Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Is 700 N/A hp achievable with 441ci

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2006, 02:02 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
adams2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Is 700 N/A hp achievable with 441ci

Hey guys, ive been looking into building a motor for a while and my goal is 700 N/A hp. I want the motor to be solid, so I might have to tone things down a bit.??? Also I cant go higher than 10.5:1 CR because I can only get 91 octane out here in cali. Here's the base components im looking at.

-Warhawk tall block 4.125" bore 10.5 CR
-Lunati Pro Series 4.125" stroke crank
-Manley Lightweight I beam rods
-Futral motorsports cam 239/246 - 114+4 .612/632 (specs could easily be changed)
-High flow heads (something that will flow in the 350-360cfm range)
-Fast intake with 90mm throttle body

Guys keep in mind that I want this motor to be solid (last a decent amount of time before rebuilding) and run on pump (91 octane) gas.
Old 02-21-2006, 03:57 AM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Nate_Taufer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For that big of a block forget the Fast 90/90 and go with a sheet metal or a ported ls7 intake. It can't even support enough air for the 402 buildups. I would say **** an off the shelf cam and get something tailored specifically to your heads and peripherals that you do so choose. The ETP 255's or perhaps the World LS7X heads would be nicely suited to that application. And if you're going to go with a 4.125" stroke, why not get a 4.25" stroke? It's the same price for the lunati.

Don't get caught up in Static compression ratio numbers. I can make a 10.5:1 SCR motor detonate like hell with a small cam where a 11.5:1 with a big cam might not even flinch. Dynamic compression ratio is where it's at. Talk to a motor builder and see what's right for your application and let them do the design process. After all they do this a hell of a lot more than you do.

Nate
Old 02-21-2006, 09:42 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
RedHardSupra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

what's the target rpm?
Old 02-21-2006, 09:45 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yes, i'm shooting for the same thing with a smaller 434, but with a sb2.2 intake and 1550cfm throttle body, solid roller with big lift, 11.7 to 1 compression, and 7500rpm.
Old 02-21-2006, 10:29 AM
  #5  
Launching!
 
BUYAMERICAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To hit that, you will need a lot more solid roller cam, better flowing heads, a lot of compression, less stroke, custom intake, dry sump, about 30-50k and no it will not run on 91.

People get caught up in hp numbers. Build a simple 550/550-575/575 motor that you can turn the key and enjoy. It will be just as fast on the street. When I was N/A, I could spin my 100 wear rating 12" tires at 90 mph..

Talk to Rick at Synergy. http://synergymotorsports.net/
510.796.3749 He only builds his motors in house (no internet turn/burn); he takes about 10-15 hours more on each one and has at least a half dozen stroker builds going on now (this is very important).

Edit. I am talking rwhp on the above, with a hydralic cam.

Last edited by BUYAMERICAN; 02-21-2006 at 10:44 PM.
Old 02-21-2006, 12:25 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

well i hope you can get here with 441cubic inch. American Speed can get you 720 bhp on a 406!

Chris.
Old 02-21-2006, 12:35 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Comp cams almost got there (675hp) with an efi, 410", 10.5 to 1, sb2 headed motor with a 230/236 590ish lift solid roller, at 6800rpm. It is not as hard as some would have you believe. Your heads and intake setup will be your biggest deciding factor. Good luck.

http://www.compcams.com/community/pr...69camaro-1997/
Old 02-21-2006, 03:57 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Greg Fell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Morton IL
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I assume you are wanting 700 hp at the flywheel? bhp not rwhp?
Old 02-21-2006, 05:08 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
BigBronco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes that can be done Naturally aspirated.

It will be tough on pump gas but definately achievable
Old 02-21-2006, 05:20 PM
  #10  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by adams2003
Hey guys, ive been looking into building a motor for a while and my goal is 700 N/A hp. I want the motor to be solid, so I might have to tone things down a bit.??? Also I cant go higher than 10.5:1 CR because I can only get 91 octane out here in cali. Here's the base components im looking at.

-Warhawk tall block 4.125" bore 10.5 CR
-Lunati Pro Series 4.125" stroke crank
-Manley Lightweight I beam rods
-Futral motorsports cam 239/246 - 114+4 .612/632 (specs could easily be changed)
-High flow heads (something that will flow in the 350-360cfm range)
-Fast intake with 90mm throttle body

Guys keep in mind that I want this motor to be solid (last a decent amount of time before rebuilding) and run on pump (91 octane) gas.
Don't take this the wrong way but that seems to be a very mismatched combo. You got a HUGE MOTOR with a tiny cam and BIG HEADS and small intake. Here's my .02 setup...

-Warhawk tall block 4.125" bore 10.5 CR
-Lunati Pro Series 4.125" stroke crank
-Manley Lightweight I beam rods
-ET Splayed valve heads 265cc
-Jesel J2k Rockers
- Solid valvetrain
-2" headers
-260-280 duration cam .650-.750 lift ~110 LSA
-Sheet Metal intake 105+mm TB
- 13.0:1+ CR
Phil
Old 02-21-2006, 05:32 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
thislswon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: seymour indiana
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its definately achievable, but u ned a bigger cam and a custom fabricated sheetmetal intake,to get that on pump gas will be a lil harder, but anything can be achieved for the money!!!!!
Old 02-21-2006, 06:23 PM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Phil99vette
Don't take this the wrong way but that seems to be a very mismatched combo. You got a HUGE MOTOR with a tiny cam and BIG HEADS and small intake. Here's my .02 setup...

-Warhawk tall block 4.125" bore 10.5 CR
-Lunati Pro Series 4.125" stroke crank
-Manley Lightweight I beam rods
-ET Splayed valve heads 265cc
-Jesel J2k Rockers
- Solid valvetrain
-2" headers
-260-280 duration cam .650-.750 lift ~110 LSA
-Sheet Metal intake 105+mm TB
- 13.0:1+ CR
Phil
Unless something has changed, the ET splayed heads are 285cc's and not for street use. The 265's like I have however are "offset" and very useable on the street. With that cam size and intake, he better be happy with 8k rpm's. His goals are atainable with a high compression, solid cammed, FAST 90 setup. Hypothetcally speaking, were looking at 595 rwhp to obtain 700fwhp. I agree that the set-up may not be optimum, but it all depends on the options that fit your needs. For 90% of people, sheet metal intakes won't cut it on the street. The FAST 90, unfortuantlly, is the best thing we have to work with for under $1500. He's already ruled out high compression, so I'm gunna say, build you combo around your needs, and be happy with anything over 500 rwhp. I would personally use:

-Warhawk tall block 4.125"(more if possible) bore 11.5 CR
-Lunati Pro Series 4.185" stroke crank (448 ci at no more cost, plus added TQ from the stroke.)
-SCAT H- beam rods
-ET heads 265cc
-Jesel Mohawk "lightened series" Rockers (Only ones avalible for 265's)
-Big hydraulic cam (250+ durations) and keep DCR at a 91 octane user level.
-Kooks 1 7/8" stepped to 2" headers
-FAST 90/90

I say this because of the "reliability" you asked for in the begining. You should be able to knock down 550+ rwhp with the above combo, putting you just shy of 700fwhp with a killer, street friendly combo.
Old 02-21-2006, 09:09 PM
  #13  
9 Second Club
 
Nickn20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Unless something has changed, the ET splayed heads are 285cc's and not for street use. The 265's like I have however are "offset" and very useable on the street. With that cam size and intake, he better be happy with 8k rpm's. His goals are atainable with a high compression, solid cammed, FAST 90 setup. Hypothetcally speaking, were looking at 595 rwhp to obtain 700fwhp. I agree that the set-up may not be optimum, but it all depends on the options that fit your needs. For 90% of people, sheet metal intakes won't cut it on the street. The FAST 90, unfortuantlly, is the best thing we have to work with for under $1500. He's already ruled out high compression, so I'm gunna say, build you combo around your needs, and be happy with anything over 500 rwhp. I would personally use:

-Warhawk tall block 4.125"(more if possible) bore 11.5 CR
-Lunati Pro Series 4.185" stroke crank (448 ci at no more cost, plus added TQ from the stroke.)
-SCAT H- beam rods
-ET heads 265cc
-Jesel Mohawk "lightened series" Rockers (Only ones avalible for 265's)
-Big hydraulic cam (250+ durations) and keep DCR at a 91 octane user level.
-Kooks 1 7/8" stepped to 2" headers
-FAST 90/90

I say this because of the "reliability" you asked for in the begining. You should be able to knock down 550+ rwhp with the above combo, putting you just shy of 700fwhp with a killer, street friendly combo.
I think this combo might make a little more than 550 rwhp, there are 408s doing this with less head, and we are working with 40 more cubes... my guess 575-600 rwhp, unless the intake really holds back the motor. I did notice you put the plus on there Now if someone were to get crazy and got a sheetmetal or the 8 TB harrop intake and make that work, we could go plus another 50-70 hp from what they have told me..... this is assuming with a 6 speed of course. Damn I need to start building a new motor.
Old 02-21-2006, 10:39 PM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nickn20
I think this combo might make a little more than 550 rwhp, there are 408s doing this with less head, and we are working with 40 more cubes... my guess 575-600 rwhp, unless the intake really holds back the motor. I did notice you put the plus on there Now if someone were to get crazy and got a sheetmetal or the 8 TB harrop intake and make that work, we could go plus another 50-70 hp from what they have told me..... this is assuming with a 6 speed of course. Damn I need to start building a new motor.
I always like to keep my guesstimations on the low side, so I stick with the low+ thing. As for the 8 TB intake, not everyone is as crazy as me. Many don't want to spend that kind of money on a intake, but soon they will realize they are a huge restriction to the potential of the heads we have avalible to us.
Old 02-21-2006, 11:21 PM
  #15  
TECH Regular
 
TopFlite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 415 Northern CA
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What about running less compression, 9:1 or 9:5.1 with more timing? I got the 91 octane problem myself.
Old 02-21-2006, 11:27 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't think you will need the 13:1 compression, or a cam over 260. However, the Fast 90 could be challenged. Single plane carb style, sheet metal, ITB, something on the intake to flow more air.

The ET 265 sounds about right. And it is definitely a solid roller cam.
Old 04-16-2006, 01:54 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
disco192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston/ Austin, TX
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

With some nasty cylinder heads and enough cubes, it could easily be done. 700 fwhp isnt that tough (its only money right). 700 wheel and you might be getting a little tough.... you would need some SICK heads, 450 cubes, solid roller, and a carb style intake to take you up to 8k rpm. And you are asking alot to do it on 91 octane.

There are also a ton of little tricks that could make it easier....
Old 04-16-2006, 05:52 PM
  #18  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperSporttruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Redondo Beach,CA
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't wanna steal the thread from adam but, it seems like a few guys chimmed in here. I am looking for "600 bhp" with a 402/408. Anyone have any recommendations for compression, cam, heads, intake. I am looking to run 91 octane as well. This will be in a truck with a 3000 stall, and must be streetable enough for a daily driver. Thanks
Old 04-18-2006, 01:14 AM
  #19  
On The Tree
 
93turboLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't understand we you all are telling him to go with the sheetmetal intake and crazy aftermarket heads when (two threads up) a stock LS7 with lightly ported exhaust ports, cam and bolt ons is at 620rwhp. Even if they tone it down to say 600rwhp and make it drive a little better, this is being achieved with a relitively untouched motor with 11.1:1 compression (91 octane safe) and it comes out to be around 700bhp. buy a stock LS7, and rework it until its to your desired hp level, which obvouisly won't take much at all. why is it harder than that?
Old 04-18-2006, 09:38 AM
  #20  
Teching In
 
helgabeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its not that hard to make power, and it dosnt take a **** load of money. it dose take money but not like 30 grand. my 2nd cousin has a 427 sbc and it is n/a. its carborated with mildly poprted afr heads and a pretty grumpy bumpstick. i think .612 lift at 260 @ .050 or somthing like that. it made 600 or so hp on pump gas. and here you guys are with your all aluminum cnc ported efi **** only making mid 600's? wtf


Quick Reply: Is 700 N/A hp achievable with 441ci



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.