LS3 & L92 Info
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...=l92+head+flow
Have fun!
Adrian
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
However, the car intake fits better for most applications
and the truck manifold is butt ugly
Are you talking about the L92 specificly or truck intakes in general. From what I read it seems they have a little better low end but peter out top end and that is on a stock motor. I wouldn't think that would be any good for any mods unless this intake doesn't follow the track record of the other truck intakes.
I have one as it is all that is available for my L92 stroker motor and I was assuming it was garbage for my application.
However, the car intake fits better for most applications
and the truck manifold is butt ugly

Last edited by BAKED; Aug 19, 2006 at 01:16 PM.
Are you talking about the L92 specificly or truck intakes in general. From what I read it seems they have a little better low end but peter out top end and that is on a stock motor. I wouldn't think that would be any good for any mods unless this intake doesn't follow the track record of the other truck intakes.
I have one as it is all that is available for my L92 stroker motor and I was assuming it was garbage for my application.
It's gonna take more than "a little love" to mate the FAST manifold to the L92 heads, and even more to make it work good with them. I know the FAST manifold is better than the productions cathedral port manifolds, but I'd be impressed if it's really any better than the L92's



