Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Z06 in Motor Trend

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2005 | 10:47 PM
  #1  
BLOODTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Likes: 1
Default Z06 in Motor Trend

The October '05 issue of Motor Trend has a good article on the '06 Z06.
Not estimates here, M/T tests. Ok, 0-60 in 3.5 secs and 1/4 in 11.5 secs @127.1 mph. Very good considering the fastest recorded times for the new Ferrari 430 was 0-60 in 3.5 secs. and 1/4 in 11.7 @120.1 mph.(http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....&page_number=2)
Old 09-14-2005 | 11:13 PM
  #2  
radz282003's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Tree-Hugging, Bug eating CALI'
Default

I say: F' the GT.
Old 09-14-2005 | 11:23 PM
  #3  
BurnOut's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
From: Dallas-freakin'-Texas
Default

The trap speed for the Z06 indicates that it is more traction limited than the Ferrari. Put 'em both on slicks, and watch the difference in ET go from 2/10 to closer to probably a good 8/10 to a full second.
Old 09-14-2005 | 11:29 PM
  #4  
VIPRETR2's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah but Road and Track tested that Ferrari, not MT. Did you see R&Ts test of the new Z06? Pathetic, they busted like a 12.2@116 or some godawfull time like that. Not taking up for the Italian, I'm just busting on R&T, the new Z06 is awesome.
Old 09-15-2005 | 10:48 AM
  #5  
12stones's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

I know my jaw dropped when i saw 11.5@127 i was expecting impressive times but thats pretty damn soild. Even with it being from the standard not worth a damn magazine. Guess thats what a LS7+3100lbs gets you!
Old 09-15-2005 | 11:09 AM
  #6  
LS1FC3's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by VIPRETR2
Yeah but Road and Track tested that Ferrari, not MT. Did you see R&Ts test of the new Z06? Pathetic, they busted like a 12.2@116 or some godawfull time like that. Not taking up for the Italian, I'm just busting on R&T, the new Z06 is awesome.
That was prety lame. Their 0-60 time was around 4.2...LAME!!

LS7 + 2600lbs...it'll happen one day...
Old 09-15-2005 | 11:19 AM
  #7  
Adrian87GN's Avatar
On The Tree

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

127mph stock?! ****!!
Old 09-15-2005 | 01:48 PM
  #8  
VA2001SS's Avatar
On The Tree

 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Good on Motor Trend for driving it like it should be, Road & Track must have been grannying the thing.
Old 09-15-2005 | 02:12 PM
  #9  
427's Avatar
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 6
From: Clayton, North Carolina
Default

We just ran one on the chassis dyno. It made 454 to the wheels. Car was 29XX pounds.

Kurt
Old 09-15-2005 | 02:27 PM
  #10  
GregWS6&z28's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: Portsmouth, VA
Default

Originally Posted by 427
We just ran one on the chassis dyno. It made 454 to the wheels. Car was 29XX pounds.

Kurt
dayumm! so what, it's seeing more like 530-540 crank horsepower???
Old 09-15-2005 | 02:56 PM
  #11  
LoPeY's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
From: The other, other, other A-Town, NM
Default

A set of tires is all that it will take to put that car into the 10s.
Old 09-15-2005 | 03:01 PM
  #12  
Hardtop's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,706
Likes: 0
From: LaPlata, Md.
Default

Originally Posted by 427
We just ran one on the chassis dyno. It made 454 to the wheels. Car was 29XX pounds.

Kurt
Wow.

Bruce
Old 09-15-2005 | 03:10 PM
  #13  
00 Z-28's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: Crosby, Texas
Default

And I think it only uses 3 gears to get through the 1/4...



Originally Posted by 12stones
I know my jaw dropped when i saw 11.5@127 i was expecting impressive times but thats pretty damn soild. Even with it being from the standard not worth a damn magazine. Guess thats what a LS7+3100lbs gets you!
Old 09-15-2005 | 03:33 PM
  #14  
blackz93's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 1
From: nc
Default

Originally Posted by 427
We just ran one on the chassis dyno. It made 454 to the wheels. Car was 29XX pounds.

Kurt

Kurt, any chance you might have a graph? Just curious what it looks like!

And damn, that's a little on the light side too!
Old 09-15-2005 | 09:49 PM
  #15  
x phantom x's Avatar
STF veteran / 10 second club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,376
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

.
Wow that's amazing. Definately going to be a ridiculous car with some slicks.
Old 09-20-2005 | 02:34 PM
  #16  
Fadi's Avatar
Staging Lane

 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 427
We just ran one on the chassis dyno. It made 454 to the wheels. Car was 29XX pounds.

Kurt
Hey guys, I am new here and will be getting a C6 Z06 soon. Knowing that, this post caught my attention.

You say the car dynoed at 454 rwhp, and that car weighed in at 29xx lbs. But according to GM specs, the Z06 weighs in at 3130 lbs, so how can this be? Or am i missing something that I don't know about? Thanks

Also, like previously stated, do you have the dyno graph for that pull?
Old 09-20-2005 | 02:45 PM
  #17  
WS-Sick's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
From: The point of no return...
Default

I would also like to know about the weight on the Z you dynoed. I've been hoping it's lighter than the released specs.
Old 09-20-2005 | 04:51 PM
  #18  
427's Avatar
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 6
From: Clayton, North Carolina
Default

I missed the weight by a bunch. 316x was what it weighed. It must be my age!!



Kurt
Attached Thumbnails Z06 in Motor Trend-lastscan.jpg  
Old 09-20-2005 | 05:00 PM
  #19  
ForceFedC5's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 233
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by 427
We just ran one on the chassis dyno. It made 454 to the wheels. Car was 29XX pounds.

Kurt
That was on a MUSTANG DYNO? What the heck would that be on a DYNOJET??
Old 09-20-2005 | 05:19 PM
  #20  
marcus769's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

Why is the year 2005 Corvette??? At any rate, those are HUGE stock numbers... DAMN.......................... For the price! HOLY ***********************!!!

I thought the ASE rating for the new LS7 was 505 hp... does this mean 505 dynoed HP or what does this value mean to anyone?


Quick Reply: Z06 in Motor Trend



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.