Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

z07

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2004, 07:45 PM
  #61  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by bad2000ss
Lets hope this means that Chevrolet will be producing a MUCH more inexpensive block casting capable of a 4.125" bore than the currect C5R block.
I read somewhere that the LS7 will use the C5R block. Of course it will have to be modified a little for the external knock sensors and such. The C5R block is expensive because it is not mass produced. It has about the same amount of aluminum as the LS1 lol. It would not take much to have them mass produced IMO. I tend to believe the rumor I read because it would seem to be cost effective for GM. The question is what size crank and rods will be used. Everything I've heard is it will be a 427.
Old 08-17-2004, 08:10 PM
  #62  
14 Second Truck Club
 
Lilbro665's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just heared from my local dealership. 427 for the Z07. He told me the ZO7 name too.
Old 08-18-2004, 07:46 AM
  #63  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Chicago Crew UnderBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL (Chicago Suburb)
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think those expecting or counting on GM using a 7 liter 427 motor for the 2006 Z06 will be greatly disappointed. MY $ is on a 6.4 liter motor (at the most) making 500 ponies (if were lucky) in a 3000 lb car!
Old 08-20-2004, 05:05 AM
  #64  
Teching In
 
phear_this_mind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am going to say this ONE time at the end of the thread:

- 6.4 ltr engine
- 475 HP first year, 500 subsequent
- The Z06 namesake remains, there will be no mass produced "Z07"
- Body modifications will be both functional and aesthetic
- No magnetic ride selection, all major suspension/brake components will be upgraded
- $9,000 over Base C6 manual
Old 08-22-2004, 01:26 PM
  #65  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Full-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate of SC
Posts: 3,069
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

we all have to give GM its props for sticking with the the traditional pushrod v8's and making their power the old fashioned way, albeit there is nothing old fashioned about the LS1

ford couldnt do it even with the 351 they put in the original lightning ... now they have gone to supercharging 4 valve headed motors only to come up shy of the LS6 2 valver

now GM will be making 500 hp with the LS7? all of a sudden the Viper doesnt sound to tough after all with its V10 .... You really need to stop and think whats going on in front of our very eyes ... the muscle car era that peaked in 1970 that we hear so much about, the hp wars, that will never be the same again? They were nothing to what is going on now. 400 - 500HP, 25+mpg, smooth running small blocks? Wow
Old 08-22-2004, 02:06 PM
  #66  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Full-Force
we all have to give GM its props for sticking with the the traditional pushrod v8's and making their power the old fashioned way, albeit there is nothing old fashioned about the LS1

ford couldnt do it even with the 351 they put in the original lightning ... now they have gone to supercharging 4 valve headed motors only to come up shy of the LS6 2 valver

now GM will be making 500 hp with the LS7? all of a sudden the Viper doesnt sound to tough after all with its V10 .... You really need to stop and think whats going on in front of our very eyes ... the muscle car era that peaked in 1970 that we hear so much about, the hp wars, that will never be the same again? They were nothing to what is going on now. 400 - 500HP, 25+mpg, smooth running small blocks? Wow
I doubt Mopar will be at bay with the release of the c6 z06...you see, unlike GM, they have *****...
Old 08-22-2004, 04:09 PM
  #67  
Teching In
 
DRM C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was at Road America Friday and Saturday for the World Challenge/ALMS races. While there, I stopped by the Caddy team transport where they had three entries for the World Challenge GT race. A team manager said that the Cadillac CTS Super-V, if produced, will use the 427 engine. 600 hp for a supposed $65k. In my opinion, it would be sick for Corvette to be trumped by a Caddy.
Old 08-22-2004, 05:21 PM
  #68  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DRM C5
I was at Road America Friday and Saturday for the World Challenge/ALMS races. While there, I stopped by the Caddy team transport where they had three entries for the World Challenge GT race. A team manager said that the Cadillac CTS Super-V, if produced, will use the 427 engine. 600 hp for a supposed $65k. In my opinion, it would be sick for Corvette to be trumped by a Caddy.

remember the days when the caddies had the 500 ci monsters?
Old 08-24-2004, 12:43 AM
  #69  
TECH Resident
 
JamRWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PARIAH
Just heared from my local dealership. 427 for the Z07. He told me the ZO7 name too.

Don't listen to the dealers.....they have no clue 99% of the time.
Old 08-24-2004, 03:17 PM
  #70  
Staging Lane
 
koniu77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Full-Force, ill give some props to GM, when they start making forged bottomends (like the new cobra has) for our cars. Everyone here would love to have a stock car that could handle a 300 NOS shot, or 20psi of boost on a supercharger.
Old 08-24-2004, 03:59 PM
  #71  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
StealthZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JamRWS6
Don't listen to the dealers.....they have no clue 99% of the time.

My local dealer told me there isn't such thing as a C6 Corvette. Don't believe anything a dealer says.

It's 100% sure that it will be called a z06, not a z07. Also I will say this, believe it or not, it will be a 6.4L producing just under 500hp.
Old 08-24-2004, 04:49 PM
  #72  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Project GMX245 Z06 is the official project name of the new car... Its going to be called Z06...

500HP is the target.
Old 08-25-2004, 01:20 PM
  #73  
On The Tree
 
98TXFBODY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Used to live in South Texas, Now in North Carolina
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I work at a ford dealer. If you want to find something out don't ask sales dept. Everysales men here is a moron. And they don't care about the ones they can't sell yet. Most of the time only the guys in service can tell you something.
Old 08-25-2004, 02:15 PM
  #74  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
bad2000ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phear_this_mind
I am going to say this ONE time at the end of the thread:

- 6.4 ltr engine
- 475 HP first year, 500 subsequent
- The Z06 namesake remains, there will be no mass produced "Z07"
- Body modifications will be both functional and aesthetic
- No magnetic ride selection, all major suspension/brake components will be upgraded
- $9,000 over Base C6 manual
Its seems that everyone is firm with the 6.4 liter idea.

I think most would agree that GM will not order/build/manufacture a different crankshaft for use with the new LS2 block to make the 6.4 liter mark. It would not be as cost effective.

It would seem to me the most cost effect way to achieve 6.4L would be to continue using the 3.622" crank, rods, pistons, basically the whole damn rotating assembly with a larger bore cylinder block (4.125"). Especially if they plan to build the car in mass quantities. I doubt GM would use any kind of forged components in the rotating assembly.

Like I said before I'm crossing my fingers for a mass produced 4.125" bore aluminum block that would probably be a third of the price of the C5R.

Old 08-27-2004, 08:51 AM
  #75  
TECH Fanatic
 
SS00Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bad2000ss
It would seem to me the most cost effect way to achieve 6.4L would be to continue using the 3.622" crank, rods, pistons, basically the whole damn rotating assembly with a larger bore cylinder block (4.125").
It does not seem too likely that they'll use the same pistons if they go with your hypothesized bore enlargement. Also, emissions will leap into the stratosphere with that large of a bore. So, that said, increased emissions and eight new pistons with rings vs. a new die set for a (relatively) limited run of longer strokes and pistons with adjusted pin height (possibly already available in another engine configuration (?))... Hard to say which way they'll go, but the current engineering trend seems to indicate that smaller bores are preferable for emissions and economy.

SC-

Last edited by SS00Blue; 08-27-2004 at 09:26 AM.
Old 08-27-2004, 01:13 PM
  #76  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Bore is 103.8MM (4.125)
Old 08-27-2004, 03:41 PM
  #77  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
bad2000ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J-Rod
Bore is 103.8MM (4.125)
Hmmmm....

A 103.8mm bore comes out to 4.087".

Unless my calculations are incorrect, 4.125" bore = 104.78mm.

Perhaps that was a typo and you meant 104.8???

103.8mm would put them short of 6.3L with a 3.622" crankshaft.

Old 08-31-2004, 11:12 PM
  #78  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
baddogz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin, TX by way of Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98TXFBODY
Everysales men here is a moron. And they don't care about the ones they can't sell yet.
Would you if you weren't an enthusiast? I sold for 3 years... But I knew more about the HI-PO projects than most of the techs did. Why? Because I care.
Old 09-01-2004, 06:35 PM
  #79  
On The Tree
 
TD's z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: TEA
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so what ever the ls7 turns out to be I can't wait to get one of the heads here so I can start grinding on it... sorry I meen start port development!
Old 10-17-2004, 04:17 AM
  #80  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Worm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlackTA
I just checked the Dodge website, and it says the NeonNeonNeon-10 has a curb weight of only 3380 lbs. Thats crazy, how can such a huge car, with a huge engine, and huge wheels weigh less than 3400 lbs? must be made of foam.
Huge car? That things the size of a ******* miata.


Quick Reply: z07



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.