Dyno results for 427 stroker with hydraulic cam 776 hp
#25
Read the build thread. Very happy to see the HR results. My build is similar, but with LSX-LS7 heads, Johnson ST lifters, and 14.5:1 compression on E85. I've gotta ask my machinist about installing larger valves.
My car is a track only car too and I'm not spending the $2k+ for a SR. setup for the same reasons you had.
Looking forward to track times and that 300 shot!
My car is a track only car too and I'm not spending the $2k+ for a SR. setup for the same reasons you had.
Looking forward to track times and that 300 shot!
#29
springs are pac x series spring for a 750 lift rate... as far as preload i have no idea i can find out for you when i get back to the shop in a few days...
#30
finally got the motor done and on the dyno... there was a lot of discussion on the hydraulic vs solid cam on my build thread posted below, and i must say i was very happy with the hyd.. we were able to spin it to 7800 with no drop off or flat line in the hp. we actually had room for more timing but since it was day one we decided to stay where we were. the motor just kept asking for more timing though as you can see in the chart. the graphs shown were not the final runs ( my phone died before the last two runs took place but they are close to the final numbers(with the final two runs being 7800+rpm.. ill post a video later..
BUILD THREAD
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...last-page.html
peak tq also not shown in the numerical graph was 615...
7800 rpm on a hydro is fine with me any day
BUILD THREAD
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...last-page.html
peak tq also not shown in the numerical graph was 615...
7800 rpm on a hydro is fine with me any day
NICE, I thought HR couldn't make this kinda power LolAwesome Job
#35
#37
I went with ls7 lifters because I've found stock Gm stuff especially newer ls stuff is almost always just as good if not better than after market stuff.
#39