LS7 and 11,000 RPM's
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 1,958
From: Conroe, Texas
The following 2 users liked this post by 01CamaroSSTx:
G Atsma (11-28-2019), NAVYBLUE210 (11-28-2019)
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (11-28-2019)
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (11-28-2019)
#4
She was a SCREAMER! Gearhead music at its finest!
He mentioned it was 358 cid. So obviously a short stroke LS7. I am EXTREMELY curious as to the valvetrain components used.
Let's hope/pray this knowledge trickles down to the gearhead masses
BTW, EFI University has GOT to be one cool place to work!
Let's hope/pray this knowledge trickles down to the gearhead masses
BTW, EFI University has GOT to be one cool place to work!
Last edited by G Atsma; 11-28-2019 at 11:32 AM.
The following users liked this post:
01CamaroSSTx (11-28-2019)
#6
She was a SCREAMER! Gearhead music at its finest!
He mentioned it was 358 cid. So obviously a short stroke LS7. I am EXTREMELY curious as to the valvetrain components used.
Let's hope/pray this knowledge trickles down to the gearhead masses
BTW, EFI University has GOT to be one cool place to work!
He mentioned it was 358 cid. So obviously a short stroke LS7. I am EXTREMELY curious as to the valvetrain components used.
Let's hope/pray this knowledge trickles down to the gearhead masses
BTW, EFI University has GOT to be one cool place to work!
https://www.dragzine.com/tech-storie...s-race-engine/
#7
She was a SCREAMER! Gearhead music at its finest!
He mentioned it was 358 cid. So obviously a short stroke LS7. I am EXTREMELY curious as to the valvetrain components used.
Let's hope/pray this knowledge trickles down to the gearhead masses
BTW, EFI University has GOT to be one cool place to work!
He mentioned it was 358 cid. So obviously a short stroke LS7. I am EXTREMELY curious as to the valvetrain components used.
Let's hope/pray this knowledge trickles down to the gearhead masses
BTW, EFI University has GOT to be one cool place to work!
The Jesel rocker ratio is 1.9:1 and leverages against a PSI valvespring with 410 pounds on the seat and 1,200 pounds open. If you multiply 1,200 pounds times a rocker ratio of 1.9:1, the pushrod is working against almost 2,300 pounds of load.
Valvesprings lost control at 11,300, which is why the rpm is “limited” to 11,230ish. Springs are changed after every pull. I’ve heard Billy is working with PSI, who made the springs, in development of a better spring to shoot for more rpm.
Shaft rockers of course, I believe Jesel Mohawk units.
EDIT...Kent treed me...
Trending Topics
#8
Che70velle, thank you so much for laying all that out! Just shows what a truly focused build involves.
I never would have believed how specialized some of those pieces are. Springs lasting ONE PULL!
Hearing that engine pull to over 11k RPM was pure mechanical symphonic music!
I never would have believed how specialized some of those pieces are. Springs lasting ONE PULL!
Hearing that engine pull to over 11k RPM was pure mechanical symphonic music!
#9
On a similar note, nascar cup engines of today utilize non-adjustable rocker arms...what!!! They set lash with pushrod length and lash caps. The adjustment cup mechanism has been removed in the name of reliability and weight, even on the pushrod side of the rocker fulcrum. Yes, solid roller camshafts. Most shops are using T&D stainless rockers. Fewer moving parts means more reliability.
And some guys here though Darth was crazy when he set his valvetrain up...shame shame.
And some guys here though Darth was crazy when he set his valvetrain up...shame shame.
The following users liked this post:
NAVYBLUE210 (11-28-2019)
#10
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 234
From: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
On a similar note, nascar cup engines of today utilize non-adjustable rocker arms...what!!! They set lash with pushrod length and lash caps. The adjustment cup mechanism has been removed in the name of reliability and weight, even on the pushrod side of the rocker fulcrum. Yes, solid roller camshafts. Most shops are using T&D stainless rockers. Fewer moving parts means more reliability.
And some guys here though Darth was crazy when he set his valvetrain up...shame shame.
And some guys here though Darth was crazy when he set his valvetrain up...shame shame.
#11
Thunderstruck was the first that I saw, but it was so long ago I’m not sure most here would know. He doesn’t come around much. He posted recently and it was a surprise to many of us.
#12
Originally Posted by Che70velle
On a similar note, nascar cup engines of today utilize non-adjustable rocker arms...what!!! They set lash with pushrod length and lash caps. The adjustment cup mechanism has been removed in the name of reliability and weight, even on the pushrod side of the rocker fulcrum. Yes, solid roller camshafts. Most shops are using T&D stainless rockers. Fewer moving parts means more reliability.
And some guys here though Darth was crazy when he set his valvetrain up...shame shame.
And some guys here though Darth was crazy when he set his valvetrain up...shame shame.
My guess is 4.8 crank and bored out to approx 4.175
#13
Originally Posted by NAVYBLUE210
Agreed, although I believe Thunderstruck did it first here on tech with prompting and advice from Kip @ CamMotion.
#17
#18