Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

LS3 & L92 Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 04:42 PM
  #381  
Abuckeye's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Ironton ohio
Default

I noticed that also
Reply
Old May 14, 2011 | 06:33 PM
  #382  
blownnova's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

Will LS3 heads bolt on to a LQ9 block? Are the rocker arms the same?
Reply
Old May 14, 2011 | 06:51 PM
  #383  
oakley6575's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,613
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by blownnova
Will LS3 heads bolt on to a LQ9 block? Are the rocker arms the same?
They bolt up to the block but they use offset intake rockers. The exhaust rockers are the same.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 09:04 AM
  #384  
brngrhd's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Default

what is the 6.0 that comes with L92 heads?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 09:27 AM
  #385  
HSV-GTS-300's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by brngrhd
what is the 6.0 that comes with L92 heads?
Called L98 in the southern hemisphere.
L76 (has AFM hardware) in Pontiac G8-GT
LY6 in trucks
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2011 | 12:02 AM
  #386  
gisqc's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

About to buy a truck 6.2l engine and thought it was a L92 at first, found out it's most likely a L94 engine... beside the usual difference with truck engines (+VVT and the AFM stuff) do these also have the good L92 heads castings?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2011 | 06:49 AM
  #387  
VortechC5's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: Black Forest, CO
Default

I can't answer the head question but the 6.2 pickup truck engines do not have AFM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2011 | 07:05 AM
  #388  
gisqc's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by VortechC5
I can't answer the head question but the 6.2 pickup truck engines do not have AFM.
It's suppose to be out of an escalade 2010, searches says it would be a L94... I got mixed up because the seller said it used the good L92 heads (I just thought it was a L92... reading to fast) so just trying to confirm that's true.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2011 | 07:18 AM
  #389  
VortechC5's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: Black Forest, CO
Default

The 6.2 engines do have the rectangular port heads if that is what you want to confirm.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2011 | 07:51 AM
  #390  
gisqc's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by VortechC5
The 6.2 engines do have the rectangular port heads if that is what you want to confirm.
Pretty much, just everyone talks about the L92 being almost the LS3, but no one really talks about L94 and L99 engines (or refer them as L92 with AFM... cause from some charts I saw L92 never had AFM). Is it just that the engines are very similar to with the addition of DOD/AFM but other than that those are almost LS3 to?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2011 | 08:17 AM
  #391  
VortechC5's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: Black Forest, CO
Default

Maybe the L92 does have AFM. Not sure on that. Everything that I have read says that the L99 does have both VVT and AFM. I fairly sure that all of the 6.2 engines have rectangular ports.

I was curious so I took a look and the 6.2 in my 11 Silverado is a L9H. It has VVT but no AFM.

Originally Posted by gisqc
Pretty much, just everyone talks about the L92 being almost the LS3, but no one really talks about L94 and L99 engines (or refer them as L92 with AFM... cause from some charts I saw L92 never had AFM). Is it just that the engines are very similar to with the addition of DOD/AFM but other than that those are almost LS3 to?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 08:56 PM
  #392  
gisqc's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

So apparently my motor wouldn't have Displacement on Demand (might be a 2009 not a 2010) but I have it in front of me now, how can I check this?

The head casting number is "823"... that's the only useful number I could find with a quick look. Also number on the ECU is 12625455 (which is no help... gives 2009-2010 years).

Is there anything that I could look at (an extra plug, something specific) to know if I have DOD or not.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2012 | 07:57 AM
  #393  
cmacknificent's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: ga
Default dod

Black plug on valley cover back of intake
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2012 | 07:22 PM
  #394  
Money2Burn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by gisqc
So apparently my motor wouldn't have Displacement on Demand (might be a 2009 not a 2010) but I have it in front of me now, how can I check this?

The head casting number is "823"... that's the only useful number I could find with a quick look. Also number on the ECU is 12625455 (which is no help... gives 2009-2010 years).

Is there anything that I could look at (an extra plug, something specific) to know if I have DOD or not.
GISQC The L92 was first put into the escalade in 2007 so even if you have a 09 escalade engine it is still the same. Displacement on Demand is now called Active Fuel Management they changed the way the system worked in 04 so they gave it the new name. You have whats called a Valve Lifter Oil Manifold Assembly located right under the big black plastic manifold. I attached a picture that will give you a idea of the plug that cmacknificent was talking about. Imagine your intake manifold right above this picture. Hope that helps.
Attached Thumbnails LS3 & L92 Info-afm.gif  
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 12:08 PM
  #395  
family-man's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: new york
Default

Just have a few questions...

1) So, only fully assembled L92 and/or LS3 Heads come with the better "worked" ports versus unassembled heads. I read that somewhere just couldnt remember...
2) I plan to do a mild cam in my LS2, from my understanding, the LS3 Heads comes with better intake valves vs. the L92, but would i need to use the stock intake valves or should i just get aftermarket valves and buy the bare castings? (but then i loose out on the assembled worked ports if it is true). my cam will be spec'd for a DD car. I dont plan on going over 500rwhp but if its for better piece of mind, ill go with whatever. any other components worth upgrading?
3) with the LS3/L76 Intake, do I need to order it assembled or can i use my LS2 rail, injectors, TB?

Last edited by family-man; Jan 22, 2012 at 12:28 PM.
Reply
Old May 23, 2012 | 04:30 PM
  #396  
speeddemongto's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

looks like the L92 head part number has been changed to 12629051 from looking around online for the bare head.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 07:03 PM
  #397  
AlterEgo's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Phenix City, AL.
Default

Originally Posted by speeddemongto
looks like the L92 head part number has been changed to 12629051 from looking around online for the bare head.
Is there a specific place, or book I can find all the info that I will need in order to find out what parts will fit on and mix and match with motors ranging from 4.8l-6.0l vortecs with stock parts off of all the modern LS engines???
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2012 | 03:43 PM
  #398  
Scotty_82's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default What engine is this?

Originally Posted by gisqc
Pretty much, just everyone talks about the L92.... but no one really talks about L94 and L99 engines (or refer them as L92 with AFM... cause from some charts I saw L92 never had AFM). ..............
I've recently become the not-so-proud owner of a 2008 Escalade L92 engine. Or that's what I was told, no vehicle VIN of course. I got just the basic engine w-heads & intake, but that's all. Got it for cheap because the block is junk, starter was sheared off along with that corner of the block. Ouch, nasty crash I'd think. Balancer looks unscathed though. Crank looks like a .002 runout on the nose, flywheel flange looks perfect. I'll need to investigate that runout further before investing in a block.

Upon disassembly, all looks in good shape, cylinders, not a hint of a ridge, and a little cross-hatch still visible. 6.2 for sure, 5364 heads, and truck style intake. Defintely has AFM though, which surprised me, and of course, VVT.

But made me curious just what the heck was this engine from??? Is it an L94? After searching this site, seems like no #'s on the block will tell me much. Or?? According to any info I can find, AFM didn't start until 2010??
So what the heck is this from?
.

Last edited by Scotty_82; Aug 26, 2012 at 03:52 PM. Reason: typo
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 11:26 AM
  #399  
Jarred Hitchens's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default L92 into 04 rcsb half ton

Good day everyone. I've read all 20 pages of this thread and I must say hats off to all of you. Tons of useful information. I'm wondering if someone has a list of parts they would need to swap an L92 into a 04 4x4 pickup. I currently have the 4.8 and 4l60e all in stock form. I'd like to swap the l92 with a 4l80e other than the reluctor wheel converter from linginfelter and a trans crossmember is there anything else a person might need to accomplish this. Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2020 | 11:12 AM
  #400  
Tugla's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

Hi gang...looking for info on heads
I have a 2007 l
L92 series 2(non do d engine)

looking for which heads I can bolt on as replacement without any changes or computer upgrades etc.
will a 6.0 L head work or which casting work or don't work as replacement....

also what are the best lifters to use. Have over
250 000 miles and seems time to change them before if any issue with the stock lifter.
thanks

Last edited by Tugla; May 10, 2020 at 04:21 PM. Reason: Typo error
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.