Camshaft Performance differences
416 CI, 6.2 block with TFS LS7 heads, 60 degree IVC cam, and compression under 13, (which could mean 12.99765), and a CID intake, scattered over four posts. You haven't told me what the builder or owner is trying to accomplish, what vehicle it's going in, what transmission, or even the other three valve events of the cam, or if it's solid vs hydraulic. So I don't know how to answer the question, beyond what I've said. On the surface it looks like a mismatch, but I don't feel like I have enough information to make any kind of reasoned opinion. And you haven't just linked me to the article, so it sort of feels like a trap is being set.
I feel like there's more here than what you're telling me.
The generalities would be high compression, high rpm, a solid roller that will actually be 57 after lash, or boost, or some combination of all of the above. Those are the generalities without a more complete picture.
416 CI, 6.2 block with TFS LS7 heads, 60 degree IVC cam, and compression under 13, (which could mean 12.99765), and a CID intake, scattered over four posts. You haven't told me what the builder or owner is trying to accomplish, what vehicle it's going in, what transmission, or even the other three valve events of the cam, or if it's solid vs hydraulic. So I don't know how to answer the question, beyond what I've said. On the surface it looks like a mismatch, but I don't feel like I have enough information to make any kind of reasoned opinion. And you haven't just linked me to the article, so it sort of feels like a trap is being set.
I feel like there's more here than what you're telling me.
The generalities would be high compression, high rpm, a solid roller that will actually be 57 after lash, or boost, or some combination of all of the above. Those are the generalities without a more complete picture.






