Precision Race Components LS7 Cylinder Head Engine Dyno Results!!
#21
Am I the only one that looks at this as they only gained 27hp and 5-20 ft/lbs of torque through out the rpm band over stock heads? That tells me that the factory ls7 heads are pretty badass from the factory. And those gains might not be as large once the motor gets bolted up in a car with real world accesories and exhaust / intake.
Again, I'm not knocking, just amazed at how well the factory heads work with the larger cam and all of the intake/exhaust work.
Again, I'm not knocking, just amazed at how well the factory heads work with the larger cam and all of the intake/exhaust work.
I would like to see what it would do on 93 octane instead of 113 to show what we would really get in street trim. Who knows how much it would drop, its does have street compression at 11.8 so I would like to think not a huge amount, but I don't know how to even estimate that.
#22
I agree, it kind of shows that the stock LS7 heads pretty much max the plastic intake. The results are still great, especially considering their heads cost less than stock. They would probably show more gain if tested back to back with a sheet metal.
I would like to see what it would do on 93 octane instead of 113 to show what we would really get in street trim. Who knows how much it would drop, its does have street compression at 11.8 so I would like to think not a huge amount, but I don't know how to even estimate that.
I would like to see what it would do on 93 octane instead of 113 to show what we would really get in street trim. Who knows how much it would drop, its does have street compression at 11.8 so I would like to think not a huge amount, but I don't know how to even estimate that.
I wouldn't doubt that it would make a solid 7-10 more horsepower with 93.
#23
Actually, it would probably make more power on 93 than the 113. You always want to run as low of an octane without getting knock. As the octane rating goes up, the amount of energy decreases, which is one of the reasons octane goes up. Octane is a measurement of resistance to auto ignition, in loose terms. The higher the octane, the less thermal energy available.
I wouldn't doubt that it would make a solid 7-10 more horsepower with 93.
I wouldn't doubt that it would make a solid 7-10 more horsepower with 93.
#24
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Texas and Qatar
I believe these runs were 28* of timing. It made the most power at 26*, but thats not shown in these dyno runs, but was done later with other cams. We could have made much more if this was more of a race setup with more compression, but this motor was a in-stock motor that is going to a customer next week for a GTO.
I do have a similiar setup scheduled for install, but it probably won't be done until the middle of January with how busy we have been.
Anyway just thought I'd throw another post in before going skiing. Have a great weekend guys!
I do have a similiar setup scheduled for install, but it probably won't be done until the middle of January with how busy we have been.
Anyway just thought I'd throw another post in before going skiing. Have a great weekend guys!
#25
I believe these runs were 28* of timing. It made the most power at 26*, but thats not shown in these dyno runs, but was done later with other cams. We could have made much more if this was more of a race setup with more compression, but this motor was a in-stock motor that is going to a customer next week for a GTO.
I do have a similiar setup scheduled for install, but it probably won't be done until the middle of January with how busy we have been.
Anyway just thought I'd throw another post in before going skiing. Have a great weekend guys!
I do have a similiar setup scheduled for install, but it probably won't be done until the middle of January with how busy we have been.
Anyway just thought I'd throw another post in before going skiing. Have a great weekend guys!
#27
I guess that would depend on how they had it tuned as well. I see your point if it was a 93 octane tune and then all they did is put 113 in it, but if they tuned it for 113 I'm sure they would have to back off the timing for 93. Anyhow, just seems l like a lot of variables to me, I wish they tested with 93 they we would not have to speculate.
I think he's saying to run that octane you need higher compression. You always want to run the lowest octane you can without detonation. 11.8:1 can run 91 without detonating. 12.5:1 however you can not. Minimum you can run is 100. Running high octane in a car that doesn't need it will make you lose power. Thats how I understand it anyway.
#28
Just as an FYI, TSP ran similar conditions with their 418cid L92 headed engine that made 640HP on the engine dyno with those same 1-7/8" headers.
In a Camaro that 418 L92 made 560rwhp with 1-3/4" headers and full street trim. So if you figure the variables were about the same for the engine dyno, then you can count on losing probably around 80HP. I lost around 70HP in my Vette - engine dyno to chassis dyno, so I figure that's pretty close.
720HP - 80HP is still a god awful lot. I'm not sure it'd pull 640rwhp... but ported LS7 heads with big cams have made 600-615 with 427cid. Add another 25+ cid and it could add another 15-25rwhp. In street trim it's probably a solid 620rwhp.
In a Camaro that 418 L92 made 560rwhp with 1-3/4" headers and full street trim. So if you figure the variables were about the same for the engine dyno, then you can count on losing probably around 80HP. I lost around 70HP in my Vette - engine dyno to chassis dyno, so I figure that's pretty close.
720HP - 80HP is still a god awful lot. I'm not sure it'd pull 640rwhp... but ported LS7 heads with big cams have made 600-615 with 427cid. Add another 25+ cid and it could add another 15-25rwhp. In street trim it's probably a solid 620rwhp.
#29
Am I the only one that looks at this as they only gained 27hp and 5-20 ft/lbs of torque through out the rpm band over stock heads? That tells me that the factory ls7 heads are pretty badass from the factory. And those gains might not be as large once the motor gets bolted up in a car with real world accesories and exhaust / intake.
Again, I'm not knocking, just amazed at how well the factory heads work with the larger cam and all of the intake/exhaust work.
Again, I'm not knocking, just amazed at how well the factory heads work with the larger cam and all of the intake/exhaust work.
Great work TSP.
#31
Thread Starter
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 2
From: Texas!
Am I the only one that looks at this as they only gained 27hp and 5-20 ft/lbs of torque through out the rpm band over stock heads? That tells me that the factory ls7 heads are pretty badass from the factory. And those gains might not be as large once the motor gets bolted up in a car with real world accesories and exhaust / intake.
Again, I'm not knocking, just amazed at how well the factory heads work with the larger cam and all of the intake/exhaust work.
Again, I'm not knocking, just amazed at how well the factory heads work with the larger cam and all of the intake/exhaust work.
Here's what you get: 27 hp over the stock ALREADY CNC PORTED HEADS for less cost than a brand new GM CNC LS7 Cylinder Head!
-------------
Guys the engine was run on 100 octane, but it will be in a 93 octane GTO very shortly.
We've had several dyno tests showing 30rwhp gains on LS7 Z06 cars with no other changes but the heads & a little decking.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#33
Thread Starter
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 2
From: Texas!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#34
This post completely amazes me.... Do you understand what your saying? Your saying your surprised that we were able to build a cnc ported head to replace a already cnc ported head with all the same components & pickup ONLY 27hp? That post completely surprises me!
Here's what you get: 27 hp over the stock ALREADY CNC PORTED HEADS for less cost than a brand new GM CNC LS7 Cylinder Head!
-------------
Guys the engine was run on 100 octane, but it will be in a 93 octane GTO very shortly.
We've had several dyno tests showing 30rwhp gains on LS7 Z06 cars with no other changes but the heads & a little decking.
Here's what you get: 27 hp over the stock ALREADY CNC PORTED HEADS for less cost than a brand new GM CNC LS7 Cylinder Head!
-------------
Guys the engine was run on 100 octane, but it will be in a 93 octane GTO very shortly.
We've had several dyno tests showing 30rwhp gains on LS7 Z06 cars with no other changes but the heads & a little decking.
But still. It's not the size gains like going from an ls1 factory cast peice to a custom cnc'd head that you see 50+ horsepower.
I wasnt' knocking yours, just saying how well the factory heads flowed considering the larger cam and headers ect. It tells me that the factory ls7 heads aren't the biggest restriction in the factory ls7.
#35
Plus, I understand that you say people are picking up 30hp just swapping heads, but how much of a gain are they getting from doing a different cam? It's an honest question, that I don't know the answer to. Everything I've heard was the ls7 was undercammed from the factory and people were seeing pretty big gains with just a cam and header swap.
#36
Thread Starter
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 2
From: Texas!
Oh I got ya!!! The ls7 picks up huge power with cam & head swaps thats for sure!!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#37
Plus, I understand that you say people are picking up 30hp just swapping heads, but how much of a gain are they getting from doing a different cam? It's an honest question, that I don't know the answer to. Everything I've heard was the ls7 was undercammed from the factory and people were seeing pretty big gains with just a cam and header swap.
#38
Actually, it would probably make more power on 93 than the 113. You always want to run as low of an octane without getting knock. As the octane rating goes up, the amount of energy decreases, which is one of the reasons octane goes up. Octane is a measurement of resistance to auto ignition, in loose terms. The higher the octane, the less thermal energy available.
#39
#40
That is very impressive! I would like to here that engine at an idle.
Jason, What was the lobe separation on that cam that produced those numbers? And what was the lift on it too? I would really like to know.
Thanks,
Jesse
Jason, What was the lobe separation on that cam that produced those numbers? And what was the lift on it too? I would really like to know.
Thanks,
Jesse