Katech sneek attack 346, 8000 rpms?!?
09-03-2006, 02:59 AM
#3
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wnts2Go10O
short stroke, big bore. lots of torque, lots of rev happy horsepower. im gonna guess the powerband will look similar to an ls1 but...more..
09-03-2006, 03:14 AM
#4
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're not gonna be able to spin it that high unless you have a dry sump setup at the minimum. Definitely have to be solid roller. Not really what you would want for your intended goals 99blancoSS
Nate
Nate
09-03-2006, 04:21 AM
#5
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DONAIMIAN
I cant see it having a lot of TQ, but I can see it having some nasty top end.
I would love to have a NA engine with no nitrous that can make 700 and rev to 8k. Sounds like a Nascar engine. GL guys
John
09-03-2006, 11:12 AM
#6
Originally Posted by Nate_Taufer
You're not gonna be able to spin it that high unless you have a dry sump setup at the minimum. Definitely have to be solid roller. Not really what you would want for your intended goals 99blancoSS
Nate
Nate
Trending Topics
09-03-2006, 09:56 PM
#8
Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
Katech sneek attack 346, 8000 rpms?!?
I'm shopping for a new setup. I'm guessing this is a solid roller? Any ideas on the power band?
I'm shopping for a new setup. I'm guessing this is a solid roller? Any ideas on the power band?
It uses a modified production lifter.
09-04-2006, 01:28 AM
#10
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
I was thinking that might be the case but it caught my eye so I thought I'd get some info on it.
FYI Tim Tosto spins his LS1 to 8100rpm through the traps with stock oil system. However for reliability I have heard the most you want to spin is about 7500 before the pickup starts getting starved for oil.
09-04-2006, 01:38 AM
#11
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Iranndia
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DONAIMIAN
I cant see it having a lot of TQ, but I can see it having some nasty top end.
09-04-2006, 01:41 AM
#12
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quick1998Z28
why? it's 346 cubic inches with a big bore, that'll make a lot of torque, you just need to gear/stall the car so you're in the powerband
09-05-2006, 10:43 AM
#13
11 Second Club
coolest small block is the 350 made from a 400 block and a 283 crank which is what this sounds like haha
i would love to have a high revvin small block...over 8K would be awesome
i would love to have a high revvin small block...over 8K would be awesome
09-05-2006, 12:18 PM
#14
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18013
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jerflash
coolest small block is the 350 made from a 400 block and a 283 crank which is what this sounds like haha
i would love to have a high revvin small block...over 8K would be awesome
i would love to have a high revvin small block...over 8K would be awesome
http://purplesagetradingpost.com/sum...%20engine.html
?
09-08-2006, 04:04 PM
#18
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NO-OPTION-2002
400 bore = 4.125"
283 stoke = 3.000"
That is 320.7ci, not quite a 350.
283 stoke = 3.000"
That is 320.7ci, not quite a 350.
09-08-2006, 06:23 PM
#20
TECH Resident
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: TAMPA by way of MIAMI!!!
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats what I've been thinking about doin. Take a 3.625" stock crank with a 4.19" bore sleeved/LS2 and get just shy of 400ci with long 6.2" rods you get an incredible rod ratio and at least from Dynosim you get some really good numbers.