How much power
I would contact CamMotion about setting up that engine with a LLSR valve-train.....and would do it BEFORE doing anything to the heads and pistons.
Also, I'd consider a FAST intake with the mid-length, High-HP runners with a solid roller set-up.
KW
I would contact CamMotion about setting up that engine with a LLSR valve-train.....and would do it BEFORE doing anything to the heads and pistons.
Also, I'd consider a FAST intake with the mid-length, High-HP runners with a solid roller set-up.
KW
The FAST only seems to add power from the peak torque to the peak horse range where as the low to mid drivability with the LS3 is just explosive

Getting the LS3 intake ported closes the gap on peak numbers as well
I would keep the VVT, less cost AND install limiters in the VVT motor.
This operation is easy as the kit I supply/others kit includes a spring retaining tool.
I would fit a new IwIs "single" chain, beef-up the LS-92 chain idle spring.
I too agree, the LS-3 intake, and with VVT, it will surprise you in power AND torque.
GM should have done SO with the LS-3.
Lance
I would keep the VVT, less cost AND install limiters in the VVT motor.
This operation is easy as the kit I supply/others kit includes a spring retaining tool.
I would fit a new IwIs "single" chain, beef-up the LS-92 chain idle spring.
I too agree, the LS-3 intake, and with VVT, it will surprise you in power AND torque.
GM should have done SO with the LS-3.
Lance
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I kinda doubt it.....but we'll see.
KW

KW
The FAST only seems to add power from the peak torque to the peak horse range where as the low to mid drivability with the LS3 is just explosive

Getting the LS3 intake ported closes the gap on peak numbers as well
(RWHP went from 402 to 424, dont think the intake helped to much there)
Ive got the before and after dyno sheets if interested in seeing them. Just had it dynoed yesterday. Hope this helps...
Last edited by Choppy; Jan 5, 2017 at 11:54 PM.






