Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

LS3 & L92 Info

Old Aug 16, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #161  
Haans249's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 4
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

I agree, those heads aren't made to flow over .650" lift at the most. What ever that person posted was crap....here is some "real-world" numbers for people to look at...

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...=l92+head+flow

Have fun!
Adrian
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 04:17 PM
  #162  
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, MD
Default

Originally Posted by WicketMike
Would the L92 heads straight out the box with the intake setup compliment a stock LS2 GTO or would there be a better cam that would go with it. (what specs)
they would help but as with anything matching a cam to it will get you more
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 07:33 AM
  #163  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Can someone tell me if the "bare" L92 heads are a machined aluminum casting only or do they have valve seats and valve guides installed?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 08:49 AM
  #164  
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 5
From: Van Nuys, CA
Default

The L92 heads as sold by the dealers should have seats and guides installed.

Richard
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 09:03 AM
  #165  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Thanks Richard. Also, I have been doing searches for 2 days, everyone talks about the L92 truck intake and the carb intake but I have yet to find any part #'s or pics of either. If I have overlooked it i'm sorry. Everyone basically doesn't seem to care since most people here have a car and are concerned about an intake that will fit under the hood. I am mostly interested in using the carb intake. Any info would be appreciated.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #166  
Rock_Daddy's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 410
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

I have the truck intake in my garage if you want me to look at anything for you. I have a pile of stock stuff out of it.


Last edited by Rock_Daddy; Aug 17, 2006 at 10:05 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #167  
LSxChevelle's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 0
From: Enumclaw, WA
Default

Carb intake will be out in about a month. GMPP is making them.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #168  
LSxChevelle's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 0
From: Enumclaw, WA
Default

25534401 (carbed L92 intake)
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #169  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Originally Posted by LSxChevelle
25534401 (carbed L92 intake)
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 10:31 AM
  #170  
LSX Wizard's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: under the hood
Default

Originally Posted by BAKED
Does the truck intake outflow the car intake? Other than clearance issues what is the benifit of the car intake? Also what are the prices of both?
The truck manifold is actually a fair amount better on power in the mid range, and a touch on the top end. However, the car intake fits better for most applications and the truck manifold is butt ugly
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 01:20 PM
  #171  
Rock_Daddy's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 410
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

Wizard,

Are you talking about the L92 specificly or truck intakes in general. From what I read it seems they have a little better low end but peter out top end and that is on a stock motor. I wouldn't think that would be any good for any mods unless this intake doesn't follow the track record of the other truck intakes.

I have one as it is all that is available for my L92 stroker motor and I was assuming it was garbage for my application.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #172  
BAKED's Avatar
9 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 2
From: kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by LSX Wizard
The truck manifold is actually a fair amount better on power in the mid range, and a touch on the top end. However, the car intake fits better for most applications and the truck manifold is butt ugly
Ok, I seen where someone said that a FAST intake will fit the L92 heads with a little love, would it be worth it to do all the loving on the fast or just get a truck intake?

Last edited by BAKED; Aug 19, 2006 at 01:16 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 02:49 PM
  #173  
Rock_Daddy's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 410
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

The only places I saw someone say the fast might fit with some work got shot down I thought.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #174  
BAKED's Avatar
9 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 2
From: kentucky
Default

Hmmmmmm???
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 03:51 PM
  #175  
HEMIETR's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: Jenison, MI
Default

My reliable source said I'll have my intake within 30 days!??
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 07:21 PM
  #176  
LSX Wizard's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: under the hood
Default

Originally Posted by Rock_Daddy
Wizard,

Are you talking about the L92 specificly or truck intakes in general. From what I read it seems they have a little better low end but peter out top end and that is on a stock motor. I wouldn't think that would be any good for any mods unless this intake doesn't follow the track record of the other truck intakes.

I have one as it is all that is available for my L92 stroker motor and I was assuming it was garbage for my application.
Yes, this is specific to the L92 intakes. The truck manifold is good. The cathedral port truck manifolds are not as good as the c/p car manifolds.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #177  
LSX Wizard's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: under the hood
Default

Originally Posted by BAKED
Ok, I seen where someone said that a FAST intake will fit the L92 heads with a little love, would it be worth it to do all the loving on the fast or just get a truck intake? I already have a FAST intake but I could always sell/trade it for something else. Clearance is not an issue for me.

It's gonna take more than "a little love" to mate the FAST manifold to the L92 heads, and even more to make it work good with them. I know the FAST manifold is better than the productions cathedral port manifolds, but I'd be impressed if it's really any better than the L92's
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #178  
BAKED's Avatar
9 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 2
From: kentucky
Default

Thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 08:37 PM
  #179  
StreetnStrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closed ex-Sponsor Account
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 945
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by HEMIETR
My reliable source said I'll have my intake within 30 days!??
good luck with that i have a good source for getting parts too but damn GM wont relase the ****. The intake we need was supposed to be out back in may.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #180  
HEMIETR's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: Jenison, MI
Default

Originally Posted by StreetnStrip
good luck with that i have a good source for getting parts too but damn GM wont relase the ****. The intake we need was supposed to be out back in may.
They have been saying 30 days since May. I'm sure this will turn into a winter project!
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.