Katech 427 L76/92 Pics
06-14-2007, 10:20 PM
#23
Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller
How many different grinds did you guys try before you decided on this one? I can't see someone coming up with that grind on the first shot.
This is actually a GM cam - LS7 stage 3. I think it is available to the public now. The lobe design is amazing. It has excellent valvetrain dynamics even on the heavier L92 valve.
06-14-2007, 11:05 PM
#25
Originally Posted by Katech
This is actually a GM cam - LS7 stage 3. I think it is available to the public now. The lobe design is amazing. It has excellent valvetrain dynamics even on the heavier L92 valve.
06-15-2007, 01:21 AM
#27
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gun5l1ng3r
Just a little food for thought...
That motor makes 1 HP shy of the Carerra GT motor, all from pushrod technology and a little bit of Katech engineering.
That motor makes 1 HP shy of the Carerra GT motor, all from pushrod technology and a little bit of Katech engineering.
06-15-2007, 06:27 AM
#28
Originally Posted by gun5l1ng3r
Just a little food for thought...
That motor makes 1 HP shy of the Carerra GT motor, all from pushrod technology and a little bit of Katech engineering.
That motor makes 1 HP shy of the Carerra GT motor, all from pushrod technology and a little bit of Katech engineering.
06-15-2007, 06:39 AM
#29
great looking motor guys! can you tell us how much it will cost??? also would this be a good base units for a 427 turbo/Sc setup??? (obviously with revised comp. ratio and cam)
thanks Chris.
thanks Chris.
06-15-2007, 11:22 AM
#31
Although it looks like the ported L92s are doing as well as the LS7 heads, here is the cam with With 1.8 rockers and LS7 heads:
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...no_charts.html
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...no_charts.html
06-15-2007, 11:43 AM
#32
Originally Posted by See5
Although it looks like the ported L92s are doing as well as the LS7 heads, here is the cam with With 1.8 rockers and LS7 heads:
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...no_charts.html
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...no_charts.html
06-19-2007, 02:48 AM
#38
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=See5]Although it looks like the ported L92s are doing as well as the LS7 heads, here is the cam with With 1.8 rockers and LS7 heads:
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...no_charts.html[/QUOTE
What I am wondering is that the Stage 3 cam does not make more power than the Katech Torquer cam (220/244) on a similar LS7 engine.
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...no_charts.html[/QUOTE
What I am wondering is that the Stage 3 cam does not make more power than the Katech Torquer cam (220/244) on a similar LS7 engine.
06-19-2007, 10:14 AM
#39
[QUOTE=brausch]
Yes it does. The Stage 3 made 640 on an LS7
Originally Posted by See5
Although it looks like the ported L92s are doing as well as the LS7 heads, here is the cam with With 1.8 rockers and LS7 heads:
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...no_charts.html[/QUOTE
What I am wondering is that the Stage 3 cam does not make more power than the Katech Torquer cam (220/244) on a similar LS7 engine.
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...no_charts.html[/QUOTE
What I am wondering is that the Stage 3 cam does not make more power than the Katech Torquer cam (220/244) on a similar LS7 engine.
Yes it does. The Stage 3 made 640 on an LS7