Compression Ratio for boosted motors
currently I’m building an iron Gen IV 6.0L and am at the part where I get to finalize my build list prior to purchasing parts. Currently I’m debating going with a 10:1 static comp ratio or a 9.5:1.
I understand static comp plays a small role in the overall healthiness of the engine but just looking to get opinions.
The car runs E85 majority of the time (occasionally 93 is needed for a road trip but never raced or pushed on regular pump gas). For fuel it has triple 450walbro set up with injector dynamic 1050x’s (may need upgrade to 1300’s). And I will be putting in a full forged rotating assembly, boost cam, LS9 head gaskets, etc…
For power adders I’ll be running twin 66mm turbos. And am aiming to make a maximum of 1100-1200hp.
With good fueling and tuning higher comp boost motors are much more prevalent than 20 years ago but what would everyone personally choose? 9.5:1 or 10:1?
lower compression will help you keep the heads down at 1200hp though
Half a point isn't going to be noticeable really
Youll need at least the 1300s
.
.
Serious question: WHY?
Once boosted, Manifold pressure is adjustable with the literal turn of a dial, or exchange of wastegate spring.
" Boost pressure is ALWAYS cheaper than machine work "
AIR Pressure is cheaper than pistons.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time










