Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Cam recommendation to limit torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2020, 10:34 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
sti410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cam recommendation to limit torque

I am using an L33 in a swap in front of a relatively weak transmission. I would like to limit torque to 650 ft*lbs but still make 1000hp, so I am looking for a cam and that will flow well out to 8k+ in a turbo application. Can this be done with stock 799 heads and an LS4 intake manifold? I am going to start with stock internals, so ideally the cam will work with OEM flat top pistons without valve interference.
Old 07-14-2020, 12:33 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
old motorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SE TEXAS
Posts: 1,485
Received 188 Likes on 113 Posts

Default

You probably need to upgrade your transmission. Don't believe 1000/650 is doable. You could limit boost until you get a beefier transmission, but that would limit both hp and tq.
Old 07-14-2020, 12:48 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,128
Received 3,110 Likes on 2,425 Posts
Default

Horsepower is a calculation of torque vs RPM.
Lower the torque, HP goes down, unless you rev it a lot higher.
No cam will cut torque and keep the same HP.
The following users liked this post:
KW Baraka (07-17-2020)
Old 07-14-2020, 01:36 PM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes on 1,146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sti410
I am using an L33 in a swap in front of a relatively weak transmission. I would like to limit torque to 650 ft*lbs but still make 1000hp, so I am looking for a cam and that will flow well out to 8k+ in a turbo application. Can this be done with stock 799 heads and an LS4 intake manifold? I am going to start with stock internals, so ideally the cam will work with OEM flat top pistons without valve interference.
What you're asking is mathematically possible, but is going to require a better cam expert than you will find on here, unless PatG decides to chime in, in which case, he's on here. If you peak AT 8000 rpm, your torque would need to be 656. I'm sure you already did some of this math prior to posting. A lot is going to depend not on the cam, but rather on how your turbo(s) is(are) setup. And valvetrain stability. That'll be the real key. you'll need more focus on the valvetrain stability than the cam specs themselves.

You'll need one helluva valvetrain set up. I highly recommend solids, top shelf springs, and top shelf rockers. my recommendation assuming a solid cam would be along the lines of 238/256-116-2 (that's minus two, i.e. retarded cam). That cam will support the RPM and should not build too much torque. Back of the napkin math, and I know there are pros out there who will either do a better job in general or outright laugh at that spec.

The rest will depend on how well your turbo(s) spool, etc.

Personally, i think it will be easier to get a beefier transmission, but to each their own.
Old 07-14-2020, 01:46 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
sti410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cool, ok thanks. What is generally the rpm limit for a hydraulic lifter setup? The tranny is very expensive to upgrade so I am hoping to work around it.

Last edited by sti410; 07-14-2020 at 01:53 PM.
Old 07-14-2020, 02:02 PM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes on 1,146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sti410
Cool, ok thanks. What is generally the rpm limit for a hydraulic lifter setup? The tranny is very expensive to upgrade so I am hoping to work around it.
You can take hydraulics quite fast given the right lifters. Johnson 2126ST for example, I would not hesitate to take to 8k. valvetrain stability is still the biggest issue. The higher rpm goes, the more critical it gets.

But getting to the other parts -- LS4 intake stinks. stock 799 heads, i mean, at least do a premim vlave job. And you'll need premium valves to spin that fast. And then there's all the nuance details of building to spin 8K on a regular basis. My point is that I do recognize how expensive a transmission build is. But you might be surprised after pricing everything out, it's cheaper than setting yourself up for 8000 rpm. You take those johnson lifters, custom pushrods, high end rockers, high end springs, valve job to go with that. You'd be amazed where you are after pricing that out.

Do what you want. I'm just trying to make sure you know how deep the rabbithole goes...
Old 07-17-2020, 05:05 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 524 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

What about limiting boost below 5500 or so? Is there a boost contoller that will ramp in boost with rpm? Or put a turbo on it so damn big it wont spool under 6k lol

Or maybe a procharger.. they're so linear they bring in power soft ish



Quick Reply: Cam recommendation to limit torque



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.