SAM's 500" LS2 Project *Progress Pics*
The guys at S.A.M. " touched up " the LS7 heads as they do before putting them on and reported some pretty healthy numbers. I'm not sure if anyone is taking advantage of the larger bore and unshrouding the valves for big bore heads like this or our std deck height big bore set-up. It would be interesting to see how that affects flow #'s.
i total agree about the "2000bhp" that keeps getting thrown about. so i take it you have real world tested this block to 1500bhp?? was that on N2o or another power adder??
thanks and sorry for all the question.
Chris.
The 1500 test is a computer analysis using Finite Element Analysis to test a design as in the previous post. FI would be the way to go to achieve power levels in that area. A nitrous motor would have to have a NA baseline in the 900-1000 HP range to achieve that goal with a 600 NOS shot. The static compression will have to be to high to achieve the 2HP/ CI to safely spray that much nitrous on any engine for long. Most of the 2000 HP NOS motors used in the outlaws are 600+ C.I. and some are in the 800+ displacement.
I'm not familiar with the 402 graph, but here is the pump gas, LS7 intake #'s that were posted.
LS2-500 LS2-500, 250 NOS
HP TQ HP TQ
4100 466 597
4200 484 605
4300 505 617
4400 524 626
4500 552 644 552 644
4600 569 650 645 737
4700 581 650 774 865
4800 595 651 827 905
4900 607 651 844 905
5000 619 650 861 904
5100 630 648 876 902
5200 639 646 888 897
5300 649 643 897 889
5400 659 641 902 877
5500 666 636 909 868
5600 673 632 914 857
5700 679 626 919 847
5800 685 621 921 834
5900 691 615 922 821
6000 694 608 922 807
6100 697 600 920 792
6200 700 593 917 777
6300 702 585 913 761
6400 703 576
Peak TQ give idea of if everything is working together. I have no doubt that someone is going to get one of these to over 1000HP n/a. Someone will get a 427CI over 1000HP n/a. So the 500CI should be able to do 1100HP or so.
LS2-500 LS2-500, 250 NOS
HP TQ HP TQ
4100 466 597
4200 484 605
4300 505 617
4400 524 626
4500 552 644 552 644
4600 569 650 645 737
4700 581 650 774 865
4800 595 651 827 905
4900 607 651 844 905
5000 619 650 861 904
5100 630 648 876 902
5200 639 646 888 897
5300 649 643 897 889
5400 659 641 902 877
5500 666 636 909 868
5600 673 632 914 857
5700 679 626 919 847
5800 685 621 921 834
5900 691 615 922 821
6000 694 608 922 807
6100 697 600 920 792
6200 700 593 917 777
6300 702 585 913 761
6400 703 576 whenever trying to post something like this, you have you put [/code] [/code] tag around it.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
This set-up was a MILD NA pump gas, drive anywhere, no Gears, stall converter required, bolt your heads,intake and valvetrain on our short block set-up. It didn't even have a rough idle since the cubes utilized all of the cam. Add a 250 shot and you have over 900 HP and Tq on demand (total sleeper). I'm sure that there will be much wilder set-ups with different components that will be built.
As chuntington101 mentioned that the new 2.8 KB set-up would be nuts from the graphs posted with a 402 set-up. It looks as if it would not have an issue feeding the extra cubes since americanHP stated they had it cut back.
Outlaw Motorsports, I'll find out on the camera. One of the guys here takes the pictures and will be glad to here you like them.
i would love to see one of these motors with some boost! you would only need a few pounds (say 8-9psi) to have a monster on you hands! stick a set of worked LS7 heads on there and a ProCharger/Vortech/trubo(s) and watch it fly!
thanks Chris.
Solid Roller, 7,XXX rpm, 15+:1 Compression, HIGH 800's can be done.
I would personaly love to see an F1/2/3R strapped on one to see what it would throw down as well. Like I have said before, it has been a blast working with ERL on this motor.
Outlaw - Our camera here that I use is a Sony 8.1 mp DSC-V3 Some what aged, but works well!
427 maxed out with the ET Canted valves 15:1 CR, right cam, header, even with singleplane carb intake and correct carb should be able to rip out about 900HP.
With dual carbs tunnel ram would make 50-75HP over that so about 975HP and about 640TQ.
Now take the 427 bottom end out, replace it with 500CI. That will be worth proportinate TQ increase, so maxed out should see close to 750TQ. On HP it will not be a hp per cube or more increase for just change of the bottom end. There will be some gain, lets say 1/2 HP per cube or 1050HP.
I Believe these numbers.
Solid Roller, 7,XXX rpm, 15+:1 Compression, HIGH 800's can be done.
I would personaly love to see an F1/2/3R strapped on one to see what it would throw down as well. Like I have said before, it has been a blast working with ERL on this motor.
Outlaw - Our camera here that I use is a Sony 8.1 mp DSC-V3 Some what aged, but works well!
hey gray next time you talk to sean over at ERL tell him i said whats up....this is Fran by the way...
Gray and everyone at S.A.M. that worked on this project has been great. After seeing some preliminary results from the max. effort 440" build it shows how well they did with major low dollar pieces by comparison on a streetable pump gas build. It goes to show there's no replacement for displacement in NA motors.
It will be good to see it in the camaro. Post pics. as you can.
haha na there all good sean.... we have the photo shoot for joshes car tomorrow so that should be pretty cool.....
All out race engines make what you are talking about at 1.52 foot pounds per inch! No normal pump gas 408 makes any 620 foot pounds of TQ! Am I missing something earlier? This engine is a lower compression street pump gas engine not a 15 to 1 race engine.
Peak TQ give idea of if everything is working together. I have no doubt that someone is going to get one of these to over 1000HP n/a. Someone will get a 427CI over 1000HP n/a. So the 500CI should be able to do 1100HP or so.
All out race engines make what you are talking about at 1.52 foot pounds per inch! No normal pump gas 408 makes any 620 foot pounds of TQ! Am I missing something earlier? This engine is a lower compression street pump gas engine not a 15 to 1 race engine.
tell him erik haha.....



I didn't know that!Thanks! Sorry.............back on topic.


