Need some expertise analysis on cause of failed rotating assembly
Lubrication seemed to be sufficient (is an aftermarket dry sump). All journals except the 1-2 rod journals look great, as do the bearings. At this point I am posting some photos where I need some expertise to determine what damage I am looking at. The #1 rod crank journal has some odd coloring. On one side of the journal, no coloration, but on the opposite side of the same journal, it is nearly black, so I would like to have some thoughts on what/why that is. Secondly, a closeup of the #2 rod bearings is confusing to me. This bearing was still housed within the #2 rod. The #1 rod bearing (this was the rod that was completely destroyed) was wadded up in a ball, but did not have any of this scaling on the bearing material). Obviously, there is a lot of damage, but I cannot determine what caused this odd look of the bearing. Was it due to the immediate loss of oil pressure due to the adjacent rod leaving the journal at high RPM, or was this something else causing this (did low oil pressure cause the failure of the bearing, then rod, etc?). On one hand it appears to be a bearing failure of some sort, spalled somewhat, but more like it was ablated rather than spun off.
So…was this a failure of the bearing first, and if so why (am running a Dailey Engineering dry sump, and all other bearings are perfect), or was this a failure of the rod, or rod bolt, and the bearing appearance is a result of the calamity that took place?
Indication that I used SPS rod bolts
All journals looked great except for the failure
Beaten sided of the block inner wall
One side of the journal that had the failure
Opposite side of the same journal
Rod bearings of the #2 rod. #1 rod and bearing were pretty much obliterated.
Closeup of the other photo.
Comparison of number 3 rod bearing.
Last edited by blueovalz; Dec 9, 2023 at 05:03 PM.
Were the big ends of the rods re-sized for the new rod bolts?
that fact that it coincides with a rev limit change leads me to believe it was a rod failure. Typically a big end failure is from over rev. Btdt. Especially in a road course car, they are extra hard on rods from engine breaking/downshifts.
should a upgraded gen iv rod survived here? Probably, but again, don’t know the history. I’ve always suspected cracked cap rods should not be upgraded with hd bolts. Just outside design parameters.
What I think happened here is that at high RPM with a normal piston when the rod under tension it tries to turn 0 shaped instead of round, pinches the main bearing on the sides. This phenomenon is one reason high RPM V8 stuff runs more than the stock bearing clearance. Instantly gets hot as a pistol, and everything fails a fraction of a second later.
Why did the rod go oval? I’m talking about a thousandth here. Rod bearings look worse to me at the parting lines, telling me that contact with the crank occurred there, reinforcing my idea of ovaling. It’s a gen 4 rod, and while it’s a great rod, it’s not rated to do what your doing with it, for the period of time that you’ve been doing this. I feel that the rods were round when assembled and this occurred lately…maybe after you bumped up the limiter. I say this because the build has 5k miles on it. It would have NEVER lasted 5k hard miles if the rods were out of round to begin with.
….edit…Kawboom said same thing while I was typing. Treed me…
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I'm interested to see how out of round the higher clamping force is with upgraded fasteners.
OP, thanks for posting. Kawboom and Che70velle, thanks for the analysis.
I'm interested to see how out of round the higher clamping force is with upgraded fasteners.













