406 lsx vs 408 lsx
I'm really curious to see how 98_ws6_m6's 383 he's building with a mamo top end will compare with Big Hammer's 388. Both of those are very well built motors - not like its a bad 383 and a tremendous 388




Richard Holdener has done also.
Tony's 383" with AFR 225s & solid roller, 242/248, 114 LSA
Made 611 HP on the Westech Dyno @ 6800 starting to roll over @
7200+, 523 lb'
Made 530-540 RWHP in a Very efficient C5.
Hammers 388" 630 RWHP @ ~7200 carrying to 7800+
80+ RWHP from 5" & +40-60 CFM From ~.300"-.700"
and I think Hammer would have liked another 4-6* intake
Duration.
My 396" same Dyno as Tony, 11.7 VS 11.0 Comp
243/249 LLSR , 115+3 .680" VS .650" Lift
Similar cam specs (some would say small & or incorrect)
+40-70CFM from ~.300"-.700"
690 HP @ 7100-7300 RPM, Carrying to 7600+,
VS 611, 543lb' VS 523lb'
Advantage of studying builds for Many Years.
You are correct in that Most here with a Big Bore would use
A 4.00" or at least 3.9" Stroke.
For me it wasn't what I Wanted or Needed, not trying to convince
Anyone differently for 95% of most builds.
My friend 64 Post is building a wicked 416"
With a 4.0" stroke, that will make some
Serious Steam here pretty quick (6-8 weeks)
For a 4 inch stroke I know where a solid roller 250/260/270/280 would place me at in terms of RPM. A given lift and compression. We have a Ball park as there are other builds doing 416 which to reference.
Last edited by Patron; Aug 9, 2017 at 06:15 PM.




With LLSR, High Comp, E85, and Powerglide targeting
620+ RWHP & Easy 9 second times @ 138+.
The EAP model is based on OEM level LS-3 with a Cam Spec of 244/256 .621"/.612" with a 114 C/L (a common spec) AND 24" exhaust primary. (shorties)
WE ALL KNOW different parameters will create big changes.
Your quest is Bore/Stroke performance.
Thus : 408 = 6000 RPM Torque of 589 and 6500 RPM HP of 677.
406 = 6000 RPM Torque of 588 and 6500 RPM HP of 676.
MODE : 408 = 5000 RPM Torque of 575
406 = 5000 RPM Torque of 572
What we know is a 4.00" crankshaft is "shelf"
What we know is a 3.75" crankshaft is custom at 2X cost.
Piston Speed = 408 6500 RPM of 4333
Piston Speed = 406 6500 RPM of 4063
What "new" specs Patron ?
Lance
Last edited by pantera_efi; Aug 9, 2017 at 06:24 PM. Reason: Fosters
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I do see that the 383 made more power than the 346 with the same basic configuration, so I see where the stroke did add power and torque vs the 346.
But, Also, that motor made less at the crank than Big Hammer did at the rear tires in his 388. That's why I'm so interested to see 98's results. Even so, Hammer's got a bigger cam and solid vs hydraulic.
I love threads like this.
Last edited by Patron; Aug 9, 2017 at 08:30 PM.




I'm really curious to see how 98_ws6_m6's 383 he's building with a mamo top end will compare with Big Hammer's 388. Both of those are very well built motors - not like its a bad 383 and a tremendous 388
Airflow CFM Delta between MAST LS3 Heads &
MMS 220s, followed by the Intake Runner Length
Difference between FAST Mid Length & FAST
Long Cat Runners or Even MSD Cats, which are
Still longer then the Mid Lengths.
http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/sh....php?t=1156026
Last edited by Patron; Aug 9, 2017 at 08:56 PM.
The Camshaft, Intake ???
You Specify, it would then be simple.
You, Patron use your brain, THUS NOT A BLACK "00" *** !
Lance
Darn good topic took most of my evening..... let me see the last parts of this preseason NFL game. Had fun. I'll be bac.
Last edited by Patron; Aug 9, 2017 at 09:17 PM.
I'm waiting for Lance. We seen 6000 rpm and it's the same for more $. Let us now see what happens with RPM. Big bore heads flow 400 and small bores flow around 360 to 390 depending on CSA and heads used.
Last edited by Patron; Aug 9, 2017 at 10:27 PM.




