Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

L92 stock valves NOT GOOD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-29-2008, 11:37 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
 
blu00rdstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by See5
FWIW I weighed up some valves a while back:

Stock L92 intake-108.6 grams -- Some non magnetic alloy
Manley 11620 -119 grams- Intake- The Manleys are solid SS
Manley 11621-92 grams- Exh
LS3 intake -89 grams -- hollow alloy and my current favorite (NA) with single springs
LS3 exh same part# as L92 Exh- some non magnetic alloy
Yeah, those Manleys are fricking heavy compared to the LS3 hollow valves I replaced. But those big valves don't have to move much compared to the exhaust. The Comp 921 springs should help some.

You didn't list the weight of the L92/LS3 exhaust valve, got a number to compare to the Manley exhaust grams?
Old 03-01-2008, 06:38 AM
  #22  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (53)
 
See5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hobart, WI
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by blu00rdstr
Yeah, those Manleys are fricking heavy compared to the LS3 hollow valves I replaced. But those big valves don't have to move much compared to the exhaust. The Comp 921 springs should help some.

You didn't list the weight of the L92/LS3 exhaust valve, got a number to compare to the Manley exhaust grams?
I don't remember but it was close to the stockers. I will check next week.
The Manley intakes are the "right" boosted valve.
Old 03-01-2008, 06:43 AM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
cam75w/ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmmh, seems the stock 6.0 valves do the same thing. Had a 70yr old customer driving her truck and dropped a valve. Owned it since new and didn't abuse it. This was a 2003 hd 2500.
Attached Thumbnails L92 stock valves NOT GOOD-engine-pics-006.5.jpg   L92 stock valves NOT GOOD-engine-pics-007.5.jpg  
Old 03-01-2008, 08:20 AM
  #24  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
fossil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ms
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I work at a GM service dept and we have not seen any valve failures on the 6.2L as of yet. I did call one my friends at TAC in Detroit and he said the valve problem is no worse than the few we see in the Gen III engines. Just a theory, maybe the factory springs pressure is not enough to pull these big valves back closed quickly enough and maybe not enough seat pressure to keep the intake valves seated? Higher rpms would be even more dramatic. So we then have a possible valve to piston contact issue? And maybe my theory just makes me feel better about my setup also?? Ha Ha Ha
Old 03-01-2008, 08:54 AM
  #25  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fossil
I work at a GM service dept and we have not seen any valve failures on the 6.2L as of yet. I did call one my friends at TAC in Detroit and he said the valve problem is no worse than the few we see in the Gen III engines. Just a theory, maybe the factory springs pressure is not enough to pull these big valves back closed quickly enough and maybe not enough seat pressure to keep the intake valves seated? Higher rpms would be even more dramatic. So we then have a possible valve to piston contact issue? And maybe my theory just makes me feel better about my setup also?? Ha Ha Ha
Thank you.
Old 03-01-2008, 09:07 AM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Websy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This is jsut great, another thing I need to adress but better that I caught it now rather than later. Thanks guys but what about the exhaust valves?
Old 03-01-2008, 11:20 AM
  #27  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Websy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by See5
I have another new set of the Manley SSs intakes if those can make you feel better?
blu00rdstr above is going to try and blow his up as well

So how much are these and are they a direct replacement or modification, etc?
Old 03-01-2008, 11:26 AM
  #28  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jay_lt4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mine is together. im going to run it.
Old 03-01-2008, 11:36 AM
  #29  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by bluethunder364
****, I have an order in for a full set of stockers from GMPD that are on the way. Would return them however the web site states that this is a special order item and non-returnable. Now what?? Nothing like buying two sets of valves for your heads.
Will be running #26918 springs

I'm thinking it's better than buying 2 engines for your car.
Old 03-01-2008, 11:50 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
1BadAction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas, TX!
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fossil
Just a theory, maybe the factory springs pressure is not enough to pull these big valves back closed quickly enough and maybe not enough seat pressure to keep the intake valves seated?
ding ding ding... you got it. the posts above are classic signs of too weak of a valve spring for the valve. engineers seem to love these "barely enough pressure" springs. The problem arises when you get a weaker batch of springs than the minimums they accounted for, or after 60 or 70k the heat cycling weakens them just enough to let the valve beat the **** out of everything.
Old 03-01-2008, 05:48 PM
  #31  
Teching In
 
VX8255's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jay_lt4
info from the gm technicians dealer forum- seems some of the 6.2 L92 engines are having problems with the valves breaking off,, some have posted the valve broke right where the keepers go and another stated that is broke off behind the head of the valve,, taking out pistons, cylinders, engines locked right up.

and these are just stock trucks, several have already posted that they have trucks at there dealers waiting for an engine.


i guess those of us with stock valve L92's are screwed, if the valves are having issues on stock truck engines, what will they do at 7000 rpm with high spring pressure



.
Stock solid stem valves in my car for over 10,000miles so far. LSK Lobes, 921 springs, buzzed to 7,000rpm once and a while, no problems yet.
Old 03-03-2008, 11:33 PM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Websy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by VX8255
Stock solid stem valves in my car for over 10,000miles so far. LSK Lobes, 921 springs, buzzed to 7,000rpm once and a while, no problems yet.
That sounds assuring but I went ahead and ordered the ss manleys for insurance since I'll be pushing some series ammount of boost. Glad I caught this thread, cheap insurance if you ask me!
Old 03-04-2008, 08:58 AM
  #33  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Red Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Houston
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default L92 valves

Originally Posted by bluethunder364
****, I have an order in for a full set of stockers from GMPD that are on the way. Would return them however the web site states that this is a special order item and non-returnable. Now what?? Nothing like buying two sets of valves for your heads.
Will be running #26918 springs

If you havent already bought your springs, you might want to do a search over on LS1GTO and check out some of the broken 918's there. If you are running a big cam trouble could be looking for you.
Old 03-04-2008, 09:02 AM
  #34  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (53)
 
See5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hobart, WI
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

There are third generation 918s which are all new. New spring, new supplier to Comp.
Old 03-04-2008, 09:54 AM
  #35  
Launching!
 
Yeahdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by See5
There are third generation 918s which are all new. New spring, new supplier to Comp.
The new supplier is the cause of all the problems
Old 03-04-2008, 09:57 AM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
1BadAction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas, TX!
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Yeahdoug
The new supplier is the cause of all the problems


the 3rd generation of springs fix the breaking problems... if they look like this -


you will be OK. end-
Old 03-04-2008, 10:02 AM
  #37  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (53)
 
See5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hobart, WI
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I personally think they should have called the 3rd version 919 or something, but who cares?
My friends at Comp assure me this is a far superior spring.
Old 03-04-2008, 10:08 AM
  #38  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
nahasapeemapetalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Grand Forks, North Dakota
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What about titanium valves?
Old 03-04-2008, 10:18 AM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
1BadAction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas, TX!
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default after some investigating...

I find it interesting and amusing that this Yeahdoug guy shows up any time there is a shitstorm about valve spring problems. I wonder what company he works for
Old 03-04-2008, 10:24 AM
  #40  
Launching!
 
Yeahdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1BadAction
I find it interesting and amusing that this Yeahdoug guy shows up any time there is a shitstorm about valve spring problems. I wonder what company he works for
You're right. I'll stay out of any spring related threads since I know nothing about springs or valve spring related issues.

I'll just let all the mis-information about springs continue to spread. Doesn't matter to me. You obviously know more about them than me. When one of my Pro-stock customers calls me today, I'll forward it on to you.

Sorry for the Hijack.

Like others have said. Part of the problem is not having enough spring to control that heavy *** valve. If you want to run beehives try installing them a little tighter for some extra seat pressure (keeping enough clearance to coil bind) or just run duals (patriots, 921, etc)

Last edited by Yeahdoug; 03-04-2008 at 10:34 AM.


Quick Reply: L92 stock valves NOT GOOD



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 PM.