Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

#7 Piston Failure FIX !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2006, 07:18 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default #7 Piston Failure FIX !!!

I found this tip reading Will Handzel's book How to Build High-Performance Chevy LS1/LS6 V-8's.

When GM started using the LS6 Intake manifold they omitted the rear steam vent tubes on rear of heads and used only a front vent tube version because of clearence issues with the lower floor of the LS6 manifold. Some road racers say blocking off the rear steam ports will cause detonation and damage the #7 piston. Here is the cure and I quote from book:

"TIP: Some road racers have been using the pre-LS6 steam tubes underneath the LS6 intake to improve cooling in cylinder number 7 (they previously had detonation problems in that hole). While the pre LS6 rear steam version was not used on factory LS6's, they will fit under the intake by slightly grinding down some of the stiffening ribs on the bottom side of the intake. Some racers just install the steam tube component and, during rebuilds, find some small indentions where the ribs come in contact with it and grind away for clearence."

Can we use the pre LS6 vent tube with the FAST intake?
.

Last edited by gollum; 04-16-2006 at 06:07 PM.
Old 04-06-2006, 08:59 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
speedracerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

pre ls6 vent tube will not fit under the lsx intake!
although there is enough room to use another front on the rear and use a hose to connect the 2
Old 04-06-2006, 11:26 AM
  #3  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Has this actually been tested by anyone? I'm not sure it's a good/bad idea. A pic of exactly how it goes on and works would be helpful.
Old 04-06-2006, 11:56 AM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
black_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

IM interested in this, especially once I start spraying.
Old 04-06-2006, 09:20 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
mr2guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It wouldn't be too hard to fab up a cross over that fits using an existing cross over.
Old 04-06-2006, 09:28 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
jay_99z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by gollum
I found this tip reading Will Handzel's book How to Build High-Performance Chevy LS1/LS6 V-8's.

When GM started using the LS6 Intake manifold they omitted the rear steam vent tubes on rear of heads and used only a front vent tube version because of clearence issues with the lower floor of the LS6 manifold. Some road racers say blocking off the rear steam ports will cause detonation and damage the #7 piston. Here is the cure and I quote from book:

"TIP: Some road racers have been using the pre-LS6 steam tubes underneath the LS6 intake to improve cooling in cylinder number 7 (they previously had detonation problems in that hole). While the pre LS6 rear steam version was not used on factory LS6's, they will fit under the intake by slightly grinding down some of the stiffening ribs on the bottom side of the intake. Some racers just install the steam tube component and, during rebuilds, find some small indentions where the ribs come in contact with it."

Can we use the pre LS6 vent tube with the FAST intake?
.

Here's a question......out of all of those that had #7 go.....how many had the stock LS1 intake and coolant lines on?

Are most of the trashed #7's running LS6 intakes?
Old 04-06-2006, 10:18 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jay_99z
Are most of the trashed #7's running LS6 intakes?
Or FAST intakes?
Old 04-06-2006, 10:20 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Does anybody know if the rear steam vents are plugged on stock LS2 engines?
Old 04-06-2006, 10:35 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
GrannySShifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 3,944
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

power adders motors will still tend to die first on number 7
Old 04-06-2006, 11:05 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mefis
Posts: 2,609
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

I think us truck guys still have that rear crossover tube. Some people have knocked out #7 with the truck intake and the crossover tube.

8ALTNG if I'm not mistaken.
Old 04-06-2006, 11:30 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Proper tune, and running your fattest injector on #7 will help this problem.
Old 04-07-2006, 08:45 PM
  #12  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I have the LS6 intake on my 2000 f-body and when I put it on, I was cheap (actually they didn't have the block off lines) and just grinded down the areas under the ls6 intake so that I could keep the stock vent tubes.
Old 04-08-2006, 06:21 AM
  #13  
Teching In
 
Spdrcrj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL.
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

#7 is what let go on my procharged Z06. Sounds like that book is something I need to buy.
Old 04-08-2006, 06:42 AM
  #14  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

I looked into this tube, and I will just about guarintee that putting it on isn't going to fix the problem with #7 failing. The intake, the way it is designed causes the air to be slammed into the back of the intake, and #7 being the last one in the back of the intake is going to always get the most amount of air.. in translation, this tube really willl not make any difference, because the real problem isn't with the cooling system, it is with the intake design.

Like stated above, putting the heaviest injector in #7 is the only thing you can really do that will have any real impact on this matter. If a DP nitrous kit is being run, it's probably an easier thing to deal with (on a race car that sees nothign but WOT) because one smaller nitrous jet, or a size or 2 up on the fuel jet can be done and the problem is pretty much solved.
Old 04-08-2006, 07:52 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
sross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I have the LS6 intake on my 2000 f-body and when I put it on, I was cheap (actually they didn't have the block off lines) and just grinded down the areas under the ls6 intake so that I could keep the stock vent tubes.

I did the same thing. Works fine with the LS6 intake. (Can't speak for the LSX though.)
Old 04-17-2006, 07:36 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Read this:

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
Just wanted to throw this out there..I have seen 3 LS1 cars with a random misfire on #7, one with a dead miss, with the fuel system being a "dead head" system(no return to tank)...I tore down the fuel rails on all 3 cars....all cars were FULL of trash in the rear drivers side of the rail(#7)..all 3 cars were fixed with a cleaning and clean injectors. They picked up SERIOUS amounts of power.


Maybe look at this in the future.


David
Old 04-17-2006, 07:53 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Vertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Winchester,VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gollum
Read this:
So how is trash getting into the rear of the fuel rails? Wouldn't that indicate a filter problem? Or is he stating that there was trash found in the rear of the intake indicating a bad airfilter?
Old 04-17-2006, 09:13 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
 
firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: TAMPA by way of MIAMI!!!
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I understood it to mean the fuel rail. On dead head systems, I can see that happening because even a great filter lets somethings pass through and eventually you'd get a build up of junk.
Old 04-17-2006, 09:34 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

i have a theory
Old 04-17-2006, 10:05 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
 
firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: TAMPA by way of MIAMI!!!
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

and.....


Quick Reply: #7 Piston Failure FIX !!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM.