Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Anyone have Texas-Speed Darton sleeved motor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2017, 10:52 AM
  #41  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
I still think it's a "overthought" scenario. Ain't no telling how many sleeved 5.3 motors is out running around with no issues. Hell Tim used one to propel his fox body to low 9s in the quarter and have reported the motor was turned up as high 7800 rpm. His setup was basic dry sleeved 5.3 454ci with rectangular port heads with a hydraulic roller. He drove the car everywhere.
IIRC, Tim had a vacuum pump. That would alleviate the problem.
Old 03-27-2017, 11:11 AM
  #42  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
IIRC, Tim had a vacuum pump. That would alleviate the problem.
My eyes must be playing tricks on me. I looked at Tim thread last night and also looked at SSStang (81 mustang cobra) last night.... neither one had a dry sump setup on the motor. Both cars are identical builds.
Both Fox body cars.
Both was dry sleeved aluminum 5.3 ERL 454ci motors.
Both setups go over 7000 rpm.
Both ran 9s at 140 plus N/A.
Both are square port heads.
Both had Scumann oil pumps and a moroso oil pan.
Old 03-27-2017, 01:22 PM
  #43  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Double06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Potomac, MD
Posts: 625
Received 221 Likes on 153 Posts

Default

I think also the oil pan you run also makes a difference. On the Corvette there is not a lot of room. May not be as much of an issue on the F Body? If GM designed it in 2005 with the LS2/LS7 and then redesigned the LS3 then somebody did some testing in Detroit and changed it. I think on the Dart block they advertise this is not an issue as there is no side part of the block (4 bolt main) and now they use a taller oil pan.
Old 03-27-2017, 02:22 PM
  #44  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oceanside, Ca.
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 142 Likes on 40 Posts

Default Breather hole drilling

The breather hole is an option for better bay to bay breathing on wet sump engines. I have never seen a block crack because of the breather hole.

Steve


Originally Posted by Jontall
I don't like the way RED drills through the block between the cam and crankshaft... Does nothing but weaken the block and I've read that some crack.
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Old 03-27-2017, 02:47 PM
  #45  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Double06
I think also the oil pan you run also makes a difference. On the Corvette there is not a lot of room. May not be as much of an issue on the F Body? If GM designed it in 2005 with the LS2/LS7 and then redesigned the LS3 then somebody did some testing in Detroit and changed it. I think on the Dart block they advertise this is not an issue as there is no side part of the block (4 bolt main) and now they use a taller oil pan.
SSStang runs a moroso F body pan with no issues in his fox body...
Old 03-27-2017, 03:09 PM
  #46  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Thanks for taking at look at our resleeved blocks. To answer a few questions:

1. The sleeves come direct from darton, and are dry sleeves

2. All the sleeving is done in house, no parts is farmed out to any other company.

3. We use Gen IV 5.3 aluminium blocks to do the sleeving, however you can choose to have it done with an LS3 or LS7. We didn't see a real need to offer it using those blocks as there wasn't a decent advantage to using them and the price would increase significantly.

4. We have currently done around 20 resleeved blocks that are up and running and continue to do quite a few every month. These block have been met with outstanding reviews and feedback from our customers and vendors both.

5. We have no doubt these block will hold up to most boost applications as well. The sleeves can be bored out to 4.185 for the N/A as a maximum and we would recommend around a 4.125 maximum for the boosted applications.

If you have any direct questions give us a call and we can help you out.
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 03-27-2017, 03:40 PM
  #47  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
SSStang runs a moroso F body pan with no issues in his fox body...
What issues are you expecting to happen?
Old 03-27-2017, 03:53 PM
  #48  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

I'd prefer to do in a 5.3L... say you have a 5.3L. That's really a 454 or something.
Old 03-27-2017, 04:45 PM
  #49  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (83)
 
Gray86hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Battle Creek Mi
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I didnt go any quicker with the pump. 9.24 was with no pump. Went 9.28 with the pump in better air with a touch less gear in it. The correct gear would have gone a .18 or .19 with the pump. Also the car was wheeling 120' on the .24 pass
Old 03-27-2017, 05:04 PM
  #50  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gray86hatch
I didnt go any quicker with the pump. 9.24 was with no pump. Went 9.28 with the pump in better air with a touch less gear in it. The correct gear would have gone a .18 or .19 with the pump. Also the car was wheeling 120' on the .24 pass
You're saying you went 9.28 with the pump, but should have gone 9.18? What were the MPH before and after?
Old 03-27-2017, 06:02 PM
  #51  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (83)
 
Gray86hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Battle Creek Mi
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

9.24 -144. no pump and 4.10. 1300 da

9.28. -145. Pump. 3.90. 600 da.

1/8 speed was almost exactly the same. Two different tracks. Not sure I believe the 145

Same gear with no pump in 600da car would have ran a .19
Old 03-27-2017, 06:04 PM
  #52  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (83)
 
Gray86hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Battle Creek Mi
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Car was .04 slower to the 330 due to the gear.

Last edited by Gray86hatch; 03-27-2017 at 06:22 PM.
Old 03-28-2017, 01:43 PM
  #53  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 3,869
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

L33 5.3 blocks have bay windows. It's basically a 5.3 ls6
Old 03-28-2017, 02:02 PM
  #54  
Launching!
 
TX98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Heres some info I had bookmarked over 6 years ago, Steve @ RED gave some important information in this thread, a lot has to do with re-sleeving an LS1, but very good info though on re-sleeving other blocks (GenIV) also.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ls1-427-a.html



Quick Reply: Anyone have Texas-Speed Darton sleeved motor?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM.