1300rwhp
04-16-2007, 10:28 AM
#21
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quickin
If its built right, it CAN be done on pump gas. There are already turbo engines out there that make power like that on 91 octane. Gotta be built by the right person though and big cubes like 454ci, which the Warhawk can do.
But why not just use a 16 injector intake. Run on pump gas full time and than when you hit the throttle the other 8 injectors automatically start spraying race gas from a stand alone tank to a 75/25 mix of race/pump gas at a preselected boost/power level. All on the fly.
.
But why not just use a 16 injector intake. Run on pump gas full time and than when you hit the throttle the other 8 injectors automatically start spraying race gas from a stand alone tank to a 75/25 mix of race/pump gas at a preselected boost/power level. All on the fly.
.
Just hope that second pump doesn't fail...........
04-16-2007, 10:41 AM
#22
Launching!
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My 'ultimate vasco 400' from Mikes has held up to 5 seasons of 1000HP+ in a 4000 lb car, PLUS never been freshened up. Now I'm on the brake for 3-4 seconds building boost with the new turbo motor, this thing kicks *** and never misses a beat. Toughest tranny I've seen. 
04-16-2007, 11:48 AM
#24
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
1300 on pump is a ton of risk. Unless you are running at the pump gas drags better fuel should be used.
Your size question will relate to how far you need to go with fuel, less octane needs more cubes in general. If you can use good fuel, a nice 427 with a pair of GT42's will get it done easily.
Kurt
Your size question will relate to how far you need to go with fuel, less octane needs more cubes in general. If you can use good fuel, a nice 427 with a pair of GT42's will get it done easily.
Kurt
