Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Batting around the idea of fuel efficient 87 octane engine for a C6 Vette

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2025 | 08:49 PM
  #1  
Racesloth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 66
Likes: 10
From: Augusta, GA
Default Batting around the idea of fuel efficient 87 octane engine for a C6 Vette

As part of my work, I drive a lot 45-50k miles a year. I have a nice 2010 Taurus Limited with a 3.5 na engine. It is quite comfortable and averages 26-27mpg depending how fast I drive on I95.

I have been thinking about buying a 2007 C6 and building a smaller 5.3 or even 4.8 LS that would be efficient, get better mileage, last 110K miles and run on 87 octane.

Has anyone done this or though about super efficient low compression combinations. Like light weight rods, pistons, valve train etc...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2025 | 10:15 PM
  #2  
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 252
From: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Default

Easy enough to get 27+ mpg with stock M6 C6 @ ~70 mph.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2025 | 10:55 PM
  #3  
Racesloth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 66
Likes: 10
From: Augusta, GA
Default

Understood. I usually drive 80-85. The stock C6 still takes premium right?. I would like to get better mileage through less displacement and higher efficiency while burning cheaper gas not caring about how much hp it makes.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2025 | 12:41 PM
  #4  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,799
Likes: 5,133
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Toyota Prius?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2025 | 03:11 PM
  #5  
LS1 TJ's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 519
Default

A smaller cube engine running 80-85 mph could cause you to use more gas pedal reducing your current MPG. Maybe reduced compression on your 6.0/6.2 so you can run 87 octane?
Have you done the math on the costs of the changes compared to the higher cost of 91 octane?
One more thought. Lower rear gears to reduce the cruising rpm?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2025 | 08:06 PM
  #6  
Racesloth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 66
Likes: 10
From: Augusta, GA
Default

Prius? Thanks but no thanks. I have thought about the costs - I was just batting around the idea...
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2025 | 09:23 PM
  #7  
showdog75's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 246
From: Hixson TN
Default

I think about well put together and thought out combination paying attention to quench etc well make for a efficient engine that can be somewhat octane friendly depending on cam events. Smaller engines work harder to accomplish the same results as bigger engines. Jmo
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2025 | 10:01 AM
  #8  
grinder11's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,207
Likes: 1,611
From: Michigan & Florida
Default

I understand wanting to save money on fuel. But no Corvette has ever been marketed as an economy car. I've had an LS7 in my C5 for almost 20 years. I can get an actual 23mpg on the highway. I guess my point is this; I'd never emasculate my Corvette. I'd never go from even an LS1 to a 4.8 or 5.3. If you are considering a 5.3, I'd build it for boost, a turbo. This is what the OEMs are doing for maximum power AND economy. I believe you'd be very sorry if you go to a 4.8 or 5.3 N/A.....
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2025 | 03:21 PM
  #9  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,799
Likes: 5,133
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Fwiw, the best way to get a gallon of gasoline to go further is to squeeze it harder…compression. It’s why the LT’s have such a high compression ratio…fuel economy. The Gen6 coming soon will have even more, and from what my insiders are telling me, it’s going to be a Coyote engine on steroids. We shall see I suppose.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2025 | 05:17 PM
  #10  
MuhThugga's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 322
From: Wilmington, De
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
Fwiw, the best way to get a gallon of gasoline to go further is to squeeze it harder…compression. It’s why the LT’s have such a high compression ratio…fuel economy. The Gen6 coming soon will have even more, and from what my insiders are telling me, it’s going to be a Coyote engine on steroids. We shall see I suppose.
Does that mean GM is abandoning pushrods all together?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2025 | 07:54 PM
  #11  
DualQuadDave's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 608
Default

You are thinking too hard, getting the mileage out if a Vette is easy. It's all load abd rpm. You can get near 30mpg hwy with a 6.2, proper camming, proper gearing, etc. Building a tiny motor isn't the answer, it's all load based to get mpg.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2025 | 10:18 PM
  #12  
Racesloth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 66
Likes: 10
From: Augusta, GA
Default

Thanks guys.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2025 | 06:42 PM
  #13  
old motorhead's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 243
From: SE TEXAS
Default

I've been building a 30mpg 750 rwhp C6 in my head lately. During the slack times on the farm, the mind wanders a bit

It involves a 4.8L crank in an LS3 block (337 cubic inches?). Also, flex fuel and a TVS blower needs to happen. 12.5:1 static with a 215/236 115 high lift cam. Run it on 93 octane unleaded for the 30mpg and E85 when the 750 at the wheels is called for.

My version of what the OP is looking for.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM.