LS3 & L92 Info
Originally Posted by Wnts2Go10O
holy crap that intake on ebay just went for $690!! LG from LGM barely got outbid for it..lol.
Originally Posted by king jack
I got an l92 prototype intake from this same seller. Getting my heads ported now and anxious to put them on my 408 stroker.
L92 heads and L76 intake are going on a LS2 402 that we're building. Probably another 3 weeks before we fire it up.
BTW: Just ordered the Ram Dual disc clutch for the new setup.
Originally Posted by king jack
What cam are you going to use?
Originally Posted by 52172
so can we use our ls1 rockers with the l-92 heads as long as they come with the rocker stands? Is it true the only heads that need to offset rocker arms are the ls7's?
so I can use my comp pro mags on the exhaust side, but for the intake I need new l92 rocker arms? What is the price of the l92 rocker arms? Might as well just get all l92 rocker arms instead of using my comp pro mags for the exhaust. Thanks
www.sdpc2000.com The intake rockers are quite a bit cheaper than the exhaust rockers. It makes no sense.
Originally Posted by king jack
Dont blame you for waiting for flow numbers. I already have a g5x4 cam and think i'll try it.
Ordered the Ram Dual clutch yesterday - OUCH!
Ran into a problem today having my pistons flycut for my cam. Machine shop said not enough room for any more fly cutting toward the edge of pistons. The l92 heads valves are too close to outside edge of pistons. I have mahle pistons and g5x4 cam. Can anyone give me some info on this problem before I pull my hair out.
Originally Posted by king jack
Ran into a problem today having my pistons flycut for my cam. Machine shop said not enough room for any more fly cutting toward the edge of pistons. The l92 heads valves are too close to outside edge of pistons. I have mahle pistons and g5x4 cam. Can anyone give me some info on this problem before I pull my hair out.
Your only options are to reduce the thickness of the valves, lower the valve seats in the head, choose a thicker head gasket, shorten the cam duration or widen the lobe centers. Any combination of these choices will help, but not guarantee success. This will be a common theme with the L92 heads because so many piston manufacturers have pushed the ring package close to the crown of the piston.
Richard
Richard
Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
Your only options are to reduce the thickness of the valves, lower the valve seats in the head, choose a thicker head gasket, shorten the cam duration or widen the lobe centers. Any combination of these choices will help, but not guarantee success. This will be a common theme with the L92 heads because so many piston manufacturers have pushed the ring package close to the crown of the piston.
Richard
Richard














