ
Posts: 2,010
Received 751 Likes on 407 Posts

Default

I think he finally remembered his password!
The following users liked this post:
ddnspider (02-22-2021)



Quick Reply: It's Christmas for me?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.