Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

New TFS 245cc heads..Questions..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-2007, 04:25 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
beardWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lake Jackson,TX
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have 1 7/8 kooks on mine. Car pulls to 7700rpms if I let it. Bad thing is my 4l60e doesn`t like it and the valve train isn`t set-up to do that all the time. So I shift at 6800 right now! What comes in has to come out!
Old 09-03-2007, 06:06 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
 
njc.corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by beardWS6
! What comes in has to come out!

100% true
Old 09-05-2007, 10:46 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (177)
 
Jimmy P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The ET heads will work with stock rockers and their rocker stands, that is what I'm running myself
No trying to hijack the thread..but how well did the stock rockers line up on the valve when you used the rockerstand(pedestal). I have a set of 240 ET heads,and using the stock rockers, the rocker arm tip barely touches the valve. After a full rotation, the contact patch covers about a third of the valve.
I didnn't buy the TFS 245's, because I remember Brian saying of a similar issue when using stock rockers with them.
Old 09-06-2007, 07:16 AM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by bifster
so let me get this right.... the LS& heads still flow more then these ported heads? what about portin an LS7 head what would happen then???
There is really no need to port the intake side of a ls7 head. That intake port will support over 800 hp. The exhaust side could really use some help, but the intake port is fine.
Old 09-06-2007, 09:55 AM
  #25  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
1bigcam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: york pa
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

would they work on a 416
Old 09-06-2007, 12:42 PM
  #26  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Jeff@TotalPerformanceEng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: "Sin City" Las Vegas
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have heard/read about quite a few instaces where the ET's can NOT run stock rockers at all. You have to run aftermarkets..
As a matter of fact, the member "69TA" has a set of brand new ET265's for sale right now, and they came with Jesel rockers for this exact reason.

I was also speaking to someone yesterday and they said its the same problem with the TFS 235/245's. Can anyone "Confirm" this for a fact?
Originally Posted by Jimmy P
No trying to hijack the thread..but how well did the stock rockers line up on the valve when you used the rockerstand(pedestal). I have a set of 240 ET heads,and using the stock rockers, the rocker arm tip barely touches the valve. After a full rotation, the contact patch covers about a third of the valve.
I didnn't buy the TFS 245's, because I remember Brian saying of a similar issue when using stock rockers with them.
Old 09-06-2007, 01:08 PM
  #27  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
ATVracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: GB
Posts: 5,297
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have ET 225's and I had to shim the rocker stand up to get the stock rockers to work.

My car has seen 7800 rpms with no signs of valve float.

Ashley's car has ET 255's with stock rockers and hers has been over 8,000 rpms with no valve float.

I have yet to see a set of TFS do any better than ETP's or AFR's.
All 3 are very good heads .... its all in what you want.
Old 09-06-2007, 01:40 PM
  #28  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

My valves and whatnot are perfect with stock rockers, and they were also shimmed slightly. I've had mine to 7600 with no problems, carries power right to it too.

With the 265's you have to run a differnt rocker I do believe, as well as a custom intake. But, if you need those heads, you're probably running all custom anyway.
Old 09-06-2007, 02:36 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
3.4camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Galveston, TX
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

TEA says roller tip rockers are required on TFS heads because of the change in valve angle.
Old 09-07-2007, 01:42 PM
  #30  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AMERICAN_HP
I was also speaking to someone yesterday and they said its the same problem with the TFS 235/245's. Can anyone "Confirm" this for a fact?
The first TFS heads that were released had geometry optimized for roller rockers and used 7.700” long pushrods, which made the head incompatible with stock rockers. TFS eventually changed their geometry to be like stock GM and now uses 7.500” long pushrods. TFS did a ton of durability testing and found that no matter what geometry was used that stock rockers caused considerable wear on bronze guides. So if you have a stock GM head, or an ET head, or an AFR head, and use stock rockers, they will eventually cause significant wear on the bronze guides. I know one other aftermarket head manufacturer knows about this problem but has not yet to post anything about it.

Last edited by Brian Tooley Racing; 09-07-2007 at 01:47 PM.
Old 09-08-2007, 12:50 AM
  #31  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Jeff@TotalPerformanceEng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: "Sin City" Las Vegas
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well......

I heard it from the horses mouth.. I ordered some new Yella Terra rockers today.

Thanks for the info.
Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
The first TFS heads that were released had geometry optimized for roller rockers and used 7.700” long pushrods, which made the head incompatible with stock rockers. TFS eventually changed their geometry to be like stock GM and now uses 7.500” long pushrods. TFS did a ton of durability testing and found that no matter what geometry was used that stock rockers caused considerable wear on bronze guides. So if you have a stock GM head, or an ET head, or an AFR head, and use stock rockers, they will eventually cause significant wear on the bronze guides. I know one other aftermarket head manufacturer knows about this problem but has not yet to post anything about it.
Old 09-08-2007, 01:13 AM
  #32  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
JMBLOWNWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Braunfels ,Tx
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
The first TFS heads that were released had geometry optimized for roller rockers and used 7.700” long pushrods, which made the head incompatible with stock rockers. TFS eventually changed their geometry to be like stock GM and now uses 7.500” long pushrods. TFS did a ton of durability testing and found that no matter what geometry was used that stock rockers caused considerable wear on bronze guides. So if you have a stock GM head, or an ET head, or an AFR head, and use stock rockers, they will eventually cause significant wear on the bronze guides. I know one other aftermarket head manufacturer knows about this problem but has not yet to post anything about it.
Its funny you say this. I heard the same thing about AFR's This is why I am going with yella terra light weight rockers with my setup.
Old 09-08-2007, 02:27 AM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (177)
 
Jimmy P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

So basically, its a design flaw straight from GM. If we use stock rockers with the stock heads, we are going to cause significant wear on the broze guide?
How long till the wear is bad?
Old 09-08-2007, 05:50 AM
  #34  
TECH Resident
 
njc.corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jimmy P
So basically, its a design flaw straight from GM. If we use stock rockers with the stock heads, we are going to cause significant wear on the broze guide?
How long till the wear is bad?

i would like to know too-????
Old 09-08-2007, 12:11 PM
  #35  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
beardWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lake Jackson,TX
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I need to ask Erik what he used on my ET 245`s. I have forgotten!
Old 09-09-2007, 09:53 AM
  #36  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
AshWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mt. Airy MD
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Send us some TFS 245s Brian well test them, for free even
Old 09-10-2007, 04:21 PM
  #37  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jimmy P
So basically, its a design flaw straight from GM. If we use stock rockers with the stock heads, we are going to cause significant wear on the broze guide?
How long till the wear is bad?
The stock GM heads have powdered metal guides and will not wear, but the stock rockers can still cause marks on the tops of the valves.

If you put bronze guides in a GM head the guides will wear if you run over .550" lift, you will probably see wear within 10,000 miles, and you will eventully see oil consumption. It depends on what oil is used, how often it is changed, etc but it is just a matter of time before you see oil consumption with ANY head that uses bronze guides and stock rockers over .550" lift.
Old 09-11-2007, 12:28 AM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (177)
 
Jimmy P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

So what aftermarket rockers would you recommend for me? I have a set of ETP 240 heads, so I am guessing the rockers will need to be adjustable, right?
Old 09-11-2007, 12:31 AM
  #39  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
JMBLOWNWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Braunfels ,Tx
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yella Terra are my choice to run with these heads.
Old 09-11-2007, 12:32 AM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (177)
 
Jimmy P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Are the Yella Terras adjustbale?


Quick Reply: New TFS 245cc heads..Questions..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.