Another Cam Question
#1
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Another Cam Question
My car will be street and strip, mostly street. It's a 364 CI with L92's and will run a carb. Also auto trans. Will a 232-234 and .592-598 with a 112 lsa be to much. All the post I have read over time says these motors run well with these big port heads. I want to take advantage of that feature but don't want to over do the cam. With that duration I'm thinking I should be ok.
Comments from the experienced pro's would be helpful. Thanks again
Also plan to run the new and improved Comp Cam beehive #26918 valve
spring when the are availble.
Comments from the experienced pro's would be helpful. Thanks again
Also plan to run the new and improved Comp Cam beehive #26918 valve
spring when the are availble.
#2
cam isnt too big but isnt right for the l92's,you need a bigger split due to poor flow on the exhaust side of the head.Pm me i can do you a nice custom grind that will work well for that combo
#3
Is this a stock bottom end engine? Are you running a stock L92 head or a ported L92 head? How big of stall converter? Rear gear ratio and car weight will also help. With this info you should be able to get more accurate help.
#4
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Stock bottom except for ARP rod bolts, non ported L92's
Car weight = 2750, 3.90 gear. Need a new converter Thanks
Shawn....Sent you a reply
Car weight = 2750, 3.90 gear. Need a new converter Thanks
Shawn....Sent you a reply
Last edited by bluethunder364; 01-22-2008 at 09:03 AM. Reason: add
#5
My car will be street and strip, mostly street. It's a 364 CI with L92's and will run a carb. Also auto trans. Will a 232-234 and .592-598 with a 112 lsa be to much. All the post I have read over time says these motors run well with these big port heads. I want to take advantage of that feature but don't want to over do the cam. With that duration I'm thinking I should be ok.
Comments from the experienced pro's would be helpful. Thanks again
Also plan to run the new and improved Comp Cam beehive #26918 valve
spring when the are availble.
Comments from the experienced pro's would be helpful. Thanks again
Also plan to run the new and improved Comp Cam beehive #26918 valve
spring when the are availble.
Cam I have in and yours are very, very close. I have dynoed at 450rwhp, through a stalled A4. I have non-ported L92's on a stock 6.0.
#7
I would suggest around a 10-14 degree split in your .050" duration numbers. Also I would use a very aggressive exhaust lobe to help get things started a little faster. Depending on the intake duration used/wanted your ptv will dictate your LSA (probably will be 112* + 0* even with flycutting for your most aggressive LSA).
Trending Topics
#8
We've done extensive engine & chassis dyno testing with l92 configurations on 6.0l, 408 & 418cid l92 head engines. Give me a call when you get some time & lets discuss your specific needs. There's a lot of mis-information about camming l92 headed setups online...... We've done some p/v testing with several different camshafts & I even have valve relief cutters for l92 size valves in my office
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#9
Jason, are you considering his non-ported L92 heads into the equation? Just wondering, I have been given my recommendations by the head cam grinder, we were taking flow numbers through the L76 intake with stock L92 heads on a 364 cid motor.