Boring the LSX block
Edit: All motor, no power adder.[SIZE=3]
Last edited by Gordon0652; May 11, 2007 at 10:57 PM.
At the moment pistons and rings in larger bore sizes are custom. For that application should you choose Diamond pistons you would have to go with an inboard forged piston.
Just a heads up.
4.185 bore, 4.100 crank make you 451ci, able to use more shelf stock parts.
Beast96Z,
Aren't you doing 4.185 bore x 4.125 stroke??? 454ci
Gordon0652,
Listen to these guys, there's no reason to have a ticking time bomb or an engine block you may have to throw away if you have a problem and have to rebuild it. Even if you go 4.250 bore and 4.125 stroke, you'll just have a 468ci. Thats only 14 cubes more than the 454 and at approximately 1-1.5 hp per cubic inch, you're only giving up about 14-21 hp. Not worth it.
Do a 454ci, you'll be one happy bastard with ~650 RWHP N/A and nice idle quality.
And my goal is also 700 RWHP, but I just don't think its gonna happen on pump gas and with a rather tame street car with 12:1 cr. 650 will happen, I'm confident.
.
Last edited by Quickin; May 12, 2007 at 12:24 PM.
Trending Topics
There is a nother option, tall deck, a 495ci 4.185 x 4.50 or a 484ci 4.185 x 4.40.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
There is a nother option, tall deck, a 495ci 4.185 x 4.50 or a 484ci 4.185 x 4.40.
If they don't offer that....DO NOT USE THEM...PERIOD.
Tall deck is great, and if you're gonna spend money for an LSX super-stroker, than you'll have the money for the custom headers you'll need to have with the tall deck, and any other custom made part. So it isn't a big deal, don't that petty stuff stop ya.
Go for it man.
.
Last edited by Quickin; May 12, 2007 at 01:30 PM.
Beast96Z,
Aren't you doing 4.185 bore x 4.125 stroke??? 454ci
As for my motor, it's a 4.155" bore x 4.185" stroke. I was looking for the most hp/tq in a usable range. That's why i went with the longer stroke.
As for my motor, it's a 4.155" bore x 4.185" stroke. I was looking for the most hp/tq in a usable range. That's why i went with the longer stroke.Whats your opinion on the difference the Harrop would do compared to the Wilson or Hogan sheet metal intake? I don;t think I want to **** with the Harrop, seems like a pain in the ***.
.
Whats your opinion on the difference the Harrop would do compared to the Wilson or Hogan sheet metal intake? I don;t think I want to **** with the Harrop, seems like a pain in the ***.
.
I'd still like to see some results for the Wilson Billet intake. It's been lingering in the back of my mind if this Harrop things dosen't work out for some reason. I like the fact that it has longer runners, but I wouldn't buy one until I saw some results. As for your more traditional sheet metals, I'm not a fan. As always, they put up good big end numbers at the sacrifice of low to midrange power. It's completly out of the realm of my project. I want my motor to be done by 7k, and a traditional sheet metal would just be getting good. I hope the Harrop isn't as much trouble as people think there gunna be. If my 8 filter idea works, it should be a drop in.
There is a nother option, tall deck, a 495ci 4.185 x 4.50 or a 484ci 4.185 x 4.40.
HKRacingEngines.com
Wes

