Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

ETP...11 degree L92 castings (small bore)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2007 | 01:37 PM
  #21  
Stang's Bane's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 1
From: Mont Belvieu, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought the L92 heads were 15* like the LS1/LS2/LS6 etc... Correct
I thought only the LS7 heads were 11*? Close, 12*

So I was thinking that these ETP heads were an L92 design, but on 11* to enhance flow? Correct once again.

So which heads are which?

BTW what is the Deck Thickness on the ETP L92's vs the stock OEM L92 heads?

I have a H&C car, but shoot a little N2O now and then.
I am looking to upgrade my heads.
Hope that helps
Old 06-07-2007 | 04:36 PM
  #22  
Anonymous's Avatar
10 second playa

 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
Hope that helps
Yes, that does help. Thanks.

But then how will an L76 intake that is designed for a 15* head work on an aftermarket 11* head? Special gaskets? Spacers?

Aren't they rolling the head 4*?

What about the deck thickness? (for stability on the spray)
Old 06-07-2007 | 04:44 PM
  #23  
Stang's Bane's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 1
From: Mont Belvieu, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes, that does help. Thanks.

But then how will an L76 intake that is designed for a 15* head work on an aftermarket 11* head? Special gaskets? Spacers?

Aren't they rolling the head 4*?

What about the deck thickness? (for stability on the spray)
The head is at the same angle, they roll the valve.
Deck thickness should be much better.
Old 06-07-2007 | 04:44 PM
  #24  
Cary@Perf-Induction's Avatar
Collections Hold
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: howell mi
Default L92

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes, that does help. Thanks.

But then how will an L76 intake that is designed for a 15* head work on an aftermarket 11* head? Special gaskets? Spacers?

Aren't they rolling the head 4*?

What about the deck thickness? (for stability on the spray)

It is all bolt on stuff. No rolling decks. It is a purpose built head. No spacers or any of that, It will even accept stock l92 rocker arms.
Old 06-07-2007 | 07:43 PM
  #25  
02SOMWS6's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 2
From: Wallkill ,NY
Default

Originally Posted by cary et performance
It is all bolt on stuff. No rolling decks. It is a purpose built head. No spacers or any of that, It will even accept stock l92 rocker arms.
So my Tony Mamo ported 90mm Fast wont work with these heads? I make great power with a set of portd and milled 241's. These heads should put me head and shoulders over my current set up. What about harland sharp rockers I have now, will they work? Am I gong to have to sell all my LS1 stuff?
Old 06-07-2007 | 09:48 PM
  #26  
Mr.MartyStone's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 659
Likes: 1
From: Screwston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 02SOMWS6
So my Tony Mamo ported 90mm Fast wont work with these heads? I make great power with a set of portd and milled 241's. These heads should put me head and shoulders over my current set up. What about harland sharp rockers I have now, will they work? Am I gong to have to sell all my LS1 stuff?
No, your FAST 90 manifold wont work but your throttle body will work, only an L76 manifold will work (or carb'd or sheetmetal). No the HS rockers won't work either.

You'll most likely need new pushrods, rockers, and L76 manifold. You can sell your ported fast for more than you can buy the rockers and manifold together for.

Also sell your old heads with pushrods and you won't be that far off. Just head gaskets and tuning.

Marty
Old 06-07-2007 | 10:13 PM
  #27  
john_sblendorio's Avatar
On The Tree

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Texas / 427ci F1R 1,002 rwhp/928 rwtq
Default

Two questions:
1. is this basically the same head as the LS7 4.0, only for the L76 intake?
2. Why make these heads for a L76 manifold since it is clearly a bottleneck?
Old 06-08-2007 | 01:01 AM
  #28  
SSDude's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Can the L76 manifold be ported for better flow?
Old 06-08-2007 | 02:17 AM
  #29  
Lythropus's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Default

It's already been asked but how much thicker is the deck compared to a stock l92 head?
Old 06-08-2007 | 04:55 AM
  #30  
Cary@Perf-Induction's Avatar
Collections Hold
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: howell mi
Default deck

Originally Posted by Lythropus
It's already been asked but how much thicker is the deck compared to a stock l92 head?
The deck thickness is minimum .750
Old 06-08-2007 | 07:10 AM
  #31  
Mr.MartyStone's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 659
Likes: 1
From: Screwston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by john_sblendorio
Two questions:
1. is this basically the same head as the LS7 4.0, only for the L76 intake?
2. Why make these heads for a L76 manifold since it is clearly a bottleneck?
Because an L76 manifold won't be a restriction on a 346 where it is with a 408/416/427 etc. Plus you can port the manifold as well for more flow.

Marty
Old 06-08-2007 | 07:23 AM
  #32  
Stang's Bane's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 1
From: Mont Belvieu, TX
Default

The only problem with porting the l76 is that it is a 1 piece manifold, where as the fast and ls7 for sure are 2 piece manifolds. It is much easier to get in side of them and work. You shold have no problems portmatching the l76 to the heads, but beyond that, it could get a little rough...
Old 06-08-2007 | 08:01 AM
  #33  
hesham's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: ksa, jeddah
Default

so if i wnat to put the et 265 on my lq9 6.0 i should change my fast 90?
Old 06-08-2007 | 08:20 AM
  #34  
Stang's Bane's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 1
From: Mont Belvieu, TX
Default

Originally Posted by hesham
so if i wnat to put the et 265 on my lq9 6.0 i should change my fast 90?
If you want to let them breath you will.

If you are running 265's you shold be running
a) sheetmetal
b) Harrop or other ITB
c) Ported carb intake (probably race only setup)

Also if you want to see the benefits of the 265 on a 6.0 displacement, you better be ready to spin the ever living **** outof that thing. 8K+ rpm's
Old 06-08-2007 | 10:13 AM
  #35  
hesham's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: ksa, jeddah
Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
If you want to let them breath you will.

If you are running 265's you shold be running
a) sheetmetal
b) Harrop or other ITB
c) Ported carb intake (probably race only setup)

Also if you want to see the benefits of the 265 on a 6.0 displacement, you better be ready to spin the ever living **** outof that thing. 8K+ rpm's

even if i had a twin turbos

i want to change my MTI stage 2r heads so should i go for the et 265 with the wilson manifold
or go with et 255 and keep my fast?
Old 06-08-2007 | 10:56 AM
  #36  
Stang's Bane's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 1
From: Mont Belvieu, TX
Default

If you are running twins and a shot, I would stay away from the fast.
Anything above a ET225, you will be choking it with the fast.

How much boost will you be running?? IMHO I think you will have problems keeping your heads down on any of them...
Old 06-08-2007 | 11:22 AM
  #37  
hesham's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: ksa, jeddah
Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
If you are running twins and a shot, I would stay away from the fast.
Anything above a ET225, you will be choking it with the fast.

How much boost will you be running?? IMHO I think you will have problems keeping your heads down on any of them...

until now i went 10 psi and i gined 600 hp and i will go for 20 psi and that will be my max
Old 06-08-2007 | 07:51 PM
  #38  
Mr.MartyStone's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 659
Likes: 1
From: Screwston, TX
Default

Let's keep this thread on topic.

Marty
Old 06-09-2007 | 05:51 AM
  #39  
hesham's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: ksa, jeddah
Default

all what i wanna ask is what is the best et heads and intake maniflods thats fits my application
Old 06-09-2007 | 06:09 AM
  #40  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by hesham
until now i went 10 psi and i gined 600 hp and i will go for 20 psi and that will be my max
Anything over 15psi (1 BAR) and it is better to O-ring and beter to run an ironblock. Otherwise do not expect it to last long.

and yeah, the FAST is not a good seal because of it being a 3 piece. You can run a LS2 ported intake.


Quick Reply: ETP...11 degree L92 castings (small bore)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.