Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

ls7 rods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2007, 01:33 PM
  #21  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (19)
 
Katech_Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by restoman45
I will be going dry sump as well...

It will be a 4" stroke, depending on my final cam choice may or may not rev to 8k rpm, but would like a rod that is safe for those rpm/power, but I also want something light...
I'd recommend not revving it to 8000rpm with that stroke.
Old 12-18-2007, 04:15 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
 
njc.corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

8000 rpm on any rod is starting to get their- the loads would start to come in play in those rpm's

i am gusessing 427- would u need to turn it to 8,000 to make power-?
Old 12-18-2007, 10:25 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
bowtiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boulder Bubble, Colorado
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

FWIW, there is a forum member that lives near by that runs katechs LS7 stroker cam/springs,etc....He has a stock bottom end milled heads by 30 thou ported intake , headers etc....

He regularly spins the car to 8K rpm. Doesn't mean everyone can and he knows he is running on borrowed time but he is used to 9K plus on his SB2. This is w/o the rod rebush, but after 1 year its still together. Last chassis dyno was just shy of 600hp. just real world info, stock ti valves, stock hollow SS exhaust valves and stock rods.
Old 12-19-2007, 10:04 AM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
restoman45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SC/hotels in the southeast
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yea, it will be a 427. with the engine combo I am going with, the peak power will probably end up being around the 7-8krpm mark...but I wont be spinning it any higher than need be.


bowtiguy - thanks for the info.
Old 12-19-2007, 10:08 AM
  #25  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (53)
 
See5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hobart, WI
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by restoman45
yea, it will be a 427. with the engine combo I am going with, the peak power will probably end up being around the 7-8krpm mark...but I wont be spinning it any higher than need be.


bowtiguy - thanks for the info.
What intake/cam are you going to use to get peak power above 7k?
Old 12-19-2007, 11:02 AM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
restoman45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SC/hotels in the southeast
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by See5
What intake/cam are you going to use to get peak power above 7k?

I will be going sheetmetal...Beck most likely. cam will probably be spec'd in the high 270's, maybe low 280's at .050, and high 700's lift most likely but this will all be determined with the headflow sheets.

Im not building a motor to say it rev's to 8k rpm, it will just be a byproduct of the parts I am choosing to make its power. If the peak power is lower, then its lower, but I want to build it strong and light...This will not be a daily driver by any means...maybe a couple trips to some car shows, and a few afternoon rips down the street, and then a few trips to the strip a year...
Old 12-19-2007, 08:22 PM
  #27  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Robin L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rockfield Kentucky
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I have been told the rods are good to 700 horsepower. Above that level your pushing the limits of the rod.

I know that replacing the 2 piece bushing with a 1 piece design is benificial.

As the RPM goes up the durability of the rods drop off.

It's a great rod for what it was designed. Maybe a little more.

Robin



Quick Reply: ls7 rods



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 PM.