Lifters: Morel vs. GMPP
#22
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin, TEXAS > *
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Dragaholic
280Z28, those are the other ones that I'm referring to in this thread.
Morels vs. GM Performance Parts race lifters
Morels vs. GM Performance Parts race lifters
#26
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Dragaholic
The way I look at it is, I had a '00 completely stock longblock (heads/bottom end) with the exception of a cam, valvetrain, oil pump, timing set, and rod bolts that spun 7200 rpms. That was using my factory '00 LS1 rocker arms and lifters. I figured if the lifters lived through those kind of rpms, why wouldn't the GMPP race lifters do so? I know that they were put in race Caddys, but as you mentioned, they did have a lightweight rotating assembly/valvetrain which makes a big difference. I plan on running right around the same rpm as I did with my old setup. Really, what I was looking for was people who are actually using the GMPP race lifters so that they can vouch for them. I already know the Morels are proven.
#27
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Dragaholic
I'll be using a set of L92 heads and with the huge 2.16 intake valve, kinda scares me.